debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Cc: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: debian-faq in NEW - or: remove documentation from the archive at
> all
> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 07:54:47 +0800
>
> On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 20:52 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> > Maybe in a next uploa
Hi,
Am 6. April 2022 06:40:54 MESZ schrieb "Joost van Baal-Ilić"
:
>
>Luckily ftp-masters in the mean time did accept the faq upload. Thanks!
Yes, That's great. Many thanks
Now I can look into activating the new Portuguese translation
on the website (which is one major point in this upload, an
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 07:54:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 20:52 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> > Maybe in a next upload of debian-faq, we could get rid of this by-hand
> > stuff.
> > Afaik it's only used to get the FAQ content published at
> > https://ftp.debi
On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 20:52 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Maybe in a next upload of debian-faq, we could get rid of this by-hand stuff.
> Afaik it's only used to get the FAQ content published at
> https://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/
I think it would be better to send a dak patch turning the
Hi,
Samuel Thibault schreef op maandag 4 april 2022:
> the byhand queue is quite different from the new
> queue, possibly there are very few ftpmaster who actually know how to
> process it.
Maybe in a next upload of debian-faq, we could get rid of this by-hand stuff.
Afaik it's only used to get t
Package: debian-faq
Severity: normal
Hi Sebul,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 05:07:34AM +0900, sebul / https://sebuls.blogspot.kr
wrote:
> Hello.
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/support.en.html#s12.2.5
> 12.2.5. Usenet newsgroups
> say Linux Online and LinuxJournal
> But these links say
Hi sebul,
sebul wrote (Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:53:47 +0900):
> I added ko at Makefile to add a korean translation.
> I run make updatepo.
> I edited *.po files in the ko/ directory.
> I don't know why other files changed.
> Help me please.
Hmm, the changes to the en and debian directory are from comm
Hello. joostvb
2021년 10월 7일 (목) 오후 2:15, Joost van Baal-Ilić 님이 작성:
>
> Hi Sebul,
>
> Wow! That's an impressive amount of work, thanks for that!
>
> The translation is not complete yet, did I see that correctly? (Hrm... maybe
> it is complete enough to ship it anyway, improvements can also come
Hi Sebul,
Wow! That's an impressive amount of work, thanks for that!
The translation is not complete yet, did I see that correctly? (Hrm... maybe
it is complete enough to ship it anyway, improvements can also come after the
first public release of this translation.)
And I saw you also changed
Version: 10.0
Wang Gary wrote:
> There is a typo in /usr/share/doc/debian/FAQ/zh_CN/ch-pkg_basics.zh-cn.html
> at line 474, which spell debian as debina, which should be fixed.
After conversion to DocBook in version 10.0, this is no longer valid.
So closing this bug.
Holger
--
Holger Wansin
Version: 10.0
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Section 6.2.2 "D'où proviennent les noms de code ?" contains:
> > wheezy est le nom du manchot au n½ud papillon rouge
> "noeud" really reads "n½ud". This is surely due to the ligature, since it
> isn't an ASCII character, yet all other characters are fine
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > +The service file /lib/systemd/rc.local.service
> > > > provides an easy way to
> > >
> > > Uh, there is no such file, at least on my system,
>
> I have systemd 232-25+deb9u1 installed, which gets shipped with Debian 9.1
> stretch; this systemd ships /lib/syst
Hi again Justin e.a.,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:40:54PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> > Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > +Instead of runlevels, as used on traditional
> [...]
> > > > +
> > > > +S
Hi Justin,
Applied, up to:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > +Instead of runlevels, as used on traditional
[...]
> > > +
> > > +Service file /lib/systemd/rc.local.service provides an easy
> > > way to
> >
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > +Instead of runlevels, as used on traditional
> > +System-V style Unix systems, systemd provides targets. You may
> > check
> > +the default target by the command
>
> This seems in need of a little "intro" phrase:
>
> +To control the ord
Hi Vincent e.a.,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:37:27PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
>
> I have a few suggestions.
Great, thanks for proofreading: very helpful for a non-native speaker like me :)
Have applied all your suggestions as-is, except for:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:36:53AM +0100, Joos
Hello Joost
I have a few suggestions.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:36:53AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
> I've now finally comitted some text. I've also used
> https://bugs.debian.org/#787152 : a nice patch contributed by Alan Lee.
>
> I feel some proofreading is needed here.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:04:29PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> > Current Debian FAQ in SVN says, in customizing.sgml :
> >
> > Every distribution seems to have a different boot-up
> > method. Tell me about Debian's.
> >
> > Like all Unices, Debian b
On Sat, 7 May 2016 03:29:28 +0900
victory wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> it says:
> Where is pine?
> Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area.
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pine.html
> [2010-02-13] pine REMOVED from testing (Britney)
>
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > while translating the debian-faq into German I found two things that should
> > be changed IMO:
> [...]
> > -mustn't have dependencies that make them uninstallable; they also need have
> > +mustn't have dependencies that make them uninstallable;
Holger Wansing wrote:
> while translating the debian-faq into German I found two things that should
> be changed IMO:
[...]
> -mustn't have dependencies that make them uninstallable; they also need have
> +mustn't have dependencies that make them uninstallable; they also need to
> have
[...]
> -
Hi,
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current Debian FAQ in SVN says, in customizing.sgml :
>
> Every distribution seems to have a different boot-up
> method. Tell me about Debian's.
>
> Like all Unices, Debian boots up by executing the program init
> As of this writing, the unstable
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > victory and Justin,
> >
> > thanks for your suggestions. They are more than welcome. I will commit that
> > soon.
>
> Proposed patch attached.
Just applied.
Holger
--
===
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> victory and Justin,
>
> thanks for your suggestions. They are more than welcome. I will commit that
> soon.
Proposed patch attached.
Holger
--
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> victory wrote:
>>> #: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:133
>>> To list all packages, for which newer package versions are available, run:
>>>
>>> 2nd "package" is redundant
>>
>> And by English punctuation rules the comma shouldn't be there either.
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> victory wrote:
> > #: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:133
> > To list all packages, for which newer package versions are available, run:
> >
> > 2nd "package" is redundant
>
> And by English punctuation rules the comma shouldn't be there either.
Sorry: the first or t
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> victory wrote:
> > #: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:133
> > To list all packages, for which newer package versions are available, run:
> >
> > 2nd "package" is redundant
>
> And by English punctuation rules the comma shouldn't be there either.
>
> > #: debian-faq.
victory wrote:
> #: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:133
> To list all packages, for which newer package versions are available, run:
>
> 2nd "package" is redundant
And by English punctuation rules the comma shouldn't be there either.
> #: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:272
> The Debian insta
#: debian-faq.sgml:44 choosing.sgml:259
there wont be
will not|won't
#: debian-faq.sgml:44 choosing.sgml:318
But when &testingreleasename; becomes stable,
you will still be tracking &testingreleasename;.
+even
#: debian-faq.sgml:49 pkgtools.sgml:95
..
apt-get autoremove -> apt auto
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> > 6.9 Where is the source code?
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Due to restrictions in their licenses, source code may or may not
> > be available for packages in the "contrib" and "non-free" areas,
> > which are not formally part of the Debian system. In s
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Couldn't we go back to something closer to what's currently there?
> Instead of one paragraphs about Pine and then another about
> contrib/non-free (which seems like the wrong order anyway), we could
> have one that says:
That was exactly what I had in mind when proposi
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:42:36AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Editing slip:
>
> Justin B Rye wrote:
> > Due to restrictions in their licenses, source code may or may not
> > be available for packages in the "contrib" and "non-free" areas,
> > which are not formally part of the Debian
Editing slip:
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Due to restrictions in their licenses, source code may or may not
> be available for packages in the "contrib" and "non-free" areas,
> which are not formally part of the Debian system. In some cases
> only sourceless "binary blobs" can be
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Due to restrictions in their licenses source code may or may not
^
Here I'd suggest adding a comma.
> be available for packages in the "contrib" and "non-free" directories,
> which are not formally part of
I agree. There is no need to write extensively on nvidia-* packages and
both the Flash plugin and Broadcom drivers should be sufficient examples.
~ Andy
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hendrik
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:50:45PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:50:25PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > It might be useful, to document these two szenarios, so here we go:
> > >
> > >
> > > Due to restrictions in their licenses s
Hi,
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:50:25PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > It might be useful, to document these two szenarios, so here we go:
> >
> >
> > Due to restrictions in their licenses source code may or may not
> > be available for packages in the "contrib"
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:50:25PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrzej Bylicki wrote:
> > Per notable examples, I would also mention the broadcom-sta driver
> > (non-free, but available as source code, pulled from upstream [Broadcom])
> > and the Adobe Flash plugin (non-free and only a
Hi,
Andrzej Bylicki wrote:
> Per notable examples, I would also mention the broadcom-sta driver
> (non-free, but available as source code, pulled from upstream [Broadcom])
> and the Adobe Flash plugin (non-free and only available as binary 'blob',
> pulled from upstream [Adobe]).
>
> Broadcom wi
Per notable examples, I would also mention the broadcom-sta driver
(non-free, but available as source code, pulled from upstream [Broadcom])
and the Adobe Flash plugin (non-free and only available as binary 'blob',
pulled from upstream [Adobe]).
