Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

instead of NFS. At the moment bacula-dir & bacula-sd run on a single host. The disk space from the filer is used through NFS mounts on the bacula host. Yateen *From:*Josh Fisher *Sent:* Monday, October 4, 2021 8:27 PM *To:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-u

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

ober 4, 2021 8:27 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage On 10/2/21 2:52 AM, Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote: Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk spac

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

On 10/2/21 2:52 AM, Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote: Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk space is available to Bacula storage daemon as an NFS mount from a remote ZFS based filer that has RAID configured disks. Recently one o

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon stopped with NFS mounted storage

Hi All, We are using Bacula 9.4.4 with PostGreSQL for disk based backeup. Disk space is available to Bacula storage daemon as an NFS mount from a remote ZFS based filer that has RAID configured disks. Recently one of the disk in the RAID array failed, degrading the remote ZFS pool. Later we ob

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: Why not try the Debian packages? bacula-9.4.2 is available via stretch-backports. Thank you Sven. This way seems more reliable to me. Best regards. ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sour

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 20:26 tarihinde Greg Woods yazdı: I had the same symptom on a Fedora system. It turned out that the storage daemon was being started before the network interface was fully up. This is common with systemd-based systems when something is either compiled from source, or installed from a

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:32 AM Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > If I stop the system service and start it manually from command line > with "bacula-sd -d 200 -c /opt/bacula/etc/bacula-sd.conf" command then I > can get status of storage daemon and

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Hello Sven, bacula-* systemd unit scripts sometimes fail to start on machine boot depending on the time required to mount _netdev disks (confirm it with service bacula-sd status after boot). Perhaps, adding this option would make it more resilient: After=network.target mnt-wibble.mount I opene

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Just in time: I just read you still uses init.d scripts. Refer to: https://askubuntu.com/questions/90982/how-to-make-a-script-in-init-d-run-later https://serverfault.com/questions/550382/how-to-detect-if-mount-point-exists-from-init-d-script Regards, Sent from TypeApp On Feb 22, 2019, at 7:44 AM,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On 22.02.19 10:06, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote: > 22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: >> Why not try the Debian packages? bacula-9.4.2 is available via >> stretch-backports. > > I thought packages in the script are official Debian packages too. I > never used backports but wil

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı: Unfortunately, your systems uses the legacy SysVinit-scripts to start the SD. That way you don't get a whole lot of debugging output in the journal. Did you compile the SD yourself? Maybe you forgot to add "--with-systemd=/lib/systemd/system" to ena

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

On 21.02.19 19:31, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote: > # service bacula-sd status > ● bacula-sd.service - LSB: Start Bacula Storage daemon at boot time >    Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd; generated; vendor preset: > enabled) >    Active: active (exited) since Thu 2019-02-21 10:17:45 +

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Service not working at start-up (after os update)

Hello List, At the beginning everything was OK. I updated the system two days ago. Packages below updated. postfix:amd64 (3.1.8-0+deb9u1, 3.1.9-0+deb9u2), gnupg-agent:amd64 (2.1.18-8~deb9u3, 2.1.18-8~deb9u4), libxapian30:amd64 (1.4.3-2+deb9u2, 1.4.3-2+deb9u3), libsystemd0:amd64 (232-25+deb9u

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

Am 2017-08-30 17:33, schrieb Sven Hartge: On 30.08.2017 15:19, christian.garl...@cg-networks.de wrote: We never had such a problem before the upgrade, so we are wondering what could be the reason for that. Could you please add deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug/ stretch-debug main cont

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

On 30.08.2017 15:19, christian.garl...@cg-networks.de wrote: > We never had such a problem before the upgrade, so we are wondering what > could be the reason for that. Could you please add deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug/ stretch-debug main contrib non-free to your source.list and insta

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crashes on Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6

Hi all, recently we updated our backup server from Debian 8 to Debian 9 with Bacula release 7.4.4+dfsg-6. After a few days we experienced some crashes of the Storage Daemon during the backup runs. When Bacula is idle no crash happens. The log showed this: Aug 26 06:03:15 s110180 bacula-sd[9

