Doug Hughes <d...@will.to> writes:
> Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> > In an era where companies put a lot of efforts for tactical and operational 
> > staff to align every thing they do with the company strategic goals , I am 
> > always surprised that we hire people who excel at doing well in interviews 
> > over people who can actually the job the job we need them to.
> >
> >   
> I'm with another poster. If there were a better alternative, wouldn't 
> everybody be using it? All you have is a resume and interview(s). You 
> have to ask technical questions in order to prove that the resume is 
> accurate, but you have to ask other questions too. If the person fails 
> the interview process for stress or other reasons, that tells you 
> something about the candidate, too.

There is an alternative.  It's contract to hire.  If you are worth
me wasting a few hours talking to you, you are worth me paying you for 
a day or two of work.  (and, after that, if you seem okay, a week or a
month worth of work.  If it turns out you aren't any good, I thank you
for your time, pay you, and explain that I don't have any more work for 
you.) 

Personally, I think it's more respectful of the job seekers time, too.
I mean, really, you expect me to sit in a room and get grilled for two to
six hours, without pay? 


> I suppose there's always nepotism and cronyism. ;)

I actually think some of the biggest problems with corporate america
are a result of being too overzealus about avoiding that sort of thing..
I mean, prefered vendor lists?  those started as a way to avoid cronyism,
right?  they've turned into a way to institutionalize cronyisim.  

I know I'm a whole lot more likely to give a chance to someone I know, 
or who knows someone I know simply because I know a lot more about that
person than I know about someone who randomly gave me a resume.  

-- 
Luke S. Crawford
http://prgmr.com/xen/         -   Hosting for the technically adept
http://nostarch.com/xen.htm   -   We don't assume you are stupid.  
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to