Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

, and there was only one (libqt6concurrent6, and that > > is not a real one either -- I just still have libqt6concurrent6t64). > > Please trust full-upgrade. In this case, please replace libqt6concurrent6t64 > (which likely points to an older Qt version and it was removed from the > archive) with l

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

t still have libqt6concurrent6t64). Please trust full-upgrade. In this case, please replace libqt6concurrent6t64 (which likely points to an older Qt version and it was removed from the archive) with libqt6concurrent6. Ciao -- Luigi

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

Hi, On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:51:16 +0100 Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > > The documented upgrade procedure has always been apt upgrade then apt > full-upgrade. > > See : > > That page speaks of upgradi

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

Le 7 janvier 2025 12:39:05 GMT+01:00, Shai Berger a écrit : >Hi all, > >On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:33:44 +0100 >Hefee wrote: > >> it is great to see a lot useful information shared via this mailing >> list. To find all the quirks in upgrading to Plasma 6 / Qt 6. >

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 01:39:05PM +0200, Shai Berger wrote: > Sharing my little "worry story" -- I used "apt upgrade" on testing (I > never use full-upgrade) and it installed many packages, but apparently > left many missing. And it also didnt remove many packages that needed removing for an orde

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 01:39:05PM +0200, Shai Berger wrote: > Sharing my little "worry story" -- I used "apt upgrade" on testing (I > never use full-upgrade) This is a user problem. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

Hi all, On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:33:44 +0100 Hefee wrote: > it is great to see a lot useful information shared via this mailing > list. To find all the quirks in upgrading to Plasma 6 / Qt 6. > > It would be great if all those knowledge is not only bound to this > ml. Let'

Keep wiki for Plasma 6 / Qt 6 upgrade information in sync

Hey, it is great to see a lot useful information shared via this mailing list. To find all the quirks in upgrading to Plasma 6 / Qt 6. It would be great if all those knowledge is not only bound to this ml. Let's make sure that the wiki will be our primary knowledge pool regarding the q

Lingering dependencies on Qt 5 and Kf 5

While a lot of KDE packages already fully switched to Qt 6 and Kf 6, some still have some lingering dependencies while they could avoid it. For example kup-backup allows it upstream: https://invent.kde.org/system/kup/-/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt?ref_type=heads#L51 Same for a few lingering

Re: KMail: fonts in message view look "rough" (upstream bug found, fixed in Qt 6.8)

Luigi Toscano - 23.12.24, 00:12:30 MEZ: > > Great find! Thank you! > > > > If you like you could open a Debian bug report for tracking. Not > > exactly sure which package, maybe libqt6webenginecore6.> > > For later reference: […] > > So it seems this will a

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

> INFO: Working right now on a Windows workstation, I can test an APT > full-upgrade to sid this evening on my Debian system. The APT full-upgrade went fine - with explicitly adding 3 packages like plasma-integration = 6.2.1-1+b1, etc. from D/exp - otherwise they got removed. ( Here I have KP v6.2

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

> > > > Not sure what means "transition is done" - for me it means when all > > > > software depending on it is rebuilt against -dev packages, too. > > > > > > What is not rebuilt yet? > > > > > > > Simple question: > > Does quassel ne

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

autopkgtests need investigation, > > > > but > > > > in sid it should already be fine. > > > > > > > > > > Not sure what means "transition is done" - for me it means when all > > > software depending on it is rebuilt ag

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

against -dev packages, too. > > What is not rebuilt yet? > Simple question: Does quassel need a rebuild against all QT-5.15.15 -dev packages it depends on: Yes or No? INFO: Working right now on a Windows workstation, I can test an APT full-upgrade to sid this evening on my Debian system

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:26:39AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > The transition is still on-going ... > > > > Looks like it's almost finished, a couple of FTBFS packages need removal > > from testing and a couple of failing autopkgtests need investigation, but > > in sid it should already be fine