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Thanks. > Wanderlei Huttel kirjoitti 10.6.2017 kello 19.03: > > Hello Jari > > You only can use SD and DIR and FD in the same version or SD and DIR in the > same version and FD in prior version. > > > Best Regards > > Wanderlei Hüttel > http://www.huttel.com.br >

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Hello Jari You only can use SD and DIR and FD in the same version or SD and DIR in the same version and FD in prior version. Best Regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* http://www.huttel.com.br 2017-06-10 12:23 GMT-03:00 Jari Fredriksson : > > Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a need for such,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

On 06/10/2017 09:23 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a need for such, as I do not wish to compile. Hi Jari, The SD(s) must always be the same (exact) version as the DIR. The FD(s) can be lower versions with the only side-effect being that they will o

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon older that dir & some ad's - possible?

Can I use SD 5.x with 7.x components? I have a need for such, as I do not wish to compile. Jari Fredriksson Bitwell Oy +358 400 779 440 ja...@bitwell.fi Dev: https://www.bitwell.fi Ops: https://www.bitwell.biz --

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hello Josh, I run tests with different bacula versions: using 5.2.6, it seems bacula do not recognize the "ip" directive and it was necessary to use the "ipv6" directive instead. Versions 7.0.5 and 7.2.0 worked fine with "ip = { addr = :: }" and "ip = { addr = ::0 }". Best regards, Ana On Thu,

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 4:29 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > It says "Config error: Can't add hostname(::/0) and port(9103) to addrlist". My bad. That should be (::0), not (::/0). Most IPv6 address can be written multiple ways. Writing it as (::0), adding the numeric '0', might allow Bacula to see it as an IPv

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 5:06 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > Hi Ana, > > My bacula installation is version 5.2.13. > > Matthew I believe that Ana's example, using the 'ipv6' keyword rather than the 'ip' keyword, will work. Nevertheless, it SHOULD have worked with the 'ip' keyword. The 'ip' keyword is supposed

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hi Ana, My bacula installation is version 5.2.13. Matthew On 09/09/2015 02:04 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > Hello Matthew, > > Which version are you using? :: worked for me in 7.2.0. > > Director { > Name = x-dir > DirAddresses = { > ipv6 = { addr=::; port=9101 } > } > > xx

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hello Matthew, Which version are you using? :: worked for me in 7.2.0. Director { Name = x-dir DirAddresses = { ipv6 = { addr=::; port=9101 } } x-dir: bnet_server.c:87-0 Addresses [::]:9101 tcp0 0 :::9101 :::*LISTEN Best rega

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

It says "Config error: Can't add hostname(::/0) and port(9103) to addrlist". Matthew On 09/09/2015 12:55 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: > > On 9/9/2015 2:54 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed >> this[1] guide without success. I'v

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

On 9/9/2015 2:54 PM, Matthew Voss wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed > this[1] guide without success. I've also attempted to use the > SDAddresses directive like this: > > SDAddresses = { > ip = { > addr = :: > port =

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon listen on IPv6

Hi All, I'm trying to make the Storage Daemon visible via IPv6. I've followed this[1] guide without success. I've also attempted to use the SDAddresses directive like this: SDAddresses = { ip = { addr = :: port = 9103 } } The storage daemon seemed to go silent when I used

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didnt accept Device

Hi, I have the same problem with some of my defined jobs. Sometimes it fails, sometimes not. I run the failed jobs "by hand" and it works OK. Here's the log: 02-jul 01:22 bacula.intranet.visualtis.com JobId 914: Fatal error: Storage daemon didn't accept Device "BackupsWeekly-OVH" command. 02

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon on multiple networks

On 4/2/14, 1:43 PM, Ivan Savcic wrote: > Pool { > Name = FileViaMainLink > Storage = FileOtherSD > } > > Pool { > Name = FileViaOtherLink > Storage = FileMainSD > } Sorry, I have permuted the Storages here. Should read: Pool { Name = FileViaMainLink Storage = File

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon on multiple networks

Hi list, First off, a disclaimer: I'm not a Bacula expert, far from that. :) Novice mistakes possibly loom ahead. Now, the problem: we have the need for our Bacula SD to be on two different networks, with the intention of backups going over different links. I've searched for similar question

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

On 16.01.2013 18:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 > Director on the server? > > major.minor.release Hi. Officially, don't try t

