Nope, I don't have any of the three fun gadgets. :)

Teresa

On May 3, 9:35 am, Darcy Burnard <darcyburn...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Teresa.  Do you have an iphone or iPod touch?  If so, you might check out 
> the Joost app.  It's completely accessible, though it does drain the battery 
> quite quickly.  Probably no more than any other video app though.
> Darcy
>
> On 2010-05-03, at 11:43 AM, Teresa Cochran wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have mixed feelings about the whole debate. I will miss the sonokids
> > games and the Houghton-Mifflin geography game and the Curb game. I
> > sort of liked it when Joost switched to flash, because their stand-
> > alone app was even less accessible. However, it will be interesting to
> > see what comes of HTML5.
>
> > Teresa
>
> > On May 3, 7:50 am, "Carolyn" <ch...@q.com> wrote:
> >> Nic:
> >> bring on the coffee here please. There's eleven!
> >> Carolyn
>
> >>   ----- Original Message -----
> >>   From: Nicolai Svendsen
> >>   To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> >>   Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:32 AM
> >>   Subject: Re: Flash removed from OS X?
>
> >>   Hey,
>
> >>   Certainly. I've never seen so many messages hit the list that quickly. I 
> >> was sitting here going "No one has responded yet." I go to brew a load of 
> >> coffee, and when I come back I've got ten messages. I was a bit surprised.
>
> >>   Regards,
> >>   Nic
> >>   Mobile Me: nic2...@me.com
> >>   Skype: Kvalme
> >>   MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
> >>   AIM: cincinster
> >>   yahoo Messenger: cin368
> >>   Facebook Profile
> >>   My Twitter
>
> >>   On May 3, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
>
> >>   > Nic,
>
> >>   > It is a good discussion for debate. What it does is give folks an 
> >> opportunity to consider the benefits or lack there of where flash is 
> >> concerned. It also is a chance to consider whether Adobe would seriously 
> >> have a legal case. because there had been if I recall some threat made 
> >> over preventing flash on the iPhone. I recall something about lost revenue 
> >> or some such thing, but don't quote me on that. The entire discussion is 
> >> interesting for sure.
>
> >>   > On May 3, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>
> >>   >> Hi,
>
> >>   >> *grins* Darcy my secret is out!
>
> >>   >> Yes, it's not true. Maybe. What is echoed in that "Fake Steve Jobs" 
> >> post might happen someday, but I don't think Apple can actually force 
> >> Flash out of Mac OS X.
>
> >>   >> Well, it's not, since you can actually find this on Google quite 
> >> easily. Nonetheless, it was a very amusing read. It gave me the 
> >> opportunity to bring it up as a debate, actually, and it's very 
> >> interesting to hear people's thoughts, I'd say.
>
> >>   >> Regards,
> >>   >> Nic
> >>   >> Mobile Me: nic2...@me.com
> >>   >> Skype: Kvalme
> >>   >> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
> >>   >> AIM: cincinster
> >>   >> yahoo Messenger: cin368
> >>   >> Facebook Profile
> >>   >> My Twitter
>
> >>   >> On May 3, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Darcy Burnard wrote:
>
> >>   >>> Hi.  Being annoyed by flash is definitely not exclusively a blind 
> >> thing.  If it were, things like the click to flash plugin would not exist. 
> >>  
> >>   >>> Darcy
>
> >>   >>> On 2010-05-02, at 8:01 PM, marie Howarth wrote:
>
> >>   >>>> the truth of it only being the VI community is not exactly true. I 
> >> have friends who are in web design and they cannot stand flash. Several of 
> >> them are very happy with the now viable alternatives. flash makes it 
> >> "easy" for pretty much any one without much knowledge of writing code to 
> >> create a website, it also makes a lot of websites act eratically, and most 
> >> web designers, who do their jobs professionally will tell you the world 
> >> would be much better without flash clogging up websites. So sighted or 
> >> not, it's not just those of us who can't utilise the flash content, 
> >> professionals who design websites dislike it even more.
>
> >>   >>>> On 3 May 2010, at 00:08, Pete Nalda wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>> Haha!  Yes, good debate for sure.  I actually googled "Flash Being 
> >> removed from os X" and did come up with a "fake Steve Jobs Diary" tweet 
> >> report on techblips.com.  But no reference as to whether this was really 
> >> true.  I think it's a great debate, and something I think few people are 
> >> willing to debate, preferring to sweep it under the table.  Flash makes 
> >> designing websites with lots of dazzle fairly easy, but I think the 
> >> Visually Impaired community are the only ones who hate flash the most 
> >> because of its' inaccessibility to screenreaders.
>
> >>   >>>>> On May 2, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>   >>>>>> Hey, I guess that just answered my question. It might just be 
> >> replaced soon, though. Flash is getting old now, and we need a standard 
> >> that is just implemented, doesn't require any third-party plugins to work 
> >> like Flash essentially is, and doesn't crash your shit. That doesn't mean 
> >> HTML5 can't, but at least, we can see what is actually on HTML5 pages and 
> >> for good reason.
>
> >>   >>>>>> I just love starting these debates. Oops?
>
> >>   >>>>>> Regards,
> >>   >>>>>> Nic
> >>   >>>>>> Mobile Me: nic2...@me.com
> >>   >>>>>> Skype: Kvalme
> >>   >>>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
> >>   >>>>>> AIM: cincinster
> >>   >>>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
> >>   >>>>>> Facebook Profile
> >>   >>>>>> My Twitter
>
> >>   >>>>>> On May 2, 2010, at 11:24 PM, marie Howarth wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>>> how are you accessing them anyway sarah? Flash content is not 
> >> visible with VO
>
> >>   >>>>>>> On 2 May 2010, at 22:19, Sarah Alawami wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>>>> but how would twaudio work wiht out flash? you need to hit 
> >> recording buttons in order to use it if you wanted to record directly from 
> >> the website.
> >>   >>>>>>>> On May 2, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Kaare Dehard wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>> Hello, any platform could be argued to be better without 
> >> flash, it's a processor pig, is proprietary, and isn't keeping up 
> >> according to the wisdom of today. From a vo user's point of view, and even 
> >> ask the linux-kids, windows is the only platform where it is marginally 
> >> accessible. Something like html5 and h.264 streamed videos would work any 
> >> and everywhere without a proprietary plug in or so I've been lead to 
> >> believe.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>> Just my thoughts.
> >>   >>>>>>>>> On 2010-05-02, at 5:00 PM, Edward wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Hello
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> I am new to the list and wondering why no flash is good news? 
> >>  Is vo better
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> with other formats of streaming video?
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Edward
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of marie 
> >> Howarth
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:55 PM
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Flash removed from OS X?
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> really? Where did you hear such great news? ;)
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> On 2 May 2010, at 21:28, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Whoa, that's like...allout. I'm not sure what to say. Did I 
> >> expect
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> this? No.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Well, if no one figured this one out, Flash support is 
> >> apparently
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> being removed from OS X. I thought I'd be the first to post 
> >> this. I don't
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> think anyone else has. Same reasons that were made public in 
> >> Steve's letter
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> on thoughts on Flash.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Nic
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Mobile Me: nic2...@me.com
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Skype: Kvalme
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> AIM: cincinster
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Facebook Profile
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/people/Nicolai-Svendsen/509197277>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> My Twitter <http://twitter.com/chojiro>
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> Google
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>   >>>>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> Google Groups
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>   >>>>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>>> --
> >>   >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
> >>   >>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
> >>   >>>>>>>> --
> >>   >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
> >>   >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >>   >>>>>>>> For more options,
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to