Review Request for 4.1 Documentation ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-890)

Hi Marcus, Here is the patch for your review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/ Thank you -Radhika

Re: Review Request: Document add/remove network on a VM features

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/ --- (Updated March 4, 2013, 8:23 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

> On March 2, 2013, 1:10 a.m., edison su wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java, > > line 802 > > > > > > Wondering, what's the purpose of network.bridge.

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

> On March 1, 2013, 7:36 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Dave, looks good. > > > > Couple of questions though, there is some bridge specific code in > > LibvirtComputingResource that checks existence of interfaces and such. > > Shouldn't that code also be modified to support multiple drivers

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1262: update default built-in systemvm.iso search patch to be consistent with RPM location

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9728/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers and Kelven Yang. Description --

RE: How do we meter IPSEC data separate from other data for Remote Access VPN

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Sunday, 3 March 2013 12:53 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: Re: How do we meter IPSEC data separate from other data for > Remote Access VPN > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2

Overriding PublicNetworkGuru

Hi, In our MidoNet virtual networking plugin [1], we are planning to override the PublicNetworkGuru with our own version. As far as I can see, no one has yet done this, so I'd like to sanity check our approach. *[Mechanism]* Create a MidonetPublicNetworkGuru, which extends the PublicNetworkGuru.

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

On Mar 4, 2013, at 12:44 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> To close this thread: >> >> I fixed this with help from Chiradeep at ApacheCon. >> >> Basically the 4.0.1 branch does not have the devcloud.sql statements that >> are now in tools/d

Re: About intergrating IDS/IPS to CloudStack

On Mar 3, 2013, at 4:05 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > I'm interesting in integrate IDS/IPS to CloudStack, but didn't find any > effective solution. If you want to use the traditional NIDS, you'll can not > know what do VMs talk each other because this is virtual network. > Otherwise, if you use HID

RE: CLOUDSTACK-83

Hi Dan, Following bug was fixed last week which enabled support for xcp 1.6 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-416. Not sure if anyone is testing xcp 1.6 against cloudstack 4.1 though. If you are facing issues on cloudstack 4.1 with xcp 1.6, you can raise bugs for it and someone c

Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> I stated my opinion on this previously [1], but for the record again: >> >> I would suggest that we only do bug-fix releases for: >> >> - The latest feature release of our active maj

Upgrade bug for 2.2.14 to 4.0.x

Hi, It seems that folks are facing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 When trying to upgrade from old 2.2.14 to 4.0.x Can anyone share step by step process for upgrade ? thanks, -Sebastien

Re: Console Access via API

On Feb 15, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Antonio Petrocelli wrote: > Thanks Sebastien, > > i know where is the API key. > > I means that there is no API KEY inside the string request that Kelven gived > to me. Antonio, sorry for the delay, did you look at: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en

Re: XCP 1.6 problem on CS master branch

On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > I found that the problem is XCP returned "RPC call back failed" when CS > required to allocate a volume for systemVM. Anyone can help? Or maybe the > newest code hasn't fixed this bug. > Maybe you are running into: https://issues.apache.org

Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for IP Range Reservation within a network

I reviewed the test cases and looks good. Please plan to add the following scenarios: * Restart of network when cleanup is set to true, should result in removal of reservation. * Include cases for IP Reservation when AutoScale is configured. * Reset of Reservation happens when guestvmci

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project

On Mar 1, 2013, at 7:22 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > Writing this email to get a feel of what community thinks of creating > CloudStack spins. Basically, in my case I have a need for some features that > are in 4.2 master branch but are not available in 4.1 code base. > > > While I wholehear

RE: [DISCUSS] fixing the tomcat situation, post 4.1?