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > The transition is still on-going ... Looks like it's almost finished, a couple of FTBFS packages need removal from testing and a couple of failing autopkgtests need investigation, but in sid it should already be fine. > Just a questio

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:16 AM Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > The transition is still on-going ... > > Looks like it's almost finished, a couple of FTBFS packages need removal > from testing and a couple of failing autopkgtests nee

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

The transition is still on-going ... Just a question about quassel status: armhf + arm64 have NEW packages in D/sid. Is there sth. BROKEN with the AMD64 packages? Where can I see the status or a build-log? Thanks. Best regards, -Sedat- . https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

; > > > Here I am on Debian/unstable AMD64. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > -Sedat- > > > > > > > To be more precise: > > > > This happens if you use KDE/Plasma and other KDE stuff from D/exp. > > No,

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

Best regards, > > -Sedat- > > > > To be more precise: > > This happens if you use KDE/Plasma and other KDE stuff from D/exp. No, this happens on pure sid, because the Qt transition is underway. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

more precise: This happens if you use KDE/Plasma and other KDE stuff from D/exp. Some KDE software still needs an older version of QT-5 etc. -sed@-

CAUTION: QT-5 version 5.15.15 + 5.15.17 upgrade in Debian/unstable

Hi, just as a warning to be careful and check APT suggestions. Here 80+ packages will be removed. Here I am on Debian/unstable AMD64. Thanks. Best regards, -Sedat-

Re: SDDM configuration details (was: Re: Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2)

onfusing. > > None of them work. Ah, it might be Qt 6 based versus Qt 5 based theme. sddm from experimental is Qt 6 based. I upgraded another device to Plasam 6.2.0. And interestingly it works nicely enough with sddm from unstable. And there maldives theme works just fine. Best, -- Martin - please no carbon copy to me

kate from experimental usable with Qt 6.7.2

Hi! Patrick fixed it up. Version 4:24.08.2-1. Thank you! Best, -- Martin - please no carbon copy to me

Re: SDDM configuration details (was: Re: Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2)

Martin Steigerwald - 12.10.24, 11:25:28 MESZ: > So there are two different mechanism for theme selection. The > alternatives system: update-alternatives --config sddm-debian-theme and > Systemsettings. This is confusing. None of them work. First I made sure I upgraded all sddm-theme packages to e

SDDM configuration details (was: Re: Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2)

Hi! Geoff - 12.10.24, 10:33:27 MESZ: > Luc Castermans wrote: > > after update and booted up i am looking to a fully black screen, with > > mouse nicely movable. that's it. > > > > could someone share a list of related KDE packages which should be > > installed? […] > I had to remove the config fi

Re: Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2

Luc Castermans wrote: after update and booted up i am looking to a fully black screen, with mouse nicely movable. that's it. could someone share a list of related KDE packages which should be installed? Luc I had to remove the config files from /etc/sddm.conf.d/ as I had the same thing. sdd

Re: Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2

Hej Luc, Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2024, 17:07:40 CEST schrieb Luc Castermans: > after update and booted up i am looking to a fully black screen, with > mouse nicely movable. that's it. > > could someone share a list of related KDE packages which should be > installed? I don't have a list of packa

Qt 6.7.2, plasma 6.2

after update and booted up i am looking to a fully black screen, with mouse nicely movable. that's it. could someone share a list of related KDE packages which should be installed? Luc

Re: Qt 6.7.2 uploaded to unstable!

Hi Luc, hi. Luc Castermans - 06.10.24, 08:40:38 CEST: > How do I best install it, when I try to install various packages I get > messages like below: You don't. You wait until all necessary Qt 6.7.2 packages are completely built on your architecture. And until all packages affe

Re: Qt 6.7.2 uploaded to unstable!

On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 08:40:38AM +0200, Luc Castermans wrote: > Thansk for the upload. > > How do I best install it, when I try to install various packages I get > messages like below: Just wait until full-upgrade installs it normally. > root@canne:~# apt install qt6-base-private-abi -t experi

Re: Qt 6.7.2 uploaded to unstable!

o Patrick and all the other developers who have been involved to make that happen! The upload of Qt 6.7.2 will unblock quite some other stuff that Qt/KDE team members have been preparing in experimental. Best, -- m.vr.gr. Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com

Qt 6.7.2 uploaded to unstable!

