Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works

trey Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:00:34 -0800

Yeah almost all the 450 except some of the very first versions are CBRs 
capable. If they still have pmp320s install there is a small chance that it is 
running legaly, but not likely I had a customer that had an extended 
grandfatherd license that was allowed to continue for a period of time while 
they were transitioning. However its not likely.


In this situation I would typicaly value these customers as negative for 
asuming the liability or at least they would be removed from the valuation I 
would recomend requireing them to be disabled before closing the deal.


On 11/22/24 5:48 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm fairly certain that all 450 hardware is CBRS capable, so that's justgoing to be a matter of upgrading firmware and getting everythingproperly configured and registered.


I don't think any wimax gear is CBRS capable.

At least some (probably most) LTE stuff can be upgraded to CBRS.

If it's a couple of old wimax APs with a small number of customers, it'sprobably not that big of a deal, if it's hundreds of customers... yikes.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024, 3:57 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com<mailto:khoh...@kwom.com>> wrote:


    If it is Cambium 450, we switched all of ours from Part 90 / NN to
    CBRS and I don't remember having to change any hardware. Other 3.65
    equipment like a Purewave WIMAX system and some Ubiquiti stuff and
    another brand I don't recall, those were forklift upgrades.

    That was like 5 years ago though. I know because my CPI cert is
    about to expire.

    ---- Original Message ----
    From: "Dev" __
    Sent: 11/22/2024 3:35:58 PM
    To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" __
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works

    Also, we’d have to figure out how long it would take to swap them,
    trying to get a count of how much of a job this might be, i.e. how
    many subs.

>     On Nov 22, 2024, at 1:31?PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists
>     <jeffl...@att.net <mailto:jeffl...@att.net>> wrote:
>
>     If it’s 3.65 that isn’t SAS capable, you are buying a large legal
>     liability.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Jeff
>
>     Jeff Broadwick
>     CTIconnect
>     312-205-2519 Office
>     574-220-7826 Cell
>     jbroadw...@cticonnect.com <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com>
>
>>     On Nov 22, 2024, at 4:26?PM, Dev <d...@logicalwebhost.com
>>     <mailto:d...@logicalwebhost.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     ?I think some may be in the old 3.6GHz, which is more of an issue
>>     because it gets in the way of the new 450 3.6GHz radio channel
>>     plan, so hoping not too many subs out there.
>>
>>>     On Nov 22, 2024, at 12:11?PM, Steve Jones
>>>     <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>     0 value on equipment
>>>     acquisition value on customer
>>>     cost of doing business on swap
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:32?PM Dev <d...@logicalwebhost.com
>>>     <mailto:d...@logicalwebhost.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Looking at purchasing a WISP that has old wireless equipment
>>>         that’s no longer supported but happy customers connected to
>>>         it. How do you set a value on a customer you know you’re
>>>         going to have to swap client radios on and point to a
>>>         different AP, hopefully on the same tower?

>>> -->>> AF mailing list

>>>         AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>>         http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>         <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>>

>>> -->>> AF mailing list

>>>     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>>     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
>>>     af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>

>> -->> AF mailing list

>>     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
>>     af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

> --> AF mailing list

>     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
>     af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

--AF mailing list

    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
    af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>


--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] Valuing obsolete equipment that still works

Reply via email to