francesco perillo wrote:
>
> Or please tell us clearly why this is not possible... I believe Qt is
> a great "framework", a lot more than a framework and your work (hbide
> for example) shows how powerfull it is. And more, Qt is really
> documented: web sites, books and a lot of source code available to
> study on.... and it is a REAL PLUS for a harbour gui framework
>
> But if hbqt deviates too much from standard Qt.... a lot of docs won't
> match, code portability from c++ will not be easy....
>
I assume you have some framework in mind to achieve what you say.
Do you ? If yes, please post the code here for review and if the group
agrees, we will follow that pattern. Also keep in mind that it must be
backward compatible.
But if you expect this overhaul from me, I am sorry, I did my level
best to reach to this level and I know how much it is difficult to
establish code flow to acheive final results something like hbIDE.
Alternatively, you can start parallel development on this segment
and send the code here. I am sure someone more conversant with
C++ will join this effort. For now I am only concentrated on hbIDE.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/hbqt-a-couple-of-questions-tp4874292p4879384.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
