Hi Pritpal, >> 1) is there some reason for having s_slots and s_events handled by the >> programmer and not hidden someway ? >> > > Yes, because in Harbour we are calling Qt classes by function calls > instead of class/method calls. We cannot call Qt classes directly. > Though my explanation may appear a bit tough but this is how > Harbour bindings for Qt are implemented. We are calling Qt classes > from PRG level and not from C++ level.
Is it be possible to add slots and events holder variables to QApplication class? If technically possible, IMO it should be done to clean this part of QT. It wouldn't even be an incompatible change, just convenience, since these two holders are always needed for QT apps. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
