OOC: I'd say G.A.N.'s. Otherwise you're dropping number information. The
apostrophe makes it feel a lot more acceptable than G.A.N.s would.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID. A fine idea Style 1.5.
>
> OOC grammar question: When the final noun in an acronym that uses full
> stops is pluralized: Do you say G.A.N.s or G.A.N. ('G.A.N.s' looks
> wrong, 'G.A.N.' sounds wrong). I wouldn't invalidate dropping the .'s
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > I hereby submit the below argument to the court on the third docket:
> >
> > Your honor, I believe that the court should initiate a discussion of
> > in what ways the G.A.N. of Agora, the G.A.N. of F.R.C., BlogNomic, and
> > other Nomics could cooperate towards mutual success. As an initial
> > proposal, I believe that the G.A.N. and other Nomics could work
> > together to recruit new p1@yers because they each have different
> > styles, as has been discussed on the second docket, and thus, working
> > together could offer options that appeal to most anyone. I hope that
> > your honor and My Fellow Counselors will recognize the importance of
> > cooperation across all G.A.N. and other Nomics.
>
>
>
>