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: maandag 4 maart 2013 6:03 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] fixing the tomcat situation, post 4.1? > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Noa Resare wrote: > > So, when working with th

RE: (CLOUDSTACK-705) IP Address reservation within a network -UI enhancements Merged

The IP Address Reservation UI enhancements have been added to asf/master . Here is the ticket tracking it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1493 This completes the entire feature and is now available for documentation and QA to pick it up . Thanks, Pranav -Original Messa

RE: git commit: refs/heads/4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-1469 Commit 2f135be1 introduced jna as a dependency for hypervisor kvm, so make sure the version from the operating system is not used anymore (cherry picke

Hey Chip, Of course! Will stick to the agreed process from now on :-) Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 maart 2013 15:07 > To: > Subject: Re: git commit: refs/heads/4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-1469 Commit > 2f135be1 introd

Re: [ACS42][QA] Test plan for SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

Hi, I have reviewed the test cases and looks good. Since UI has been removed from this feature now, We have to make change in the test cases accordingly. Now the UI part will be done through log4j-cloud.xml file. For that we have to modify following portion in log4j-cloud.xml

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1475) update keystore in SSVM and change download iso/template url after Update SSL Certificate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/ --- (Updated March 4, 2013, 12:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: Base Image Updation facility TestPlan

Thanks for the test plan, I have reviewed the test cases, you may proceed with testing the feature. Since this is moved to 4.2, can you please change the upgrade test cases from 4.1 to 4.2 Thanks Harikrishna On 30-Jan-2013, at 11:03 AM, Kiran Koneti wrote: > Hi, > > Base Image Updation facil

[Discuss] - Building Non-oss build on Master

Hi , I am interested in deploying a set up with load balancer service provider as Netscaler with Xenserver as the hypervisor and hence wanted to deploy a set up out of the non-oss build for Master branch . When I copied the netscaler jars in to the deps folder and tried to build the master bra

Re: About intergrating IDS/IPS to CloudStack

Thanks Sebastien !!! Great idea with setting up one more SystemVM, but I don't know how to do this. Please show me if you don't mind :D 2013/3/4 Sebastien Goasguen > > On Mar 3, 2013, at 4:05 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > > > I'm interesting in integrate IDS/IPS to CloudStack, but didn't find any

Review Request: multiple ip address per nic changes for basic zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9730/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Murali Reddy, and anthony xu.

Re: [1/2] CLOUDSTACK-24: mipn feature for isolated and vpc networks

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi David, > > The test cases for this feature are added in the AddIpToVmNicTest.java file. > In review board after your comments uploaded a new patch (r2) with the test > cases added. > Please let me know If I miss any thing. > Jayapa

Re: About intergrating IDS/IPS to CloudStack

On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > Thanks Sebastien !!! Great idea with setting up one more SystemVM, but I > don't know how to do this. Please show me if you don't mind :D > Mice Xia may be able to comment better than I can: http://www.slideshare.net/mice_xia/integration-3rd-p

[ACS41][ACS42][QA]current blockers - 3/4

Master branch builds can be used with a workaround posted in defect CLOUDSTACK-1468 Some defects need to be opened as new defects as the description matches symptoms but the root cause is different. Requesting QA Team to follow due diligence to close older defects and open new ones in such cas

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Writing this email to get a feel of what community thinks of creating > CloudStack spins. Basically, in my case I have a need for some features that > are in 4.2 master branch but are not available in 4.1 code base. > > > While I wholehearte

issue with 4.1

Hi I am trying to test the latest 4.1 (and 4.1l10n branch). I am on OSX 10.8.2, I had to update to JDK 1.7 to get things going. and after a 'clean install' I get stuck with: Password:WARN [utils.script.Script] (Script-1:) Interrupting script. WARN [utils.script.Script] (Timer-2:) Timed out: su

Re: Summary of why where and how development happens matters

On Mar 1, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:38:27PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> John, I agree we need to merge in logical chunks sooner rather than later >> that allows for reviews and feedback sooner. >> >> Chip I can take the first stab at putting t

Re: About intergrating IDS/IPS to CloudStack

Great!!! That's exactly what I'm looking for. Many thank, Sebastien :-) 2013/3/4 Sebastien Goasguen > > On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > > > Thanks Sebastien !!! Great idea with setting up one more SystemVM, but I > > don't know how to do this. Please show me if you don't mind

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1262: update default built-in systemvm.iso search patch to be consistent with RPM location

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9728/#review17336 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1: commit 99284e7c954b6771dd5101abe5352d4d43a

Re: issue with 4.1

Interesting, after 20 minutes or even more it went through with: WARN [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:) Failed to inject generated public key into systemvm iso injectkeys.sh: Failed to mount original iso /Users/sebastiengoasguen/Documents/incubator-cloudstack/client/target/clou

Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> I stated my opinion on this previously [1], but for the record again: > >> > >> I would suggest that we o

Re: git commit: refs/heads/4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-1469 Commit 2f135be1 introduced jna as a dependency for hypervisor kvm, so make sure the version from the operating system is not used anymore (cherry picke

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:20:16AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Chip, > > Of course! Will stick to the agreed process from now on :-) > > Cheers, > > Hugo Thanks!

