DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] Docket #3: Attempt #2

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

I was using G.A.N. in those instances as Great and Ancient Nomics.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nothing wrong that I see Counselor; VALID.  A fine idea Style 1.5.
>
> OOC grammar question:  When the final noun in an acronym that uses full
> stops is pluralized:  Do you say G.A.N.s or G.A.N.  ('G.A.N.s' looks
> wrong, 'G.A.N.' sounds wrong).  I wouldn't invalidate dropping the .'s
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> >  I hereby submit the below argument to the court on the third docket:
> >
> >  Your honor, I believe that the court should initiate a discussion of
> >  in what ways the G.A.N. of Agora, the G.A.N. of F.R.C., BlogNomic, and
> >  other Nomics could cooperate towards mutual success. As an initial
> >  proposal, I believe that the G.A.N. and other Nomics could work
> >  together to recruit new p1@yers because they each have different
> >  styles, as has been discussed on the second docket, and thus, working
> >  together could offer options that appeal to most anyone. I hope that
> >  your honor and My Fellow Counselors will recognize the importance of
> >  cooperation across all G.A.N. and other Nomics.
>
>
>