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

On 2013-01-16 11:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always > be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version > 5.2.12 > Director on the server? I accidentally ran something similar to that r

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on the same minor release number" So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 Director on the server? major.minor.release --

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "storage-tape" command

Bonjour, cette liste étant en langue Anglaise, je vais répondre en Anglais, esperant que vous comprendrez. Am 12.12.2011 18:44, schrieb zoubeir elguesmi: > mais lorsque le job de backup se declanche il m'affiche le message d'erreur > suivant : > > srvtest1-dir JobId 21: Fatal error: > Stor

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "storage-tape" command

Bonjour, j'ai installer bacula 5 sur ubuntu server 8 tout fonctionne normalement ,je connecte au console je fait le status su storge me donne : *srvtest1-sd Version: 5.0.2 (28 April 2010) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu ubuntu 8.04 Daemon started 12-déc011 18:46, 0 Jobs run since started. Heap: heap

[Bacula-users] storage daemon does not releases resources

Hello everybody from some time I have an annoying problem: - from time to time firewall drops connection for some hosts during backup process, as a consequence backup jobs failed. this is normal. - but storage daemon believes that such jobs are stiil active. when amount of such failed jobs is g

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash

Thanks Martin. Unfortunately I don't have a way to reproduce the crash. All I can say at this point is that it happens once every 2 to 5 weeks and for no reason to me. I'll keep an eye on it and hopefully in a few months I'll be able to recognize a pattern that will help me take advantage of th

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash

I suggest following the "Manually Running Bacula Under The Debugger" instructions at http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/problems/problems/What_Do_When_Bacula.html#SECTION0064 because the automatic traceback didn't give anything useful. __Martin --

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash

Hello, I'm using Bacula-5.0.2 on CentOS-5.5 x86_64. Every month or so the storage daemon crashes and I need help to debug this problem. It crashed again this morning. What happened is that yesterday I setup a new backup job. The job was upgraded from Incremental to Full because it was the fir

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash backtrace

> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:42:25 -0600, Robert LeBlanc said: > > My SD has been crashing every night and I finally got a backtrace. I don't > know what all this means, but I could sure use some help to figure out why > it keeps crashing and how to stop it so that I can get some back-ups done. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash backtrace

On 06/23/2010 10:42 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > My SD has been crashing every night and I finally got a backtrace. I > don't know what all this means, but I could sure use some help to figure > out why it keeps crashing and how to stop it so that I can get some > back-ups done. The best thing to d

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon crash backtrace

My SD has been crashing every night and I finally got a backtrace. I don't know what all this means, but I could sure use some help to figure out why it keeps crashing and how to stop it so that I can get some back-ups done. Thanks, Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device

I've the problem, that sometimes a virtualfull fails with the following message. I've about 20 similar jobdefinitions and sometimes they work, and sometimes they fail. Is it possible to get a logfile or something to debug why the storagedaemon didn't accept the command at this time? if i run the j

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Issues

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:08 PM, ElCid32 wrote: > > Greetings Gurus: > > I installed Bacula 5.0.1 on Ubuntu Server 10.0.4.  I've configured everything > to spec.  Btape recognizes, reads and writes the tape drive attached to > /dev/nst0.  When I run BAT to try getting a status on the storage devi

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Issues

Greetings Gurus: I installed Bacula 5.0.1 on Ubuntu Server 10.0.4. I've configured everything to spec. Btape recognizes, reads and writes the tape drive attached to /dev/nst0. When I run BAT to try getting a status on the storage device I get an error "Failed to connect to storage deamon...

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Maximum Concurrent Jobs

Hi, I have 25 full jobs that run over the weekend, but I want to only allow 10 to run at any one time. Initially I gave the jobs priorities, but this didn't work as some jobs take almost the entire weekend to finish to the lower priority jobs were not starting until Monday morning. So what I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

If you need to ramp up to hundreds of machines, let me know - it is easy and simple. Yudhvir === On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:02 PM, tim5 wrote: > > Thanks John. You were right. I was not restarting the storage daemon . . > Doh! My sincerest thanks, Tim. > >

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

Thanks John. You were right. I was not restarting the storage daemon . . Doh! My sincerest thanks, Tim. +-- |This was sent by tim55...@shaw.ca via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, tim5 wrote: > > Thanks for the reply John, but I reloaded from console as well as stop/start > the app . . . > I do not believe either of those restart the storage. John -- Enter the

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

Thanks for the reply John, but I reloaded from console as well as stop/start the app . . . +-- |This was sent by tim55...@shaw.ca via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:39 PM, tim5 wrote: > > I'm sure I'll feel like an idiot when someone points out the obvious, but my > frustration runeth over . . . > I've had Bacula (3.0.1) running fine with the default configuration on my > Ubuntu Jaunty home file server. I wanted to add a second

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Config?