Broadcom wireless adapters are popular and Flash is
Hi,
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Justin B Rye wrote:
> > > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > >>Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the
> > > >> restrictions
> > >
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:36:25PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the
> >> restrictions
> >>in their licenses. Notably, one such package is pine, see
> >> for more informatio
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Justin B Rye wrote:
> > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >> Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the
> > >> restrictions
> > >> in their licenses. Notably, one such package i
On Sat, 7 May 2016 21:45:43 +0200
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hmm, if there are only few of such packages, that topic is probably not
> worth a frequently asked question (FAQ)?
> So skip the whole sentence?
or, if pine IS what frequently asked about,
then you can say it is not now, removed in 2010
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the
> >> restrictions
> >>in their licenses. Notably, one such package is pine, see
> >> for more information.
> >>
> >> So if we remove pine f
Hi,
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > victory wrote:
> > I would remove the pine stuff completely.
> >
> > However, pine is also mentioned as an example for nonfree software in
> > ftparchives.sgml:
> >
> > Some packages are on
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the
>> restrictions
>> in their licenses. Notably, one such package is pine, see
>> for more information.
>>
>> So if we remove pine from the doc, we need another example
Hi,
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> victory wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200
> > Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > it says:
> > Where is pine?
> > Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area.
> >
> > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pine
Hi,
victory wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200
> Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> it says:
> Where is pine?
> Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area.
>
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pine.html
> [2010-02-13] pine REMOVED from testing (Britney)
> [2010-02-12] Removed 4.
On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:00:48 +0200
Holger Wansing wrote:
it says:
Where is pine?
Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pine.html
[2010-02-13] pine REMOVED from testing (Britney)
[2010-02-12] Removed 4.64-4 from unstable (Torsten Werner)
so t
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Should we add a table which lists all the new apt commands and their old
> > apt-get / apt-cache variants in comparison?
> > Maybe that would make sense, since you are not always done with simply
> > replacing "apt-get" with "apt". T
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Should we add a table which lists all the new apt commands and their old
> apt-get / apt-cache variants in comparison?
> Maybe that would make sense, since you are not always done with simply
> replacing "apt-get" with "apt". There are cases, which are not that intuiti
Hi,
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:20:31PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > now the fourth patch, which documents the new apt command, as an
> > > >
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:20:31PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >
> > > now the fourth patch, which documents the new apt command, as an
> > > alternative for apt-get / apt-cache.
> > >
> >
[ BTW: no need to CC me. ]
Hi,
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > now the fourth patch, which documents the new apt command, as an
> > alternative for apt-get / apt-cache.
> >
> > My approach is, to list both va
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > --- pkgtools.sgml (Revision 11106)
> > +++ pkgtools.sgml (Arbeitskopie)
> > @@ -72,6 +72,17 @@
> > /usr/share/doc/apt-doc/guide.html/index.html (you will have to
> > install
> > the apt-doc package).
> >
> > +Please note that starting w
Hi Holger,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> now the fourth patch, which documents the new apt command, as an
> alternative for apt-get / apt-cache.
>
> My approach is, to list both variants in examples, means the old
> apt-get command, and the new apt command.
Holger Wansing wrote:
> --- pkgtools.sgml (Revision 11106)
> +++ pkgtools.sgml (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -72,6 +72,17 @@
> /usr/share/doc/apt-doc/guide.html/index.html (you will have to
> install
> the apt-doc package).
>
> +Please note that starting with Debian Jessie, the most popular
> +
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > These are included in the attached diff.
> >
>
> So i will commit that diff shortly.
Done.
--
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 8 .
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> These are included in the attached diff.
>
So i will commit that diff shortly.
Holger
--
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " .
Registered Linux U
Hi,
victory wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:14:43 +0200
> Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> > Starting with Stretch, apt-get and apt-cache calls are changed and
> > can also be called directly simply via apt:
> > apt update
> > apt upgrade
> > apt full-upgrade
> > apt remove pkg
> > apt install pkg
> > a
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:14:43 +0200
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Starting with Stretch, apt-get and apt-cache calls are changed and
> can also be called directly simply via apt:
> apt update
> apt upgrade
> apt full-upgrade
> apt remove pkg
> apt install pkg
> apt show pkg
> apt search str
apt upgrade s
Hi,
appart from the above mentioned changes, I came to this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813677
I have adopted some of the things proposed there by Markus Hiereth (in CC):
(Best regards, Markus :-) Many thanks again )
- decission
+ decision
- instered
+ interested
- w
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>> Removing some of that questions would be good indeed.
