On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:41, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > The SD does not "currently" need/use the DB (this will probably chang). > > However, some of the other tools that are built with the SD do need the DB, > > therefore the dependence. If you want ONLY the SD, for the current time, you > > can build it with any DB and it will work. > > Out of curiosity, what -- down the line -- would the -sd require a > database for? Config info?
Config info in the database -- never. Only people who have never done a bare metal recovery would think of such an implementation :-). bscan built into the SD. However, I *might* do that through the Director ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
