twg, in case you don't read all threads, please see my thread "Long
Term Economic Reform Plan". In particular, I request that you delay
"From each according to eir means" till next week. You may also want
to read the rest of the thread.
Thanks,
Aris
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:00 PM Reuben Staley
OOC: I'd say G.A.N.'s. Otherwise you're dropping number information. The
apostrophe makes it feel a lot more acceptable than G.A.N.s would.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID. A fine idea Style 1.5.
>
> OOC grammar question:
Actually, this probably should have been called a short term economic
reform plan, given that it would take place over a month at maximum. Oh
well.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:56 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, I've had an idea. There's a sequence of ch
Okay, I've had an idea. There's a sequence of changes to the current
economy that would end up with us still having land, but also adopting
G.'s point-based model. However, the sequence of operations is too
complex to be done in one go, so we're going to need to do this over
several weeks. Please n
I know it just sounded odd.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I was using G.A.N. in those instances as Great and Ancient Nomics.
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID. A fine idea Style 1.5.
>
I was using G.A.N. in those instances as Great and Ancient Nomics.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID. A fine idea Style 1.5.
>
> OOC grammar question: When the final noun in an acronym that uses full
> stops is pluralized: Do yo
Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 7:27 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> Receipt acknowledged.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Was this received? I didn't receive it.
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:53 PM Pub
Receipt acknowledged.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was this received? I didn't receive it.
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> >
> > I hereby submit the below argum
I received it
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 17:26 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was this received? I didn't receive it.
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> >
> > I hereby submit the below argument to the court on
Was this received? I didn't receive it.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
> I hereby submit the below argument to the court on the third docket:
>
> Your honor, I believe that the court should initiate a discussion of
> in what ways the G.A.N. of Agora, th
Forgot the misspelling.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:52 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
> I hereby submit the below argument to the court on the third docket:
>
> Your honor, I believe that the court should initiate a discussion of
> in what ways the G.A.N. of Agora, the G.A.N. of F.R.C.,
No, not yet, but you would be before the 14-day time limit expired, if you
weren't planning to continue - I assumed that was what you meant when you said
you "weren't even going to try to keep track of this". If that was wrong it's
no problem, naturally.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Actually, #12 and #20 (by Aris) are suitable different, that I'll address
> #12.
(correction: #11 by V.J. Rada, not #12. Is this your handwriting, Bernard?)
Actually, #12 and #20 (by Aris) are suitable different, that I'll address
#12.
Rule #6 is very precise. Counselors must "address each other" in a certain
way and everyone must "address each other" with respect.
"Us" (unlike "you") is not a form of address - in fact it's the opposite,
it's spe
Hey all, in case you don't want to read the legalese:
If you have any ore in your possession, all you have to do is say:
"I ship [N] ore to the foundry".
Then, come Monday (after the week starts), you can either say:
"I receive [13*N] coins from the foundry"
or if I get there first, I'll s
You cannot deputize for my office yet because I'm not behind on my duties
and I also intend to publish the next Cartographor report this Saturday.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 14:51 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> For each office: I intend to deputise for that office to publish its
> weekly report, if it wo
Just a reminder for everyone, if this is ruled INVALID, Corona and
Aris are both eliminated.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:00 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>> Your Honor, I respectfully submit the following argument on Docket #2:
>
> A model longstanding Nomic is the G.A.N. of Agora, under the auspices
> of
The problem with this methods is that people may wish to only change
something, if a separate change goes with it. With the current
conditional voting and the fact that it would be spread across many
distributions, that isn't a possible consideration.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:51 PM Timon Walshe-Gr
Also in the tournament-bug category: I deeply regret not making a 24-hour
limit on all challenges, not just impossibility-based ones.
I'm tempted (in character) to find some kind of statute-of-limitations
appropriate.
Be that as it may, I'll opine on our Pronoun Trouble (both in this one
and
Heh - you could hardly cross in the ether with your own message
but you're correct - no strike. (bug for future FRC: make crossed
in the ether only apply to someone *else's* rule that was only an
hour old).
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I do not believe that I
I do not believe that I should have received a strike for #12 as the
violation was of a rule that was put in place, less than an hour
before.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> https://agoranomic.org/Herald/birthday_tournament_2018.txt
>
> SUBMISSION STYLE
I believe that this should have been ruled INVALID as the "us"
references other Counselors and thus should have referenced them with
appropriate respect. Additionally, I ask the court whether INVALID
arguments will be counted towards the 10 non-procedural arguments.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM
Counselor, the Court is moved by your arguments (not now, Bernard) and
their appeal to "fun" as an underlying human principle (not NOW,
Bernard), and therefore finds this VAL... hold on.
(what IS it, Bernard?! I'm judging here, you'd better... ok ok I'll
read it... where did I say that befor
Yes.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Will you announce once someone has gone out?
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://agoranomic.org/Herald/birthday_tournament_2018.txt
> >
> > SUBMISSION STYLETIME (UTC
Thank you!
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:05 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> "the isqueal purpose of Nomic play".
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On July 13, 2018 9:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I'm sorry, this is probably there, but I can't find it
"the isqueal purpose of Nomic play".
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 13, 2018 9:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
>
> I'm sorry, this is probably there, but I can't find it. Where is the spelling?
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:00 AM Aris Merchant
>
> thoug
I'm sorry, this is probably there, but I can't find it. Where is the spelling?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:00 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> Your Honor, I respectfully submit the following argument on Docket #2:
>
> A model longstanding Nomic is the G.A.N. of Agora, under the auspices
> of which we now
Will you announce once someone has gone out?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> https://agoranomic.org/Herald/birthday_tournament_2018.txt
>
> SUBMISSION STYLETIME (UTC)
> #1 Aris:+0.905 Jul 2018 19:01:09
> #2 V.J. Rada: +1.0
28 matches
Mail list logo
