Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 09:37:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 08 03:37:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from debussy.shockfrosted.org [80.237.232.15] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18KxsH-000310-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:37:21 -0600
Received: from TK150122.tuwien.teleweb.at (TK150122.tuwien.teleweb.at 
[195.34.150.122])
        by debussy.shockfrosted.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 11BF11A811; Sun,  8 Dec 2002 10:37:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: by TK150122.tuwien.teleweb.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4197B82D1; Sun,  8 Dec 2002 11:35:48 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel modules can't be loaded
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 11:35:48 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-report
Version: debian-installer alpha (not installed)
Severity: normal

Hi!


debian-installer doesn't seem to be able to load kernel modules. It
autodetects my 3c59x based NIC, but it can't load the corresponding
module. I had to do depmod manually to make it work.


regards, Stefan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux TK150122 2.4.20 #1 Die Dez 3 20:00:00 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172192-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 01:20:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 19:20:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AJNCG-0003vb-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:19:56 -0600
Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1AJNCF-0006N3-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing old installation reports
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.23-pre9 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_90
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

(This is my third attempt at sending this mail, and they keep getting eaten.
I'll split now and hope it gets through. :-) )

I'm closing a bunch of old installation reports that do not appear to be
related to the current state of the installer (ie. report problems that has
been fixed now; some of these should have been closed ages ago, but never
was). Feel free to test the d-i beta and submit new installation reports :-)

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

Reply via email to