I'm sure I'll feel like an idiot when someone points out the obvious, but my frustration runeth over . . . I've had Bacula (3.0.1) running fine with the default configuration on my Ubuntu Jaunty home file server. I wanted to add a second client, so I took this opportunity to rework the config f

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "VersBande" command.

once again! > Message du 03/06/09 09:43 > De : "Bruno Friedmann" > A : > Copie à : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device"VersBande" > command. > > Hi Jc. Just to be clear. Have you a

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "VersBande" command.

000à9\r\035¶\177\000\000\2009h\000\000\000\000\000"... > #2 0x004051c3 in main (argc=0, argv=0x7fff25ecd748) at stored.c:265 > 265 &dird_workq, handle_connection_request); > ch = -1 > no_signals = false > test_config = false > thid = 1094293

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "VersBande" command.

00 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Can someone help me please? Best Regards to all! > Message du 28/05/09 12:26 > De : "jc.dus...@laposte.net" > A : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Copie à : > Objet : [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn'

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "VersBande" command.

Dear all bacula users, I get a problem on a x86_64 debian lenny with bacula SD (Version: 2.4.4 (28 December 2008)) installed by apt-get and an IBM LTO4 Ultrium4-H storage device. I can't make backup trough my LTO but backup to a file works fine. When I try to launch a backup on it I got the f

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Directives

Juche List, for those interested, I found a place where to read more about >> LabelMedia = yes http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Basic_Volume_Management.html "LabelMedia = yes" can only be used, if the pool Resource in the Director Configuration used for that Device has the "LabelFormat"

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Directives

Hi, please reply to the list so others can see what we're discussing. Also, I prefer to reply to mail sent to me privately if we have a consulting contract :-) 15.04.2009 09:05, Hannes Gruber wrote: > Juche Again! > >> (as we're in dialect here :-) > Yes we are! > >> Someone correct me if I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Directives

Moin, 14.04.2009 22:09, Hannes Gruber wrote: > Juche List, (as we're in dialect here :-) > > I am just going through the documentation of Bacula. > In the Documentation for the Device Resource of the Storage Daemon > Configuration: > > http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/install/install/Storage_D

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Directives

Juche List, I am just going through the documentation of Bacula. In the Documentation for the Device Resource of the Storage Daemon Configuration: http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/install/install/Storage_Daemon_Configuratio.html#DeviceResource The two Directives: LabelMedia = yes Automa

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

script to let bacula reads from the fifofiles and no wait for the script? I'v read that this can be accomplish using 'exec>/dev/null' so I use it in my script, but I think this is not enough Thanks ISABEL -----Mensaje original- De: Arno Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Env

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

.e. for the reader to attach to the FIFO e) dump the database f) close / destroy the database (I'm not sure if b should not happen after c, so it can send error messages to the FD.) Ok... http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=application_specific_backups:postgresql has a bit more sophistic

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

> Thank you > ISABEL > > > -Mensaje original- > De: Arno Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 31 de octubre de 2008 11:04 > Para: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device > &qu

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

ISABEL -Mensaje original- De: Isabel Bermejo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 31 de octubre de 2008 11:35 Para: Arno Lehmann; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage" Hi Yes, the script

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

ts I've read Thank you ISABEL -Mensaje original- De: Arno Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: viernes, 31 de octubre de 2008 11:04 Para: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage" Hi, 31

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

Hi, 31.10.2008 10:27, Isabel Bermejo wrote: > Hi > I'm trying to backup MySQL database using bacula and a FifoStorage. First I > configure a script named "backwithfifo" which dumps the database. > > #!/bin/sh > # > exec > /dev/null > SCRIPTDIR=/usr/bin > mkfifo /tmp/tmpfifo > cd $SCRIPTDIR > ./my