Hi! Take care and as usual wait till apt is happy to upgrade *without* removing your desktop! Many thanks to Patrick and all the other developers who have been involved to make that happen! The upload of Qt 6.7.2 will unblock quite some other stuff that Qt/KDE team members have been

Re: gwenview 24.08.1 hard dependency on Qt 6.7.2?

On 10/1/24 4:06 PM, Shmerl wrote:> Thanks for uploading new gwenview! Does it need to have hard dependency on Qt 6.7.2 (as current package demands) or it can work with 6.6.2? I'm not seeing any hard dependency on 6.7.2. In particular, on my machine, I have gwenview 4:24.08.1-1 instal

gwenview 24.08.1 hard dependency on Qt 6.7.2?

Thanks for uploading new gwenview! Does it need to have hard dependency on Qt 6.7.2 (as current package demands) or it can work with 6.6.2? Currently it's impossible to pull Qt 6.7.2 from experimental into testing without breaking a lot of packages. If Qt 6.7.2 is strictly required, I&#

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

2024 at 11:38 PM Patrick Franz wrote: > > > > Hej, > > > > Am Montag, 2. September 2024, 17:19:38 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > [...] > > > Hmm, I have an idea: > > > > > > kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/K

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

Patrick Franz - 03.09.24, 23:37:39 CEST: > Just upload kio-extras 24.08.0 to experimental as well as an updated > version of dolphin that will now recommend kio-extras 24.08 or higher. > > I hope that solves some of the problems. I confirm that your upload fixes the reported issues. Many thanks,

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

/k/kio-extras/kio-extras_24.08.0-1.dsc On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:38 PM Patrick Franz wrote: > > Hej, > > Am Montag, 2. September 2024, 17:19:38 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > [...] > > Hmm, I have an idea: > > > > kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only con

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

Dear Patrick, On mardi 3 septembre 2024 23:37:39 CEST Patrick Franz wrote: > Hej, > > Am Montag, 2. September 2024, 17:19:38 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > [...] > > Hmm, I have an idea: > > > > kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/KF 5 proto

Re: Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

Just upload kio-extras 24.08.0 to experimental as well as an updated version of dolphin that will now recommend kio-extras 24.08 or higher. I hope that solves some of the problems. Yes it does. Dolphin now works correctly. And the thumbnails for wallpapers in systemsettings do also. Good

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

Patrick Franz - 03.09.24, 23:37:39 CEST: > Am Montag, 2. September 2024, 17:19:38 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > [...] > > kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/KF 5 protocols. > > In there are all the protocols that Dolphin said were missing above

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

Hej, Am Montag, 2. September 2024, 17:19:38 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald: [...] > Hmm, I have an idea: > > kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/KF 5 protocols. > In there are all the protocols that Dolphin said were missing above > and then some. > >

Re: Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

till 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/KF 5 protocols. In there are all the protocols that Dolphin said were missing above and then some. Wait and see then. Thanks for the hints. Have a nice day, -- Eric Valette

Dolphin 24.08 on Plasma 6: protocols in kio-extras Qt 5/KF 5 only (was: Re: Some feedback on KDE6 install)

f.kio.core: couldn't create worker: "Unknown protocol 'fish'." FTP protocol however works okay, like with: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org Hmm, I have an idea: kio-extras is still 4:23.08.4-2 and only contains Qt 5/KF 5 protocols. In there are all the protocols that Dolphin said were missing above and then some. I think once someone has updated KIO related packages things will work again. Best, -- Martin - please no carbon copy to me

