Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was, about that time, a ruling of Check Point vs. RadGuard (or > was that the other way around? Being as it is that I was interviewing > for both companies at the time the ruling was made, I tend not to > remember). > > I don't recall that case including customer lists, though.
I suspect Guy meant a different case. IIRC the CP vs. RG case was about a CP manager who went to do a very similar job for RG. CP sued but lost, the court saying that the freedom of occupation law superceded the non-compete clause the guy had in his CP contract. This case is often cited by employers in the context of "don't worry about the non-compete clause, it cannot eb enforced anyway". You hear that - suggest that it should be dropped altogether then. If anyone does drop it - do let me know, for the sake of my curiousity. It is unreasonable to think that this case sets a prwecedent for each and every situation. IANAL, but one nuance that struck me when I tried to think of implications on my own was that the person was (IIRC) a managerial type. Does this apply to a techie who carries a real technological edge in his (or her) head? Dunno... -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "IBM is a pretty big company." [W. Gates] ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