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

Hi I'm trying to backup MySQL database using bacula and a FifoStorage. First I configure a script named "backwithfifo" which dumps the database. #!/bin/sh # exec > /dev/null SCRIPTDIR=/usr/bin mkfifo /tmp/tmpfifo cd $SCRIPTDIR ./mysqldump -h localhost -u root -pclipper iesa > /tmp/tmpfifo res=$? i

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon Encryption

On Jan 8, 2008, at 23:26, Dan Langille wrote: [snip] Then I thought, if you want to do that, why not just encrypt at the SD instead of the FD. If you're a big company and you want to encrypt, why not do it all in one place? Why bother distributing the same key everywhere? Or multiple k

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon console error messages "NULL Volume name. This shouldn't happen!!!"

On May 21, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Kelly, Brian wrote: > I am curently backing up ~400 Windows clients every night. I have 4 > (soon to > be five) 800 GB arrays to which the volumes are being written. > Everything is > running quite well with one exception. Two of the four storage servers > display

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon console error messages "NULL Volume name. This shouldn't happen!!!"

I am curently backing up ~400 Windows clients every night. I have 4 (soon to be five) 800 GB arrays to which the volumes are being written. Everything is running quite well with one exception. Two of the four storage servers display the following message five or six times a night: drss03a: append.

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon only

One of my client machines actually has the tape device attached to it and I want to use it without having to uninstall or move my director to it. My understanding is that I need to install the storage daemon on it since it's just got the client installed on it now. I'm not sure how to do this wit

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "dds3" command

It doesn't work because the "Name" is only used as reference to the storage device in the job. In this case I have the following job: Job { Name = "Palma" Type = Backup Client = palma-fd FileSet = "barraldcs" Schedule = "WeeklyCycle" Storage = pequena

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "dds3" command

On Tue, March 27, 2007 4:34 pm, Daniel Moros wrote: > bacula-dir.conf > [...] > Storage { > Name = pequena I think the Name above should be dds3, not pequena -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "dds3" command

Hello I am a new user of bacula. I have been using Version: 1.36.3-2ubuntu2 (on ubuntu) and everything was just fine but now I installed and started using Version: 1.38.11-8 (on Debian), I've been constantly presented this error, and I don't know what it means. 27-Mar 16:43 mdaniel-dir: Start

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

On Tuesday 20 March 2007 13:42, Jorj Bauer wrote: > > Can you explain what you mean by "one of the lite mechanisms"? > > SQLite or SQLite3. OK, I understand. > I don't believe they have any remote access directly. No, they are compiled in (or can run as a shared library). > > > I see no nee

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

> Can you explain what you mean by "one of the lite mechanisms"? SQLite or SQLite3. I don't believe they have any remote access directly. > I see no need to have each Storage daemon have its own database. The only reason I mention it is because of the non-remote-access database methods. -- Jorj

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

On Tuesday 20 March 2007 12:51, Jorj Bauer wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, what -- down the line -- would the -sd require a > > > database for? Config info? > > > > Config info in the database -- never. Only people who have never done a bare > > metal recovery would think of such an implementati

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

> > Out of curiosity, what -- down the line -- would the -sd require a > > database for? Config info? > > Config info in the database -- never. Only people who have never done a bare > metal recovery would think of such an implementation :-). > > bscan built into the SD. However, I *might* do

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:41, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > The SD does not "currently" need/use the DB (this will probably chang). > > However, some of the other tools that are built with the SD do need the DB, > > therefore the dependence. If you want ONLY the SD, for the

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

Hi, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kern Sibbald wrote: >> The SD does not "currently" need/use the DB (this will probably chang). >> However, some of the other tools that are built with the SD do need the DB, >> therefore the dependence. If you w

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kern Sibbald wrote: > The SD does not "currently" need/use the DB (this will probably chang). > However, some of the other tools that are built with the SD do need the DB, > therefore the dependence. If you want ONLY the SD, for the current time, y

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

On Friday 16 March 2007 15:19, Richard Adams wrote: > I know this is likely a dumb question, but it was my understanding > that the storage daemon was independent of the SQL database, but I > have been unable to figure out a way to build additional storage > daemons on other machines without

