Hello,
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Scanning.html#clamd reads "Once you
have set up your configuration to your liking, and understand how you will be
sending commands to the daemon, running clamd itself is simple. Simply execute
the command:
clamd"
But after installation I also get
"/
an to target
multiple files or directories with multiple scan commands.
If you're running a single scan once, even if selecting multiple files or
directories, then clamscan may be easier:
E.g. run:
clamscan -r DIRECTORY1 DIRECTORY2 DIRECTORY3
From: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.cla
sing clamd@ service vs launching clamd from
command line
On 10.06.24 05:57, neel roy via clamav-users wrote:
>There might be possibility that we will use more services from clamd in the
future. So we want to use clamd + clamdscan instead of clamscan.
>
>In which case I wanted to know the di
om: Matus UHLAR - fantomas via clamav-users
<clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
Sent: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:28:28
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Cc: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Using clamd@ service vs launching clamd from
command line
On 10.06.24
I am using EPEL version and I don't think I have a choice. But it _might_
be worth looking at difference.
Thanks in advance,
-Neel.
From: Andrew C Aitchison <and...@aitchison.me.uk>
Sent: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:42:49
To: neel roy via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Hello,
Does clamav scan memory mapped files? If yes, does it option to scan _just_
memory mapped files?
Thanks in advance,
-Neel.___
Manage your clamav-users mailing list subscription / unsubscribe:
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-use
Hello Ralf,
I hope I can ask follow up question. You wrote:
> I doesn't (from the clamonacc man page):
> The clamonacc daemon registers f
Hello Ralf,
Thanks. I hope I can ask follow up questions. You wrote:
> I doesn't (from the clamonacc man page):
> The clamonacc daemon registers for file access notifications from the
> Linux kernel and in response, submits scans to the clamd scanning
> daemon for a verdict. On-Access requires a
Hello,
I need to scan Linux systems for viruses/malwares, just entire filesystem.
There are few options to consider.
- One is normally what users do: Use clamav to scan system
once a day.
- The second option is to find files modified in last one
day and give that list to anti virus pro
almost no change. With lots of
change, this will change.
**However** my question is this: whenever anti virus does scan, in this case,
clamav, they do NOT find changed files, even (on linux) very efficient utility
such as "find" exists. There must be a reason. What that reason could
for scan
Hello,
In the Message;
Subject : [clamav-users] Using linux command
"find" to get modified files list for scan
Message-ID
: <1733715472.s.23081.autosave.drafts.1733715610.1...@webmail.rediffmail.com>
Date & Time: 9 Dec 2024 03:40:10 -
[RN] == neel roy via clama
Hello Masaru,
> clamscan and clamdscan can be used in combination with the find
> command. For example, you can use the find command to identify
> recently modified files, and then pipe the output to clamscan or
> clamdscan to scan only the modified files. This method can greatly
> reduce the scan
Hello Masaru,
There is some good information in your message but I believe my question is
different.
I am not concerned about ClamAV not detecting changes. I want to know why
should I not use "find" to detect changed files. The part below from
your mail\reply does provide relevant information
Hello Masaru,
I think I am not being able to explain my question. Here is one more try in
perhaps little strange approach:
When I run clamscan/clamdscan on entire file system, why doesn't it use
"find" command to get the list of modified files since last time and
run scan on them? In which cas
..@aitchison.me.uk>
Date & Time: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:47:59 + (GMT)
[ACA] == Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
<clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> has written:
ACA> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, neel roy via clamav-users wrote:
ACA> > Yes, that I found evident as described in ma
Hello Masaru,
> Have you tried using CGroup to limit resources or changing the clamd
> configuration file (adding MemoryLimit=768M, CPUQuota=30% lines)?
Apologies for late reply. Had to 6 months old conversations to get info needed.
What you suggest, CPUQuota, is available for services, is it no
Hello,
While doing scan with clamscan or clamdscan, what does duration, cpu and memory
requirement depends on? Does it depend on number of files or size of file?
Thanks in advance,
-Neel.___
Manage your clamav-users mailing list subscription / unsubsc
e two questions:
does clamav scan memory mapped files? If it does, is there a way to
ask clamav to scan just memory mapped files?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks!
From: neel roy via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
Sent: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 12:24:27
To: <clamav-users@lists.clamav.n
et.
For now, I think we can only ignore the error messages.
Thank you for your understanding.
$B:9=P?M(B: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net> $B$,(B
neel roy via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> $B$NBeM}$GAw?.(B
$BAw?.F|;~(B: 2024$BG/(B12$B7n(
line, create a scan report,
and exit."
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Scanning.html#clamscan
On Dec 6, 2024, 10:08 PM -0500, neel roy via clamav-users
<clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>, wrote:
Hello,
I passed 10,000 files listed in the file to clamscan and clamdscan. I see very
big
Hello,
I passed 10,000 files listed in the file to clamscan and clamdscan. I see very
big difference on 4 cpu bare metal machine. Why is it?
I am using clamav 1.0.7.
clamscan -f large_files.txt - 3 mins 5 seconds
clamdscan --fdpass -f large_files.txt - 9 seconds
Notes
- For clamdscan, I am *not
and exit."
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Scanning.html#clamscan
On Dec 6, 2024, 10:08 PM -0500, neel roy via clamav-users
<clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>, wrote:
Hello,
I passed 10,000 files listed in the file to clamscan and clamdscan. I see very
big difference on 4 cpu
22 matches
Mail list logo
