@Ayush and @PJ could I propose a 15 minute call to chat about your comments please? I think a higher bandwidth medium will save us some back and forth on the topic. If so, please email me directly with your schedules and I'll coordinate a time - else will put comments in the doc. Thanks in advance for your time.
Cheers, Stefan On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 5:59 PM Stefan Krawczyk <stefan.krawc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Apologies for the delay here (🤷♂️ *life *🤷♂️). > > @PJ, Ayush, and Kevin - thank you for the offer of mentoring. I have > shared this raw draft google doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12NdPEVJg993INoZeurMl6PqG4AX_qG9e-jm_3fxay8k/edit?usp=sharing> > with you that lays out the proposal. I thought this might be the simplest > way to work on the proposal. If anyone else wants access please just > request it. > > Thanks in advance. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 2:55 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Stefan. >> >> For people who agree to join the PPMC for Hamilton/Burr, they will >> need to sign ASF iCLAs anyway. >> >> So I don't think they'll need to agree to relicense as well. >> >> It's the people who don't agree to join the PPMC that we will have to >> look into asking to still sign the ASF iCLA or if that is unacceptable >> to them, a declaration like the one that you suggest may be an >> acceptable substitute. >> >> If we are still left with some code where the contributor has not >> signed an iCLA or agreed to the relicense, then we could leave that >> code as BSD licensed. It makes reviewing code and releases a bit >> harder when some code is licensed as Apache and some other code is >> BSD. >> >> Regards, >> PJ >> >> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 07:11, Stefan Krawczyk <stefan.krawc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Great, thank you. >> > >> > I believe my *more immediate* tasks then are: >> > >> > 1. Identify core committers outside of DAGWorks Inc. and get ICLAs. >> > 2. Get them to agree to a relicense. Could it be as simple as getting >> them >> > to write something like the following? >> > >> > > *Acknowledgment Statement* >> > > >> > > I, [Your Full Name], hereby agree to relicense my contributions to the >> > > Burr project under the Apache License, Version 2.0. I confirm that my >> > > contributions to the project were original and authored by me, and I >> grant >> > > permission to relicense them as outlined. >> > > >> > > Signed, >> > > [Your Name] [date] >> > > >> > 3. Work on draft >> > <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#proposal-template> >> > proposal >> > < >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/New+Podling+Proposal >> > >> > (I'm >> > following this <https://incubator.apache.org/cookbook/>) for each of >> > Hamiton and Burr. Then once I have that discuss whether one or two >> > committees makes the most sense. Question: it mentions a wiki, but I >> don't >> > see how I can create an account? Otherwise I can start it in a google >> doc... >> > >> > Is there anything else I should be doing in the near term? >> > >> > Thank you for the pointers thus far. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Stefan >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > > Don’t you mean SGA (and not CCLA)? >> > > >> > > We would also require an SGA. DAGWorks may want to submit a CCLA, but >> you >> > > are correct in that we don’t require one. >> > > >> > > Kind Regards, >> > > Justin >> > > >> > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