> >>
> >> Or indeed adding new ones. Newcomers probably have questions these
> >> days about things the FAQ is too old to know anything about, like
> >> systemd, or wifi firmware, or mult
Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> Removing some of that questions would be good indeed.
>>
>> Or indeed adding new ones. Newcomers probably have questions these
>> days about things the FAQ is too old to know anything about, like
>> systemd, or wifi firmware, or multiarch, or even Ubuntu.
>
> Yes, but a
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> >> Comments below; meanwhile I should go and have a look at the full FAQ.
> >> Yes, its answers badly need revising; but in principle we ought to be
> >> doing something much more invasive, replacing Questions that are no
> >> longer Frequently As
Holger Wansing wrote:
>> Comments below; meanwhile I should go and have a look at the full FAQ.
>> Yes, its answers badly need revising; but in principle we ought to be
>> doing something much more invasive, replacing Questions that are no
>> longer Frequently Asked.
>
> Removing some of that ques
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > now the third patch to address more invasive things:
> >
> > - I have updated info on release architectures
> > - I removed/changed paragraphs about floppies (still someone using them?
> > :-) )
> > - I changed the description of apt (copied f
Holger Wansing wrote:
> now the third patch to address more invasive things:
>
> - I have updated info on release architectures
> - I removed/changed paragraphs about floppies (still someone using them? :-) )
> - I changed the description of apt (copied from official package-description
> from p
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after patch1 for fixing typos etc. here is now patch2 to improve wording or
> meaning, consistent use of terms in similar situations, etc.
>
> Most of these changings also require translators work afterwards.
>
>
> I would appreciate review and comments.
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote:
[...]
> appropriate, it would be called LDP! So I'd suggest:
>
>the Linux FAQ, by id="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/";>,
ok.
[...]
> >> (Do people think of etch-a-sketches as blackboards? For a start,
> >> isn't it more of a whiteboard?)
> >
>
Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> + The Linux FAQ, by >> id="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/";>,
>> ^
>> I'm not sure about the item-initial capitalisation here - if we're
>> treating "The Linux FAQ" as a title, shouldn't it be in quotes or
>> something?
>
> I don't see the globall
Hi,
Beatrice Torracca wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016, at 19:20 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for working on updating this and other documents. I have some minor
> comments:
>
> > ===
> > --- ftparchives.sgml
Hi,
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >many developers, volunteers, and beta testers, and
> > - the flaky memories of its authors. :-)
> > - Kamaraju Kusumanchi's > id="http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/debian_choosing_distribution.html";>,
> > who graciously made it GPL so I could include
Hi Justin,
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
[...]
> > Parts of the information came from:
> >
> > - The Debian-1.1 release announcement, by > id="http://www.perens.com/";>.
> > - The Linux FAQ, by > id="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/";>.
> > + The Debian-1.1 relea
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:20:07PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
[...]
> I would appreciate review and comments.
Apart from Beatrice and Justin's thoughtfull comments: here are my € 0,02.
> Index: faqinfo.sgml
> ===
>
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I would appreciate review and comments.
[...]
> Index: faqinfo.sgml
> ===
> --- faqinfo.sgml (Revision 10939)
> +++ faqinfo.sgml (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -12,14 +12,14 @@
>
> Parts of the information ca
On Tuesday 29 March 2016, at 19:20 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
thanks for working on updating this and other documents. I have some minor
comments:
> ===
> --- ftparchives.sgml (Revision 10939)
> +++ ftparchives.sgml (Arbeit
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:46:56PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "Osamu Aoki" :
> >"Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml.
>
> Between 2008-05-19 and 2008-10-03, I created a docbookified,
> po4aified, and utf8ifed branch of the FAQ:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddp/manual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-09-2008 03:13, Joost van Baal wrote:
[...]
> translators for updates (if we don't get any reply within a reasonable
> timeframe, I'll remove those packages). And I'm optimistic about
> getting updates of the
>
> es, pt_BR
>
> translations. I
On 2008-09-24 15:18, Joost van Baal wrote:
> That'd be great!
Done. I took the liberty of re-phrasing: "..., qmail nor ezmlm is
shipped..." into: "..., neither qmail nor ezmlm are shipped..."
Feel free to correct my pseudo-English in SVN :~)
(Btw: I would like to make use of the DocBook elements
Hi!
Op Wed 24 Sep 2008 om 03:07:22 +0200 schreef W. Martin Borgert:
> On 2008-09-24 14:14, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Yes, it's OK, but I believe it's better to wait untill the manual
> > merging has been done. See W. Martin Borgert's Mon, 22 Sep 2008
> > message.
