Yes, a split where california splits of from the people's democratic Republic of America would be good for the californians. I certainly agree.
Do you think that people, not just US citizens, but everyone are entitled to due process before getting deported? Den ons 7 maj 2025 01:04'[email protected]' via Everything List < [email protected]> skrev: > The bottom line is that your fix for the world's ills have gotten us > nowhere. But because of ideology, you won't self correct. Promising and > never delivering is not a cool thing. That a plurality of the American > people have walked away from this should be no surprise. Deliver the goods > or go home. This is factual in the US, Canada and yes, dear Europe. No > excuses for Dem paymasters like the Open Society Foundation (George), The > Rockerfeller Brothers Fund, Reid Hoffman of LinkedIn, or some declining > Entertainment Bozos.While I have your attention, what do you feel about a > national split? Could it work? > > On Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 05:25:29 PM EDT, PGC <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 8:00:26 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > > Woke? no, I am anti-Woke. Simply cuz its damaging to the societies that do > woke crap, based on being nice nice on say, race, sex, with no other > discerning qualification, such as say, temperment, or math skill. Are you > going to hold yourself as the "authority," on all issues? I don't. > Especially, if I get my conclusions by people who seem to be accurate. But, > knock yourself out, if this suits you? > > > You’ve panicked and gone full kitchen sink—tariffs, Islamists, civil war, > John Kerry, Saul Alinsky, cobalt mines, hydrogen cars, witch trials, and a > 2014 oligarchy study—without addressing a single claim with real evidence > or updated economic data. That’s the clearest sign you’re dodging: flood > the conversation with chaos, so no fact can breathe. > > The MSN headline about manufacturers being “overwhelmed” sounds dramatic, > but it’s cherry-picked PR from trade groups and doesn't reflect sustained > economic impact. Real data shows Trump's tariffs raised costs for U.S. > companies and consumers, shrank export markets, and didn't bring supply > chains home. > [Source: Peterson Institute, Brookings, National Bureau of Economic > Research] > > As for AfD and immigration: nobody needs to “accuse”—AfD is officially > under surveillance by German intelligence for extremist ties. Jewish and > democratic watchdogs aren’t buying the “they’re just patriotic” spin. > That’s not witch-hunting, that’s called evidence-based national security. > [Source: Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), Deutsche Welle] > > But no, I am not for prohibiting them. They should, like you here, be made > to answer questions. Then everybody gets to see the full kitchen sink of > dodging + nonsense they're offering without the algorithmic glow of the > forbidden tinfoil thing only they have been able to uncover. > > Your rant about Gore promising hydrogen cars and being let down is cute, > but also irrelevant. Or do you feel entitled to get a car from voting? > Mitch, you just confused... boy. Meanwhile, EVs are booming thanks to > policies Gore advocated. That’s progress, not betrayal. > > Citing the 2014 “oligarchy” study from UPI doesn’t prove "your side" is > right—it proves the entire system has deep structural issues. But guess > what? Trump didn't dismantle oligarchy. He staffed it. Hedge funds, oil > barons, media owners—they didn’t lose power under him. They gained. > > On cobalt: yes, mining it is a serious ethical issue. So is oil > extraction, rare earth exploitation, and coal burning. Progress means > fixing the problems, not retreating into 1950s nostalgia with wood-fired > nationalist fantasy and tinfoil geopolitics. > > Finally, quoting Alinsky doesn’t cover the fact you haven’t offered a real > alternative—just a patchwork of slogans, resentments, and threats of civil > war. That’s not vision. That’s emotional escapism. And it's why > conspiratorial movements always have to up the ante: because reality > doesn't validate them—so the fiction must grow louder. > > And citing every topic under the sun to divert attention from the lack of > substance and no ability to read pie charts... Why anybody would talk > physics or fundamental science with you, who is both woke (where's my > hydrogen car, mom? Mom?! Look at me, I is doing Physics! Cuz I is as smart > as the woke cuz I post with them? I read PkD? I knows the bible...) and > anti-woke (tariffs, islamists, civil war, Alinsky). This is 1984 > doublespeak par excellence. > > Lol, ROI? Cutting fundamental cancer research because it lacks immediate > ROI is short-sighted. Fundamental discoveries often take years, sometimes > over a thousand—or a moment of insight—to revolutionize medicine, > engineering, and all the other woke projects running since 2000 years. > Penicillin, mRNA tech, CRISPR: all came from basic research. If we must > speak economically, fundamental science delivers the highest long-term > return of any human endeavor. The fact that we can’t predict when a > breakthrough comes is why we keep funding it. You suck up to woke authors, > hate the woke, call them Professor, pretend to be interested in their work, > like the sycophant culture around the guy, you were disillusioned with a > few years ago, only to vote him back in, and believe the Coollaid a second > time, with full access to evidence the first time around. > > Nah, you don't deserve to be silenced and I won't be your authority. You > deserve to be platformed for all to see. Like every despot-in-chief, like > the last time, and the times ahead. We need your historical example. And > nope, you don't need my refutation. I just have to hold up a pie chart and > you run to PKD, Alinsky, cry about your missing hydrogen car, and denounce > fundamental science while sucking dicks on a fundamental science list. > > And yes, people should see this over and over again. So post yourself > forward to forget this as fast as you can. And just go kitchen sink as far > out as you can to prove your "points". > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0d314f4b-ab87-4536-b3fd-9a1ba99c75dcn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0d314f4b-ab87-4536-b3fd-9a1ba99c75dcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1205119420.1125115.1746572636310%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1205119420.1125115.1746572636310%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAF0GBnhCy_isMCd5Ma6NF6-5o2x5GeAU%3D4jbFQ5padttTxGEgg%40mail.gmail.com.