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

I know this is likely a dumb question, but it was my understanding that the storage daemon was independent of the SQL database, but I have been unable to figure out a way to build additional storage daemons on other machines without including a build of mySQL or SQLite. Is there something

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

Hi, On 2/6/2007 5:20 PM, Dragos Gheorghe wrote: ...snip > mount command > > 22: bacula-storage-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01 > Select Storage resource (1-22): 22 > 3905 Device "bacula-device-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01" (/dev/nst0) open > but no Bacula volume is mounted. > If this is not a bla

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

im not using an autochanger (yet), its a simple lto2 single tape drive # cat /usr/local/bacula/storage/etc/devices/bacula-sd-device-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01.conf |grep -v ^#|egrep ".+" Device { Name = bacula-device-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01 DeviceType= Tape MediaType =

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

I'm speculating that your jobs are referencing the tape drive as opposed to the autochanger in their specified storage resource. Could you post the lines of your SD where your drive and autochanger are configured, and could you also post the job line for your job thats not running. Also try thi

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

not really because a du -h is about 2MB so maybe tell me what your hunch is or what specific configuration you want to see? im using a split config, many files targeted at specific parts of the configuration (via the Include directive), also i havent changed _anything_ in the config layout fro

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

Could you post your sd and dir configs? I think I know what the problem is. Dragos Gheorghe wrote: > > not really > > *add pool=bacula-pool-tape-incremental > storage=bacula-storage-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01 > You probably don't want to be using this command since it > creates database records

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

not really *add pool=bacula-pool-tape-incremental storage=bacula-storage-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01 You probably don't want to be using this command since it creates database records without labeling the Volumes. You probably want to use the "label" command. Enter number of Volumes to create. 0=

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

Basically it sounds like that tape didn't get assigned to a pool. Try this in bconsole- add pool=/pool name/ storage=bacula-device-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01 then when prompted enter the volume name of the tape which I think is B0 Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem at hand. I'm still not

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

*list pool Automatically selected Catalog: bacula-catalog Using Catalog "bacula-catalog" ++---+-+-+--++ | PoolId | Name | NumVols | MaxVols | PoolType | LabelFormat

Re: [Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

What does a list pool show? Dragos Gheorghe wrote: > my setup worked ok both on scheduled jobs and bconsole run command, > until today and for a couple of months now (on bacula 2 from 2 weeks) > im working on Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) i686-pc-linux-gnu redhat > compiled from source on cent

[Bacula-users] storage daemon doesnt read label on labeled tape

my setup worked ok both on scheduled jobs and bconsole run command, until today and for a couple of months now (on bacula 2 from 2 weeks) im working on Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) i686-pc-linux-gnu redhat compiled from source on centos 4 i think the problem started from canceling a label co

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon stuck on a job

Hi, On 2/1/2007 3:06 PM, Joseph S. Rizzari wrote: > I have been doing some testing with Bacula 2.0.1 and my storage > daemon has is stuck on a job. > > My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug the > network cable to see how Bacula responds. > > Is there a setting that gi

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon stuck on a job

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:15:39AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: > On 2/1/07, Joseph S. Rizzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been doing some testing with Bacula 2.0.1 and my storage > > daemon has is stuck on a job. > > > > My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug >

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon stuck on a job

On 2/1/07, Joseph S. Rizzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been doing some testing with Bacula 2.0.1 and my storage daemon has is > stuck on a job. > > My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug the network > cable to see how Bacula responds. > > Is there a setting th

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon stuck on a job

I have been doing some testing with Bacula 2.0.1 and my storage daemon has is stuck on a job. My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug the network cable to see how Bacula responds. Is there a setting that gives the storage daemon a timeout so it can move to another job

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon hang

Hi, On 1/30/2007 6:58 PM, Joseph S. Rizzari wrote: > I have been doing some testing with Bacula and my storage daemon has hung. > > My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug the network > cable to see how Bacula responds. > > Is there a setting that gives the storage dae

[Bacula-users] Storage Daemon hang

I have been doing some testing with Bacula and my storage daemon has hung. My test was to back up a laptop and then during the backup unplug the network cable to see how Bacula responds. Is there a setting that gives the storage daemon a timeout so it can move to another job? Thanks, -- Josep

  1   2   >