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

Vijay, Any updates on this? On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Any update on this? If we want to switch the netscaler plugins over > to the OSS build for 4.1.0, we'd need this to be in place pretty soon > (like next week). > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> I stated my opinion on this previously [1], but

Re: [Discuss] - Building Non-oss build on Master

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 06:07:27PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi , > > I am interested in deploying a set up with load balancer service provider as > Netscaler with Xenserver as the hypervisor and hence wanted to deploy a set > up out of the non-oss build for Master branch . When I copied th

Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for List API Performance Optimization

Inline reply. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Sowmya Krishnan wrote: > Thanks for taking time to review the plan David. Answers inline. > >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:26 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache

Re: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting process and add a term length

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:16:36AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws > [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair. We also want to add > a term for the chair. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/ifwwce657u36yuw

RE: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

There are two jars to be uploaded nitro.jar and sdx_nitro.jar. I started with uploading nitro.jar to sonatype and ultimately to MavenCentral, it is 90% done as of last week and I am stuck at the step Release it (8) https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Sonatype+OSS+Maven+Repository+Usage+

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:06:22PM +0530, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > There are two jars to be uploaded nitro.jar and sdx_nitro.jar. > I started with uploading nitro.jar to sonatype and ultimately to > MavenCentral, > it is 90% done as of last week and I am stuck at the step Release it (8) > >

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > There are two jars to be uploaded nitro.jar and sdx_nitro.jar. > I started with uploading nitro.jar to sonatype and ultimately to MavenCentral, > it is 90% done as of last week and I am stuck at the step Release it (8) > > https://docs.

RE: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

If there is no reply I will send out a separate mail. Source for nitro.jar: https://github.com/netscaler/nitro PS: Yet to upload for nitro_sdx.jar -Vijay -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@inc

Re: issue with 4.1

There's a bug for this, I think it's related to passwordless sudo for cloud user on management server. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi I am trying to test the latest 4.1 (and 4.1l10n branch). > > I am on OSX 10.8.2, I had to update to JDK 1.7 to get things going. >

Re: [ACS41][ACS42][QA]current blockers - 3/4

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:48:33AM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > > Master branch builds can be used with a workaround posted in defect > CLOUDSTACK-1468 > Some defects need to be opened as new defects as the description matches > symptoms but the root cause is different. Requesting QA Team t

Re: issue with 4.1

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:03AM -0700, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > There's a bug for this, I think it's related to passwordless sudo for > cloud user on management server. Is this the one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1389 > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Sebastien Goasgu

RE: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

-Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:04 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien

Re: Summary of why where and how development happens matters

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:16:36AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:38:27PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> John, I agree we need to merge in logical chunks sooner rather than later > >> that allows for

Re: issue with 4.1

Chip, I opened CLOUDSTACK-1389 for the exact issue described by Sebastien. As noted in the ticket, I believe the behavior implemented by the script represents a security vulnerability(with or without the use of sudo). Thanks, -John On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mo

Re: issue with 4.1

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:08:32AM -0500, John Burwell wrote: > Chip, > > I opened CLOUDSTACK-1389 for the exact issue described by Sebastien. As > noted in the ticket, I believe the behavior implemented by the script > represents a security vulnerability(with or without the use of sudo). Have a

Re: issue with 4.1

Chip, My recommendation in the ticket is to extract the script from the management server to a external script provided as a connivence to end users. If we encounter a situation where a certificate is not present, provide a meaningful error message in the logs and exit. If a user needs help g

Re: issue with 4.1

Chip, I neglected to mention in my reply that the extracted utility script would also need to be refactored to accept the various important bits (e.g. password, type, and length) into command line parameters or prompt the user. The core of the security issue I see is the defaulting of the pass

RE: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

> -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:05 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Mond

RE: issue with 4.1

+1 to John's comment, Regards ilya > -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:16 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: issue with 4.1 > > Chip, > > I neglected to mention in my reply that the extracted ut

Re: Review Request: Document add/remove network on a VM features

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/#review17338 --- docs/en-US/add-remove-nic.xml

Re: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting process and add a term length

+1 (to the text, and overall - thanks!) On 05/03/2013, at 2:33 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:16:36AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws >> [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair.