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Le dimanche 11 août 2024, 07:27:14 CEST Shmerl a écrit : > Looks like these couple of bugs handle breakage in plasma-desktoptheme > and kwin-data: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078140 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078436 Exact. I’ve just uploaded t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Looks like these couple of bugs handle breakage in plasma-desktoptheme and kwin-data: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078140 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078436 Regards, Shmerl.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Le 6 août 2024 09:32:55 GMT+02:00, Shmerl a écrit : >On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 08:46:11 +0200 Aurélien COUDERC >wrote: > >*> If you could also share your dpkg logs we should be able to see what >happened.* > >I managed to track down some terminal output from dpkg that was stored >in /var/log/apt/ter

Re: Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Le 6 août 2024 03:02:46 GMT+02:00, Shmerl a écrit : >On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 22:03:15 +0200 Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > >> If you don't mind sharing the summary of the apt command (it will show some >> of the packages you've chosen to install), alongside the output of apt >> policy I'd >> still be

Re: Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 22:03:15 +0200 Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > If you don't mind sharing the summary of the apt command (it will show some > of the packages you've chosen to install), alongside the output of apt policy > I'd > still be interested to check that nothing looks amiss. I didn't save t

Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Le 5 août 2024 08:19:45 GMT+02:00, Shmerl a écrit : >Luc Castermans wrote on Mon, 05 Aug 2024 >05:24:37 + > >*> I am happy to confirm above, using Plasma 6 since few weeks, with most >packages from Experimental.* > >*>* >*> Luc* > >I tried doing > >sudo apt install -t experimental plasma-d

Re: Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Hi, indeed, moving over is not straightforward at this moment in time. It is an effort. Aurélien wrote: "happy hacking", which is correct. Luc Shmerl schreef op 5 augustus 2024 06:19:45 UTC: >Luc Castermans wrote on Mon, 05 Aug 2024 >05:24:37 + > >*> I am happy to confirm above, using Plas

Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

"Besides the cosmetic wallpaper preview issue, I don't think we've seen anything really scary so far." I am happy to confirm above, using Plasma 6 since few weeks, with most packages from Experimental. Luc "Aurélien COUDERC" schreef op 4 augustus 2024 21:52:38 UTC: > > >Le 4 août 2024 19:2

Re: Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps QT from experimental

Le 4 août 2024 19:28:04 GMT+02:00, Shmerl a écrit : >Sat, 03 Aug 2024 20:31:37 +0200Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > > >*>> we've both had the issue Patrick and I while having every single >KF6 and Plasma 6 packages installed.* > >So is it close to being pushed to unstable We don't give ETAs, the tea

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Hi Nicholas, Le 4 août 2024 01:12:19 GMT+02:00, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit  : >Hi Aurélien, > > >What I understood was that whoever updated the source package believed >that our new bin:plasma-integration logically provided >plasma5-integration (whether or not it had formal Provides). I found >

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Hi Aurélien, Aurélien COUDERC writes: > Hi, > > Le vendredi 2 août 2024, 05:22:39 CEST Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : >> Shai Berger writes: >> >> > On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:17:17 +0200 >> > Aurélien COUDERC wrote: >> > >> >> Le 1 août 2024 15:59:44 GMT+02:00, Alex Hermann >> >> a écrit : >> >>

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Le 3 août 2024 20:22:50 GMT+02:00, Edward Shornock a écrit : > >Sedat Dilek kirjoitti 22.7.2024 klo 11.49 ap.: >> KDE/apps partly from experimental like konsole - akonadi/kmail etc. >> still works but from unstable. >> >> The upgrade was mostly done manually -

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Sedat Dilek kirjoitti 22.7.2024 klo 11.49 ap.: KDE/apps partly from experimental like konsole - akonadi/kmail etc. still works but from unstable. The upgrade was mostly done manually - some QT packages were required from unstable. I have done the upgrade to Plasma from experimental and

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Hi, Le vendredi 2 août 2024, 05:22:39 CEST Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > Shai Berger writes: > > > On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:17:17 +0200 > > Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > > > >> Le 1 août 2024 15:59:44 GMT+02:00, Alex Hermann > >> a écrit : > >> > > >> >Yes, thanks. plasma5-integration was the missi

