glen wrote:
I agree. The crossover terms constrain the ungrounded phrases. The
more crossover terms, the more constrained the ungrounded terms. Had
Kevin said "What have you done to land you in that place in the
world?", then it would imply a more constrained space of possible
groundings. Prolly wouldn't have the necessary moralized narrative,
though.
I took it to be specifically manipulative, suggesting both credit and
blame to double-team the person being confronted with a "header and a
heeler", "a carrot and a stick"...
Is that in fact, the point of moralized narratives? To "herd" ?
Though I think Kevin's goal was actually "cutting" or "singling" in the
herding vernacular.
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ...
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