RE: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:50 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Musayev, Ilya > Subject: Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Musayev, Ilya > wrote: > > Writing this e

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:36:43PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:50 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Musayev, Ilya > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013, at 09:03 AM, David Nalley wrote: > So software typically has several stages: > > Does end of support mean both of these things simultaneously. > No more bugfixes > No more security fixes > > So wearing your enterprise software consumer hat - does a support > lifetime of appro

Master branch build is broken again

Hi there, I could not compile master after pulling latest code today, build failed with the following error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-engine-orchestration: Compilation failure [ERROR] /Users

RE: Master branch build is broken again

Min, You should just revert the commit. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 9:51 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Nitin Mehta > Subject: Master branch build is broken again > Importance: High > > Hi th

RE: How do we allow ACL on Layer 4 Protocols in CloudStack

May I know where can I find the Functional Specification for this feature to understand how this feature works, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:30 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: K

Re: Master branch build is broken again

My bad. I will revert the commit... On 04/03/13 11:25 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >Min, > >You should just revert the commit. > >--Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 9:51 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

May I know how can I use this feature in CloudStack. I mean, What do I need to do on CloudStack to specify multiple ACL deny rules? Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:35 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incuba

RE: Master branch build is broken again

-1 on this checkin And this is not a small change. 18 files. Some large completely new methods checked in. Changes to the virtual machine state machine. No unit testing. I would reject this fix on these problems alone. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch networking plugin update

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9671/#review17342 --- Kanzhe, this is too late for 4.1 Please re-submit against master Also

Re: Master branch build is broken again

Even with Nitin's revert, master still failed with the following error: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "" at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:4 8) at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:470

Re: Master branch build is broken again

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:00:24AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: > -1 on this checkin > > And this is not a small change. 18 files. Some large completely new methods > checked in. Changes to the virtual machine state machine. No unit testing. > > > I would reject this fix on these problems al

Please Review Weekly News Draft!

Hi all, Draft of the weekly news for 4 March 2013 is up. I would appreciate additional eyeballs to review this week's issue and any additional content: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Apache+CloudStack+Weekly+News+-+4+March+2013 Will be posting after 5 p.m. my time (Centra

RE: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

Thanks for the tip David on the signatures upload! I was a able to successfully release the NetScaler's Nitro jar file. Once I complete the release of NetScaler SDX's jar file as well, the stage will be set to make the NetScaler's Adapter part of OSS. Will summarize and send a separate mail on

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > Thanks for the tip David on the signatures upload! > > I was a able to successfully release the NetScaler's Nitro jar file. > > Once I complete the release of NetScaler SDX's jar file as well, the stage > will be set to make the NetScal

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

> On March 2, 2013, 1:10 a.m., edison su wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java, > > line 802 > > > > > > Wondering, what's the purpose of network.bridge.

Re: [ACS41][QA] Supported Vs Test Compatibility Matrix Review

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:59:05PM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Community, > > I have posted Supported Vs Test compatibility Matrix here [1]. Can you pl > review and provide input on any new versions that we need to include > Also some of you might be testing additional versions, If required

RE: [ACS41][QA] Supported Vs Test Compatibility Matrix Review

Yeah we did have one for 4.0 as well. I will post it. We created while testing upgrades -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:21 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Supported Vs Test Compa

No password at start of new password enabled VM

There is no return of random set password at start of password enabled virtual machine, so user can not login. VM must be stopped and password restarted again in order to get actual password. This part of code is in charge of it..seems not to working well, indeed there is no args.password val

Re: [ACS41][QA] Supported Vs Test Compatibility Matrix Review

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013, at 01:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I didn't see a reply from Jessica / Radhika, so I opened a docs > component improvement to get it documented. I picked that one up. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

RE: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 12:13 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk > > For those who don't know (this probably doesn't matter, but...), when KVM > br

