kef>
From: AF on behalf of Dev
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 4:28:25 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
Anyone know how much speed you can get through them on a 10MHz channel, and how
many subs each will handle?
On Dec 1, 20
Tarana THAT much better than 450 AP’s in 3.6?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no personal knowledge. If you ask Tarana, it has almost magical
>> abilities. One of those seems to be convincing government agencies handing
>> out grants that you can deliver 100/20 se
new equipment). We’re
like Rodney Dangerfield, we don’t get no respect.
From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@go-mtc.com
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 1:03 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
How large can you state the accuracy? Like
, December 1, 2024 11:48 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
For the lat/lon, yes. The first few months, I had a Garmin GPS and a TruPuls
laser rangefinder to determine the parameters onsite. Pretty quickly, I fou
Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
I would expect that many folks just dry lab’d the SAS info from Google Earth.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2024 5:30 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject:
I would expect that many folks just dry lab’d the SAS info from Google Earth.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2024 5:30 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
If you’re not currently using CBRS,
hype (not PMP320 though).
> Maybe it is magic, who knows, not me. Ask a Tigger, not an Eeyore.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Dev
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 30, 2024 2:59 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that
Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
PMP 320 with 10MHz channels, is that still even possibly legal? Don’t know what
throughput you can get from that. I also think that running these wherever
their 10MHz channel would have to
Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
PMP 320 with 10MHz channels, is that still even possibly legal? Don’t know what
throughput you can get from that. I also think that running these wherever
their 10MHz channel would h
>> Since they never switched to CBRS, I won’t ask if they bought any PALs.
>>
>> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On
>> Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
>> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2024 9:08 AM
>> To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com&
t; On Behalf
Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2024 9:08 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
Cc: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
Ugh is right.
Yes, they are not opera
won’t ask if they bought any PALs.
>
> From: AF On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2024 9:08 AM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Cc: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
>
> Ugh is right.
>
> Yes,
: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
Ugh is right.
Yes, they are not operating legally in CBRS.
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com>
On Nov 29
: Ken HohhofSent: Saturday, November 23, 2024 10:23 AMTo: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works Regarding dialup, we had 3 or 4 Ascend MAX4000 servers in Chicago and one in our WISP service area. We kept that one for awhile and
gt;
> From: AF On Behalf Of castarritt
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2024 9:32 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
>
> Yeah, 50 subs on a 900 and 100+ on a 2.4 FSK was perfectly fine, then Netflix
eventually did the same thing and were
very successful.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2024 10:23 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
Regarding dialup, we had 3 or 4 Ascend MAX4000 servers in Chicago
com> > On Behalf
Of Dev
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 6:05 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
The good news is they recently retired the two last dial-up customers! I didn’t
know that s
22, 2024 6:05 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
>
> The good news is they recently retired the two last dial-up customers! I
> didn’t know that still existed.
>
> They finally migrated the last customer of
On Behalf Of Dev
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 6:05 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
The good news is they recently retired the two last dial-up customers! I didn’t
know that still existed.
They finally migrated the las
like a Purewave WIMAX system and some Ubiquiti stuff and
>>another brand I don't recall, those were forklift upgrades.
>>That was like 5 years ago though. I know because my CPI cert is
>>about to expire.
>> Original Message
>>From: &qu
hough. I know because my CPI cert is
about to expire.
Original Message
From: "Dev" __
Sent: 11/22/2024 3:35:58 PM
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" __
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
Also, we’d have t
pire.
>
> Original Message
> From: "Dev"
> Sent: 11/22/2024 3:35:58 PM
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
>
> Also, we’d have to figure out how long it would take to swap
m: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists"
> Sent: 11/22/2024 3:32:53 PM
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works
>
> If it’s 3.65 that isn’t SAS capable, you are buying a large legal
> liability.
>
Yeah, check any licensed links for coordination.Regards,Jeff Jeff BroadwickCTIconnect312-205-2519 Office574-220-7826 Celljbroadw...@cticonnect.comOn Nov 22, 2024, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:Yeah, that has me confused. Surely they're not still running in pre CBRS mode? If yes, what other skeleto
If it is Cambium 450, we switched all of ours from Part 90 / NN to CBRS and I
don't remember having to change any hardware. Other 3.65 equipment like a
Purewave WIMAX system and some Ubiquiti stuff and another brand I don't recall,
those were forklift upgrades.That was like 5 years ago though.
We’re in the process of getting a list of skeletons.
They have 3.6GHz on some 450 radios, but apparently there are still some
(possibly 320 Wimax?) 3.6 radios sitting out there somewhere, apparently still
passing traffic to some subs. No one has said anything so they’re still
running.
> On N
Yeah, that has me confused. Surely they're not still running in pre CBRS mode?
If yes, what other skeletons are in their closet? Original Message
From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" Sent: 11/22/2024 3:32:53 PMTo: "AnimalFarm
Microwave Users Group" Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipme
I'm not following, can you elaborate? It's Friday, maybe I'm just more brain
dead than usual. Quote from TV show:"Can you repeat that more slowly, my friend
is hard of understanding." Original Message From: "Dev" Sent:
11/22/2024 3:26:44 PMTo: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" Subject:
Also, we’d have to figure out how long it would take to swap them, trying to
get a count of how much of a job this might be, i.e. how many subs.
> On Nov 22, 2024, at 1:31 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:
>
> If it’s 3.65 that isn’t SAS capable, you are buying a large legal liability.
>
> Reg
If it’s 3.65 that isn’t SAS capable, you are buying a large legal liability.Regards,Jeff Jeff BroadwickCTIconnect312-205-2519 Office574-220-7826 Celljbroadw...@cticonnect.comOn Nov 22, 2024, at 4:26 PM, Dev wrote:I think some may be in the old 3.6GHz, which is more of an issue because it gets in
I think some may be in the old 3.6GHz, which is more of an issue because it
gets in the way of the new 450 3.6GHz radio channel plan, so hoping not too
many subs out there.
> On Nov 22, 2024, at 12:11 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>
> 0 value on equipment
> acquisition value on customer
> cost of doi
0 value on equipment
acquisition value on customer
cost of doing business on swap
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:32 PM Dev wrote:
> Looking at purchasing a WISP that has old wireless equipment that’s no
> longer supported but happy customers connected to it. How do you set a
> value on a customer yo
Looking at purchasing a WISP that has old wireless equipment that’s no longer
supported but happy customers connected to it. How do you set a value on a
customer you know you’re going to have to swap client radios on and point to a
different AP, hopefully on the same tower?
--
AF mailing list
A
33 matches
Mail list logo
