On Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 8:00:26 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
Woke? no, I am anti-Woke. Simply cuz its damaging to the societies that do woke crap, based on being nice nice on say, race, sex, with no other discerning qualification, such as say, temperment, or math skill. Are you going to hold yourself as the "authority," on all issues? I don't. Especially, if I get my conclusions by people who seem to be accurate. But, knock yourself out, if this suits you? You’ve panicked and gone full kitchen sink—tariffs, Islamists, civil war, John Kerry, Saul Alinsky, cobalt mines, hydrogen cars, witch trials, and a 2014 oligarchy study—without addressing a single claim with real evidence or updated economic data. That’s the clearest sign you’re dodging: flood the conversation with chaos, so no fact can breathe. The MSN headline about manufacturers being “overwhelmed” sounds dramatic, but it’s cherry-picked PR from trade groups and doesn't reflect sustained economic impact. Real data shows Trump's tariffs raised costs for U.S. companies and consumers, shrank export markets, and didn't bring supply chains home. [Source: Peterson Institute, Brookings, National Bureau of Economic Research] As for AfD and immigration: nobody needs to “accuse”—AfD is officially under surveillance by German intelligence for extremist ties. Jewish and democratic watchdogs aren’t buying the “they’re just patriotic” spin. That’s not witch-hunting, that’s called evidence-based national security. [Source: Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), Deutsche Welle] But no, I am not for prohibiting them. They should, like you here, be made to answer questions. Then everybody gets to see the full kitchen sink of dodging + nonsense they're offering without the algorithmic glow of the forbidden tinfoil thing only they have been able to uncover. Your rant about Gore promising hydrogen cars and being let down is cute, but also irrelevant. Or do you feel entitled to get a car from voting? Mitch, you just confused... boy. Meanwhile, EVs are booming thanks to policies Gore advocated. That’s progress, not betrayal. Citing the 2014 “oligarchy” study from UPI doesn’t prove "your side" is right—it proves the entire system has deep structural issues. But guess what? Trump didn't dismantle oligarchy. He staffed it. Hedge funds, oil barons, media owners—they didn’t lose power under him. They gained. On cobalt: yes, mining it is a serious ethical issue. So is oil extraction, rare earth exploitation, and coal burning. Progress means fixing the problems, not retreating into 1950s nostalgia with wood-fired nationalist fantasy and tinfoil geopolitics. Finally, quoting Alinsky doesn’t cover the fact you haven’t offered a real alternative—just a patchwork of slogans, resentments, and threats of civil war. That’s not vision. That’s emotional escapism. And it's why conspiratorial movements always have to up the ante: because reality doesn't validate them—so the fiction must grow louder. And citing every topic under the sun to divert attention from the lack of substance and no ability to read pie charts... Why anybody would talk physics or fundamental science with you, who is both woke (where's my hydrogen car, mom? Mom?! Look at me, I is doing Physics! Cuz I is as smart as the woke cuz I post with them? I read PkD? I knows the bible...) and anti-woke (tariffs, islamists, civil war, Alinsky). This is 1984 doublespeak par excellence. Lol, ROI? Cutting fundamental cancer research because it lacks immediate ROI is short-sighted. Fundamental discoveries often take years, sometimes over a thousand—or a moment of insight—to revolutionize medicine, engineering, and all the other woke projects running since 2000 years. Penicillin, mRNA tech, CRISPR: all came from basic research. If we must speak economically, fundamental science delivers the highest long-term return of any human endeavor. The fact that we can’t predict when a breakthrough comes is why we keep funding it. You suck up to woke authors, hate the woke, call them Professor, pretend to be interested in their work, like the sycophant culture around the guy, you were disillusioned with a few years ago, only to vote him back in, and believe the Coollaid a second time, with full access to evidence the first time around. Nah, you don't deserve to be silenced and I won't be your authority. You deserve to be platformed for all to see. Like every despot-in-chief, like the last time, and the times ahead. We need your historical example. And nope, you don't need my refutation. I just have to hold up a pie chart and you run to PKD, Alinsky, cry about your missing hydrogen car, and denounce fundamental science while sucking dicks on a fundamental science list. And yes, people should see this over and over again. So post yourself forward to forget this as fast as you can. And just go kitchen sink as far out as you can to prove your "points". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0d314f4b-ab87-4536-b3fd-9a1ba99c75dcn%40googlegroups.com.