Re: Master branch build is broken again

Filed blocker for this build issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1502. Hope that somebody can pick it up and fix immediately. Merge is blocked again:( Thanks -min On 3/4/13 10:27 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Even with Nitin's revert, master still failed with the following error: >

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/#review17353 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On March 1, 2013, 7:46 a.m., D

Networking Question

Hi, I have not had the opportunity to make use of the Advanced Networking features in CloudStack. Can someone fill me in or point me to relevant docs regarding how we isolate VMs from one another? For example, in a Basic Networking CS environment, is each VM run on its own VLAN? Assuming that's

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

> On March 4, 2013, 7:53 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! commit in master: ff099fa651e8476220332d7e1cc4b24746802cfe Dave, can you update the documentation in docs for the bits you changed? - Hugo --- This is an automatically g

Re: Networking Question

Hi Mike, you can drop me an email directly if you want to talk about advanced networking features. The simple answer is that each isolated(default)NAT network created grabs a VLAN from the guest VLAN pool. You can have many VM under a domain sharing an isolated network. Sent from my iPhone On

f5 jar dependency error?

I'm running into an error " Failure to find com.cloud.com.f5:icontrol:jar:1.0 in http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2"; when running mvn -e -P systemvm -Dnonoss clean install. The error stack is pasted below: [INFO] [INFO]

storage_refactor merged into master?

Hi, I would just like to confirm that the storage_refactor branch has been merged into master. I've been off on other CloudStack-related business for a while and haven't been working on code for a 4.2 storage plug-in that I'm developing in that time. I was under the impression that the storage_r

RE: issue with 4.1

+1. It does not belong to the management server. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 8:13 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: issue with 4.1 > > Chip, > > My recommendation in the ticket is t

Re: Review Request: Documentation for the new features: Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone, Enable L4-L7 network services in the shared network in the advanced zone, and User-provid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/#review17361 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati On Jan. 1

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1449: Fix a typo to return account-specfic user.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9736/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- In UserAcc

Re: storage_refactor merged into master?

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I would just like to confirm that the storage_refactor branch has been > merged into master. > > I've been off on other CloudStack-related business for a while and haven't > been working on code for a 4.2 storage plug-in th

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1449: Fix a typo to return account-specfic user.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9736/#review17365 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.1: commit 02bbb10826a22cb3f1bcebfdc1c98b174

Re: issue with 4.1

+1 (again) On 3/4/13 1:06 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >+1. It does not belong to the management server. > >--Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 8:13 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: issue

Re: issue with 4.1

Anyone want to take a shot at fixing this then? We seem to agree on the right general direction. On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:11:22PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > +1 (again) > > On 3/4/13 1:06 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: > > >+1. It does not belong to the management server. > > > >--Alex > > >

Re: storage_refactor merged into master?

Hi, I guess I didn't say that quite right. :) Edison had some stub SolidFire code in the repo before I even started in on CloudStack three months ago. It's that code that I'm referring to. Thanks! On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:25:32PM -0700

Re: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting process and add a term length

+1 On 1 March 2013 16:16, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws > [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair. We also want to add > a term for the chair. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/ifwwce657u36yuwz > [2] > https

Re: storage_refactor merged into master?

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:17:16PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I guess I didn't say that quite right. :) > > Edison had some stub SolidFire code in the repo before I even started in on > CloudStack three months ago. It's that code that I'm referring to. > > Thanks! These? # ls plu

Re: storage_refactor merged into master?

I didn't see a POM file or any source files. Perhaps my master is not up to date the way I thought it was. I was afraid to update master since it sounds like we are having build problems. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:17:16PM -0700, Mike Tutk

RE: issue with 4.1

I even think db upgrade should be separated from mgt server. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:11 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: issue with 4.1 > > +1 (again) > > On 3/4/13 1:06

Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk

I think this just requires an updated system vm (the virtio-serial portion). I've played a bit with the old debian 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem one and can't get the device nodes to show up, even though the /boot/config shows that it has CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y. However, if I try this with a CentOS 6.3 VM,

Re: Updated our status file for the IPMC

Looks good Chip. On 1 March 2013 18:30, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to point out that I've updated our status file for the IPMC > [1] to include some missing (new) committers and PPMC members. I also > added all of our IPMC/Board report submissions that were missing. Last >

  1   2   >