Hi Viktor
> IMO HBIDE should offer Harbour standards as default > and let user override it. > I totally agree. > > Besides duplicating efforts and losing focus, it also > make HBIDE heavier and heavier, and I'm not sure it's > good idea to pull in large amount of unnecessary > code into memory just to edit source files. > > The last message I just throw some ideas as I wrote on the bottom of original message. For my personal use, HbIDE should have a damn good editor and debugger. Definition of damn good: * all needed features to edit *code* * help to edit code (code and symbol completion, parameters tips, conversions, some code generation, suggestions, etc) * tools to search and navigate through code easily and fast way * don't be intrusive * have every tool in hand (mainly by keyboard) * totally configurable * have predicable ways, consistency * be extensible * be stable and reliable * others points that I don't remember now :-) []'s Maniero
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