>
> You didn't answer
A yes, ju
On 2008-09-24 14:14, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Yes, it's OK, but I believe it's better to wait untill the manual
> merging has been done. See W. Martin Borgert's Mon, 22 Sep 2008
> message.
You didn't answer (or I did not get the answer), whether the
small change in software.sgml was the only relev
Hi,
Op Wed 24 Sep 2008 om 02:04:15 +0200 schreef Johan Haggi:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:21:21AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Op Wed 24 Sep 2008 om 09:59:10 +0200 schreef Johan Haggi:
> > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:13:16AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > I'd li
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:21:21AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> Hi Johan!
> Op Wed 24 Sep 2008 om 09:59:10 +0200 schreef Johan Haggi:
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:13:16AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I'd like to especially ask the
> > > zh_CN, it
> > > translators f
Hi Johan!
Op Wed 24 Sep 2008 om 09:59:10 +0200 schreef Johan Haggi:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:13:16AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'd like to especially ask the
> > zh_CN, it
> > translators for updates
>
> Hi,
> I and other members of debian-l10n-italian are working on It
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:13:16AM (GMT+0200), Joost van Baal wrote:
> [...]
> I'd like to especially ask the
> zh_CN, it
> translators for updates
Hi,
I and other members of debian-l10n-italian are working on Italian
updates.
> (if we don't get any reply within a reasonable
> timeframe, I'll re
On 2008-09-22 08:13, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Since june, there has been some work done on the "old" debian-faq
> branch. Is the dbk-po4a-utf8 branch ready for translators now, or is
> some manual merging needed first?
The latter. If I'm not totally wrong, we need to update
everything from 2008-05
Hi,
Op Mon 2 Jun 2008 om 05:04:43 +0200 schreef W. Martin Borgert:
>
> under
> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/branches/debian-faq/dbk-po4a-utf8
> is a Debian FAQ, converted to DocBook XML + PO4A + UTF-8. I
> would like to invite everyone to try out/review this branch.
>
> Notes:
>
>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:04:43PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> - de, fr, it, and zh_CN are converted to PO, because we actually
> build those
>
> - es, pl, pt_BR, ru, and uk are currently not used, so I did not
> yet convert them to PO
I added po files for es. Translators desperately nee
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Op Sat 24 May 2008 om 10:28:15 +0200 schreef Simon Paillard:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:56:41AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > I plan to upload a new debian-faq package (version 4.0.1) within about a
> > > week. It fixes ser
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:56:41PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 23/05/2008, at 12:11 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>> I'm not very optimistic about having the new DocBook/UTF-8/po4a
>> FAQ ready for lenny. The po conversion of existing translations
>> (diverging a lot from the English version)
Hi Simon,
Op Sat 24 May 2008 om 10:28:15 +0200 schreef Simon Paillard:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:56:41AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > I plan to upload a new debian-faq package (version 4.0.1) within about a
> > week. It fixes serious bug #479915.
> >
> > So, if you'd like to get any other
Hello Joost,
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:56:41AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> I plan to upload a new debian-faq package (version 4.0.1) within about a
> week. It fixes serious bug #479915.
>
> So, if you'd like to get any other changes (translation updates, e.g.)
> in: now is the time. For the
On 23/05/2008, at 12:11 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:22:13PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
Great. I'll work with Martin and see how we go. I see he already has
directories for the existing languages in dbk-po4a-utf8: all I need
is
the POT file, to get started.
Th
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Really? It's not below svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq.
Sorry, I removed the quote line from Joost about the location:
manuals/branches/debian-faq/dbk-po4a-utf8/.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:41:02PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:22:13PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> > Great. I'll work with Martin and see how we go. I see he already has
> > directories for the existing languages in dbk-po4a-utf8: all I need is
> > the POT fi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:22:13PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Great. I'll work with Martin and see how we go. I see he already has
> directories for the existing languages in dbk-po4a-utf8: all I need is
> the POT file, to get started.
The pot files are now under po4a.
An empty vi director
On 22/05/2008, at 3:34 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
Hi,
Op Thu 22 May 2008 om 02:35:00 +0930 schreef Clytie Siddall:
On 18/05/2008, at 3:26 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
Hi,
I plan to upload a new debian-faq package (version 4.0.1) within
about
a
week. It fixes serious bug #479915.
So, if y
Hi,
Op Thu 22 May 2008 om 02:35:00 +0930 schreef Clytie Siddall:
>
> On 18/05/2008, at 3:26 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to upload a new debian-faq package (version 4.0.1) within about
>> a
>> week. It fixes serious bug #479915.
>>
>> So, if you'd like to get any other changes
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
