I know it just sounded odd.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I was using G.A.N. in those instances as Great and Ancient Nomics.
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID. A fine idea Style 1.5.
> >
> > OOC grammar question: When the final noun in an acronym that uses full
> > stops is pluralized: Do you say G.A.N.s or G.A.N. ('G.A.N.s' looks
> > wrong, 'G.A.N.' sounds wrong). I wouldn't invalidate dropping the .'s
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > > I hereby submit the below argument to the court on the third docket:
> > >
> > > Your honor, I believe that the court should initiate a discussion of
> > > in what ways the G.A.N. of Agora, the G.A.N. of F.R.C., BlogNomic, and
> > > other Nomics could cooperate towards mutual success. As an initial
> > > proposal, I believe that the G.A.N. and other Nomics could work
> > > together to recruit new p1@yers because they each have different
> > > styles, as has been discussed on the second docket, and thus, working
> > > together could offer options that appeal to most anyone. I hope that
> > > your honor and My Fellow Counselors will recognize the importance of
> > > cooperation across all G.A.N. and other Nomics.
> >
> >
> >
>