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Shai Berger writes: > On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:17:17 +0200 > Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > >> Le 1 août 2024 15:59:44 GMT+02:00, Alex Hermann >> a écrit : >> > >> >Yes, thanks. plasma5-integration was the missing bit. >> > >> >Maybe some packages need a depend/recommend on this package. As of >> >now

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:17:17 +0200 Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > Le 1 août 2024 15:59:44 GMT+02:00, Alex Hermann > a écrit : > > > >Yes, thanks. plasma5-integration was the missing bit. > > > >Maybe some packages need a depend/recommend on this package. As of > >now, it stands completely on its own.

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

if I remember correctly) by some >> integration layer that uses the "hooks" provided by Qt to extend the >> behavior. If you use Plasma, that's done by plasma-integration. > >Yes, thanks. plasma5-integration was the missing bit. > >Maybe some packages need a depend/

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

age? > > The special feature are provided (if I remember correctly) by some > integration layer that uses the "hooks" provided by Qt to extend the > behavior. If you use Plasma, that's done by plasma-integration. Yes, thanks. plasma5-integration was the missing bit. M

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Alex Hermann ha scritto: > On maandag 22 juli 2024 10:49:48 CEST Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Then I was able to enjoy the new KDE plasma-desktop version 6.1. > >> The upgrade was mostly done manually - some QT packages were required >> from unstable. > > I tried it too. U

Re: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

On maandag 22 juli 2024 10:49:48 CEST Sedat Dilek wrote: > Then I was able to enjoy the new KDE plasma-desktop version 6.1. > The upgrade was mostly done manually - some QT packages were required > from unstable. I tried it too. Unfortunately, I found that the file dialogs in kate, ok

Fwd: KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

got it! Besturingssysteem: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma-versie: 6.1.0 Versie van KDE-Frameworks: 6.4.0 Qt-versie: 6.6.2 Kernel-versie: 6.9.9-amd64 (64-bits) Grafisch platform: X11 Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor Geheugen: 31,3 GiB

KDE/Frameworks/Plasma/Apps + QT from experimental

Hi, just as an info: $ kinfo Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 6.1.0 KDE Frameworks Version: 6.4.0 Qt Version: 6.6.2 Kernel Version: 6.9.10-amd64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: Wayland Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i5-2467M CPU @ 1.60GHz Memory: 7.7 GiB of RAM Graphics

Re: QT target version for trixie

Hi! On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 08:07, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Cc'd the mailing list I mentioned below. > > Alexandre Rossi - 03.07.24, 12:29:06 CEST: > > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) > > > > Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the tar

Re: QT target version for trixie

Cc'd the mailing list I mentioned below. Alexandre Rossi - 03.07.24, 12:29:06 CEST: > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) > > Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the target version of > QT for trixie? Should an application build against QT5 or QT6? > >

Re: QT target version for trixie

Alexandre Rossi - 03.07.24, 12:29:06 CEST: > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) > > Hi, > > Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the target version of > QT for trixie? Should an application build against QT5 or QT6? > > I have not been able to find

QT target version for trixie

(Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) Hi, Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the target version of QT for trixie? Should an application build against QT5 or QT6? I have not been able to find that information. Thanks, Alex

Re: Qt upgrade

Hi, Thanks for the pointer. After a full-upgrade to latest packages in Debian/unstable AMD64, kinfocenter says: Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12 KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.11 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.115.0 Qt Version: 5.15.13 Kernel Version: 6.8.10-1-amd64-clang18-kcfi (64-bit) Graphics

Re: Qt upgrade

Aurélien COUDERC - 23.05.24, 11:50:08 CEST: > Le 23 mai 2024 10:09:29 GMT+02:00, Andrey Rakhmatullin > a écrit : > >On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:44:10AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > >> The new apt 2.9 and later makes it really obvious, so maybe warnings > >> like this are no longer needed? >

