it's a ridiculous concept. That would be like microsoft insisting on all handsets have to run windows mobile 7 or whatever it's called. Adobe is grasping at straws.
On 3 May 2010, at 00:27, Scott Howell wrote: > Adobe has no legal grounds as far as I can tell and would look rather stupid > trying to force Apple by going to court. Of course when you know your > products suck, you will do about anything to keep your position. :) > > On May 2, 2010, at 7:20 PM, carlene knight wrote: > >> Nick, it just took me a bit. I hate Flash, and always have. You should >> hear me mumble and grumble when my husband listens to podcasts blasgting >> Apple for not supporting Flash on their products as it is so essential. >> Adobe, last I knew, was considering litigation. Where in the law books does >> it say that a company can not choose what applications it supports. On May >> 2, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
