Hi Antonio, > IMO HBIDE should offer Harbour standards as default > and let user override it. > > I totally agree. > > > Besides duplicating efforts and losing focus, it also > make HBIDE heavier and heavier, and I'm not sure it's > good idea to pull in large amount of unnecessary > code into memory just to edit source files. > > The last message I just throw some ideas as I wrote on the bottom of original > message. For my personal use, HbIDE should have a damn good editor and > debugger. > > Definition of damn good: > * all needed features to edit *code* > * help to edit code (code and symbol completion, parameters tips, > conversions, some code generation, suggestions, etc) > * tools to search and navigate through code easily and fast way > * don't be intrusive > * have every tool in hand (mainly by keyboard) > * totally configurable > * have predicable ways, consistency > * be extensible > * be stable and reliable > * others points that I don't remember now :-)
+1 for all of these. For anything else, probably an open plugin architecture is the best, so all of the remaining bits (like PostIt notes, GTD stuff can be implemented and maintained by users). We have the full power of .hrb files as a base for such. Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