Re: Qt upgrade

Le 23 mai 2024 10:09:29 GMT+02:00, Andrey Rakhmatullin a écrit : >On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:44:10AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> The new apt 2.9 and later makes it really obvious, so maybe warnings like >> this are no longer needed? >It was always obvious *shrug* Must depend on your

Re: Qt upgrade

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:44:10AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > The new apt 2.9 and later makes it really obvious, so maybe warnings like > this are no longer needed? It was always obvious *shrug* -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Qt upgrade

Hi! Unstable users already saw it, I bet: There is a Qt upgrade ongoing. As usual watch output of apt carefully and wait with full-upgrade until Qt related package building is complete. The new apt 2.9 and later makes it really obvious, so maybe warnings like this are no longer needed? I

Re: Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

I agree that it would be a good idea to discuss this in a central location where the largest number of hunspell maintainers are likely to see the discussion and a general consensus can be reached. As I don’t see a mailing list for either Hunspell or for dictionaries in general, I have filed a

Re: Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

@Agustin: context: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2022/09/msg00011.html ff. Hi again, Am 20.09.22 um 20:02 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 20.09.22 um 18:38 schrieb Soren Stoutner: I did speak to the maintainer of the English hunspell packages (Don Armstrong), which are based on the sc

Re: Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

languages do much coordination with each other. There's no big coordination here, but they follow above policy. This is his patch that enables the building of the Qt WebEngine binary dictionaries: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?p=deb_pkgs/scowl.git;a=commitd

Re: Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

sh > > package and then reach out to the maintainers of the other Hunspell > languages and offer assistance to add the Qt WebEngine dictionaries to > their packages as well. > > > One could have also talked to the hunspell maintainer I did speak to the maintainer of the

Re: Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

Hi, Am 18.09.22 um 00:32 schrieb Soren Stoutner: I noticed that Debian does not currently ship packages for Qt WebEngine dictionaries.  Qt WebEngine can use Hunspell dictionaries compiled into a special binary format using qwebengine_convert_dict from the qtwebengine5-dev-tools package

Package Qt WebEngine dictionaries

I am developing a Qt WebEngine based web browser named Privacy Browser. https://www.stoutner.com/privacy-browser-pc/[1] Currently it is in pre-alpha, but it will soon reach an alpha release stage, at which point I would like to package it for Debian. I noticed that Debian does not currently

Qt WebEngine subpixel antialiasing regression?

Hi all, I'm wondering if anyone else is experiencing this: Qt WebEngine text content is not getting subpixel antialiasing, even though subpixel antialiasing works correctly most other places (including other Qt/KDE widgets). For me I notice the problem particularly affects Falkon and KMa

Re: Plasma 5.19.5 and Qt 5.15 in unstable

great news. Thanks for all efforts to all involved! Luc Op za 7 nov. 2020 10:04 schreef Martin Steigerwald : > Hi! > > Qt 5.15 is completely in unstable now and already also migrated to > testing. kdevelop had to be uninstalled on my system, but I bet a fix > will be coming soon

Plasma 5.19.5 and Qt 5.15 in unstable

Hi! Qt 5.15 is completely in unstable now and already also migrated to testing. kdevelop had to be uninstalled on my system, but I bet a fix will be coming soon enough as well. Now Plasma 5.19.5 is also coming. As always just wait till apt dist-upgrade is safe to do. If you previously used

Re: Plasma packages from experimental and Qt 5.15.1 transition

Hey, > As I was impatient, I rebuilt a few packages from the sources previously in > experimental. > I had to do one change for kwin-common to depend on the binary version > instead of the source version. I do not yet have an account in the Debian > Salsa server. Should I proceed and submit a merg

Re: Plasma packages from experimental and Qt 5.15.1 transition

Hello Norbert, On lundi 2 novembre 2020 03:45:50 CET Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Matthieu, > > > rebuilt but I would like to know if it is planned to have experimental > > packages rebuilt against Qt 5.15.1 ? > > We just uploaded a set of packages to experimental that

