that key assignment was not set as default and in Skype 2.8 (which I use on OS 
X 10.6) it doesn't even show as an assignment at all. I had to use a mute Skype 
script. also, I have to set Skype to auto-answer as there doesn't appear to be 
any way I can access the answer dialog (I know, I have tried every method 
available here and no joy).

-eric

On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Matthew Campbell wrote:

> Hi.
> What's wrong with pressing command shift M to mute Skype?
> On 2012-06-25, at 8:39 PM, Eric Oyen wrote:
> 
>> applescript is as (if not more) powerful than the scripting interface for 
>> jaws. since it is built-on to OS X, you can do a lot more with it than you 
>> could in windows with jaws scripts. Apple scripts can be set up as system 
>> services, application interfaces or even assigned to shortcuts. I use one 
>> such to allow me to mute the mic in Skype. I am not sure you can do this 
>> with jaws. anyway, that is my take on applescripts and OS X. at least, OS X 
>> is designed with accessibility in mind (of which windows is not).
>> 
>> -eric
>> 
>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Daniela Rubio wrote:
>> 
>>> VoiceOver has grown very fast in the last 3 years. Wait until Next OS is 
>>> released, there are going to be nice surprises on accessibility. I have 
>>> being working with tables in pages lastly and there is always a work around 
>>> things. Why don't somebody, instead of creating a separated screen reader, 
>>> makes Apple scripts to solve some issues? I think that VoiceOver y very 
>>> powerful in combination with Applescript.
>>> 
>>> SALUDOS, DANIELA R.T.
>>> MACNETICOS, APPLE Y ACCESIBILIDAD A TU ALCANCE.
>>> EN TWITTER: @macneticos
>>> NUESTRO BLOG EN:
>>> www.macneticus.blogspot.com
>>> Y EL PODCAST EN:`
>>> http://macneticos.libsyn.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> El 25/06/2012, a las 20:26, Christopher-Mark Gilland escribió:
>>> 
>>>> Whole heartedly! agree.
>>>> 
>>>> Chris.
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Ray Foret Jr
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:42 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: is a paid screenreader for the mac a option?
>>>> 
>>>> Couldn't be more wrong.  Why you want to make the Mac more like clunky 
>>>> crashy windows?  It's not up to the screen reader to make things more 
>>>> accessible with more and more scripts which you have to keep up with; 
>>>> rather, that's up to the app developers.  That's how it is in the Mac 
>>>> world.  FS make a Mac screen reader?  Are you seriously kidding me?  No 
>>>> way it ain't gonna happen.
>>>> 
>>>> GWMicro neither.  They already have enough on their plate worying about 
>>>> windows type stuff.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>>>> 
>>>> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>>>> 
>>>> Skype name:
>>>> barefootedray
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:08 AM, William Windels wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> After working for more than 3 years with the mac , it's my personal 
>>>>> opinionthat more basic programs are accessible on windows then on the mac 
>>>>> platform.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I find it more stable to work on the mac because of the integration of 
>>>>> the screenreader voiceover with the osx.
>>>>> The fact that the hardware is also adapted for us by the trackpad and the 
>>>>> function-keys with the spoken values.
>>>>> And of course the flexible way we can install , manage the system with 
>>>>> voiceover support everywhere.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, we can't e.g. configure dropbox with voiceover while this is 
>>>>> possible on windows, office programs like microsoft office and also 
>>>>> iWork's aren't fully accessible with lay-out tasks, in my opinion there 
>>>>> are several usability      issues with the browsers on the mac, some 
>>>>> ellements of the os , like 
>>>>> Tables, on websites and on numbers and pages, are very difficult to 
>>>>> navigate e.g. you can't search for edit-fields on websites while they are 
>>>>> in a table and in pages, you can't work with tables on a comfortable way.
>>>>> the icon's on the status bar, can't be reached on a normal way with 
>>>>> voiceover...
>>>>> 
>>>>> My conclusion: a paid screenreader for the mac that makes program's 
>>>>> accessible with scripts (like screen readers on windows do), should be 
>>>>> very welcome I think.
>>>>> With this kind of optional screenreader, blind users should be able to 
>>>>> use all the equivalents on the mac of their windows favorites.  Perhaps 
>>>>> it should push apple  to make their screenreader better on a faster speed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why such screenreader doesn't exist yet?
>>>>> I see 2 reasons for this:
>>>>> 1. Apple should not be happy with this and the screenreader of apple 
>>>>> should have more possibilities to integrate with the os then the external 
>>>>> screenreader.
>>>>> 2. Other communities don't see a reason to make a screenreader for the 
>>>>> mac while there is one built in.  
>>>>> If it should be the second reason, any people with accessibility 
>>>>> frustrations on the mac , should communicate this      to other companies 
>>>>> like gw micro, freedom scientific, baum...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any opinions about this meanings should be very welcome.
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>> William Windels
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to