Really??? When somebody calls me on skype, I can just vo right arrow to the 
accept button and it's there. I'm runing the latest skype and Lion.

On 26/06/2012, at 3:14 PM, Eric Oyen wrote:

> that key assignment was not set as default and in Skype 2.8 (which I use on 
> OS X 10.6) it doesn't even show as an assignment at all. I had to use a mute 
> Skype script. also, I have to set Skype to auto-answer as there doesn't 
> appear to be any way I can access the answer dialog (I know, I have tried 
> every method available here and no joy).
> 
> -eric
> 
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Matthew Campbell wrote:
> 
>> Hi.
>> What's wrong with pressing command shift M to mute Skype?
>> On 2012-06-25, at 8:39 PM, Eric Oyen wrote:
>> 
>>> applescript is as (if not more) powerful than the scripting interface for 
>>> jaws. since it is built-on to OS X, you can do a lot more with it than you 
>>> could in windows with jaws scripts. Apple scripts can be set up as system 
>>> services, application interfaces or even assigned to shortcuts. I use one 
>>> such to allow me to mute the mic in Skype. I am not sure you can do this 
>>> with jaws. anyway, that is my take on applescripts and OS X. at least, OS X 
>>> is designed with accessibility in mind (of which windows is not).
>>> 
>>> -eric
>>> 
>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Daniela Rubio wrote:
>>> 
>>>> VoiceOver has grown very fast in the last 3 years. Wait until Next OS is 
>>>> released, there are going to be nice surprises on accessibility. I have 
>>>> being working with tables in pages lastly and there is always a work 
>>>> around things. Why don't somebody, instead of creating a separated screen 
>>>> reader, makes Apple scripts to solve some issues? I think that VoiceOver y 
>>>> very powerful in combination with Applescript.
>>>> 
>>>> SALUDOS, DANIELA R.T.
>>>> MACNETICOS, APPLE Y ACCESIBILIDAD A TU ALCANCE.
>>>> EN TWITTER: @macneticos
>>>> NUESTRO BLOG EN:
>>>> www.macneticus.blogspot.com
>>>> Y EL PODCAST EN:`
>>>> http://macneticos.libsyn.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> El 25/06/2012, a las 20:26, Christopher-Mark Gilland escribió:
>>>> 
>>>>> Whole heartedly! agree.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Ray Foret Jr
>>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:42 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: is a paid screenreader for the mac a option?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Couldn't be more wrong.  Why you want to make the Mac more like clunky 
>>>>> crashy windows?  It's not up to the screen reader to make things more 
>>>>> accessible with more and more scripts which you have to keep up with; 
>>>>> rather, that's up to the app developers.  That's how it is in the Mac 
>>>>> world.  FS make a Mac screen reader?  Are you seriously kidding me?  No 
>>>>> way it ain't gonna happen.
>>>>> 
>>>>> GWMicro neither.  They already have enough on their plate worying about 
>>>>> windows type stuff.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Skype name:
>>>>> barefootedray
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:08 AM, William Windels wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> After working for more than 3 years with the mac , it's my personal 
>>>>>> opinionthat more basic programs are accessible on windows then on the 
>>>>>> mac platform.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I find it more stable to work on the mac because of the integration of 
>>>>>> the screenreader voiceover with the osx.
>>>>>> The fact that the hardware is also adapted for us by the trackpad and 
>>>>>> the function-keys with the spoken values.
>>>>>> And of course the flexible way we can install , manage the system with 
>>>>>> voiceover support everywhere.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, we can't e.g. configure dropbox with voiceover while this is 
>>>>>> possible on windows, office programs like microsoft office and also 
>>>>>> iWork's aren't fully accessible with lay-out tasks, in my opinion there 
>>>>>> are several usability      issues with the browsers on the mac, some 
>>>>>> ellements of the os , like 
>>>>>> Tables, on websites and on numbers and pages, are very difficult to 
>>>>>> navigate e.g. you can't search for edit-fields on websites while they 
>>>>>> are in a table and in pages, you can't work with tables on a comfortable 
>>>>>> way.
>>>>>> the icon's on the status bar, can't be reached on a normal way with 
>>>>>> voiceover...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My conclusion: a paid screenreader for the mac that makes program's 
>>>>>> accessible with scripts (like screen readers on windows do), should be 
>>>>>> very welcome I think.
>>>>>> With this kind of optional screenreader, blind users should be able to 
>>>>>> use all the equivalents on the mac of their windows favorites.  Perhaps 
>>>>>> it should push apple  to make their screenreader better on a faster 
>>>>>> speed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why such screenreader doesn't exist yet?
>>>>>> I see 2 reasons for this:
>>>>>> 1. Apple should not be happy with this and the screenreader of apple 
>>>>>> should have more possibilities to integrate with the os then the 
>>>>>> external screenreader.
>>>>>> 2. Other communities don't see a reason to make a screenreader for the 
>>>>>> mac while there is one built in.  
>>>>>> If it should be the second reason, any people with accessibility 
>>>>>> frustrations on the mac , should communicate this      to other 
>>>>>> companies like gw micro, freedom scientific, baum...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any opinions about this meanings should be very welcome.
>>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>> William Windels
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to