Re: Plasma packages from experimental and Qt 5.15.1 transition

Hi Matthieu, > rebuilt but I would like to know if it is planned to have experimental > packages rebuilt against Qt 5.15.1 ? We just uploaded a set of packages to experimental that should than be rebuilt with Qt 5.15. I'm currentlu suing them sucessfully. Finding a part to upgr

Re: Plasma packages from experimental and Qt 5.15.1 transition

Hi Matthieu, > rebuilt but I would like to know if it is planned to have experimental > packages rebuilt against Qt 5.15.1 ? We just uploaded a set of packages to experimental that should than be rebuilt with Qt 5.15. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert

Plasma packages from experimental and Qt 5.15.1 transition

Hello, so far, it seems that almost all packages involved in the transition have been rebuilt but I would like to know if it is planned to have experimental packages rebuilt against Qt 5.15.1 ? This is my problem and not your problem but I would be curious to know what I will have to do on my

Re: Stepping down as Qt 6 maintainers

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 11:11, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > I was asked if this move has anything to do with code quality or > licensing. The answer is a huge no, Qt is a **great** project which we > love. As stated before it's mostly about lack of free

Re: Stepping down as Qt 6 maintainers

I was asked if this move has anything to do with code quality or licensing. The answer is a huge no, Qt is a **great** project which we love. As stated before it's mostly about lack of free time to properly maintain it. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/

Stepping down as Qt 6 maintainers

After quite some time maintaining Qt in Debian both Dmitry Shachnev and I decided to not maintain Qt 6 when it's published (expected in December 2020, see https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_6.0_Release). We will do our best to keep the Qt 5 codebase up and running. We **love** Qt, but it's a huge co

Status of Qt 6 (was: Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?)

Dear Marco, Marco Möller - 07.07.20, 19:28:52 CEST: > Looking also at the signature of your mail, I assume that you might > have some insights also on the general situation. I am wondering > about Qt itself moving to version 6 and having announced to change > the license conditions

Re: Qt 5.14.2 coming to unstable

Hi Martin, thanks for the friendly pre-info. This Friday June 26th I switched over to Qt 5.14.2 in Debian/testing AMD64. Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux KDE Plasma Version: 5.17.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.70.0 Qt Version: 5.14.2 Kernel Version: 5.7.0-1-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4

Qt 5.14.2 coming to unstable

Hi! As usual wait with dist-upgrade till complete. Thanks to everyone involved with making that happen! Best, -- Martin

Bug for Qt Quick Controls2 with some styles

x86_64 host, and Qt executable is running inside a chrooted rootfilesystem and it is using X syscalls to display its gui. On the x86_64 side, I have to use "xhost +" to accept connection from the chrooted system. When running my application which uses QtQuickControl2 with the styl

Re: Issues with a Qt project and modules

On 6/8/20 12:59 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:13:17 CEST, gianluca ha scritto: On 6/6/20 8:31 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: Hi, please use debian-kde@ as support list. debian-qt-kde@ is the packaging list that gets the bug reports and the uploads/migrations only. Thanks

Re: Issues with a Qt project and modules

In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:13:17 CEST, gianluca ha scritto: > On 6/6/20 8:31 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please use debian-kde@ as support list. debian-qt-kde@ is the packaging > > list that gets the bug reports and the uploads/migrations only. > &

Re: Issues with a Qt project and modules

On 6/6/20 8:31 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: Hi, please use debian-kde@ as support list. debian-qt-kde@ is the packaging list that gets the bug reports and the uploads/migrations only. In data venerdì 5 giugno 2020 10:45:38 CEST, gianluca ha scritto: Hello list, I am trying to port a Qt project a

Re: Issues with a Qt project and modules

Hi, please use debian-kde@ as support list. debian-qt-kde@ is the packaging list that gets the bug reports and the uploads/migrations only. In data venerdì 5 giugno 2020 10:45:38 CEST, gianluca ha scritto: > Hello list, > I am trying to port a Qt project a friend of mine is developing

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >