Also in the tournament-bug category: I deeply regret not making a 24-hour
limit on all challenges, not just impossibility-based ones.
I'm tempted (in character) to find some kind of statute-of-limitations
appropriate.
Be that as it may, I'll opine on our Pronoun Trouble (both in this one
and in Aris's) together - probably not for a few hours at least though.
Your other question: "making" an argument includes invalid ones, so 10
regardless of validity.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I believe that this should have been ruled INVALID as the "us"
> references other Counselors and thus should have referenced them with
> appropriate respect. Additionally, I ask the court whether INVALID
> arguments will be counted towards the 10 non-procedural arguments.
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I present the following procedural argument to the court:
> >
> > Your most humble and gracious honour: the ridiculous requirements on us 411
> > regarding the f0rm of our arguments are piling up, detracting from the
> > quality of our arguments. I therefore ask the court to rule that no further
> > such requirements shall be imposed until at least 10 non-procedural
> > arguments are made.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I present the following procedural argument to the court:
> > >
> > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris seem to have no
> > > respect for the Great and Ancient Nomics. I ask the court that all
> > > Counselors SHALL refer to FRC and Agora as the Great and Ancient Nomic
> > > of the FRC and the Great and Ancient Nomic of Agora, respectively, in
> > > order to show respect not just to persons, but also for the Great and
> > > Ancient Nomics. Additionally, your honor, I ask the court that @11
> > > Counselors SHALL NOT use "wildly non-standard 5pe11ink" when
> > > addressing individuals, Great and Ancient Nomics, or the court, as
> > > doing so lessens the respect shown to the addressed person or entity.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
>
