Yves Dorfsman wrote: > In an era where companies put a lot of efforts for tactical and operational > staff to align every thing they do with the company strategic goals , I am > always surprised that we hire people who excel at doing well in interviews > over people who can actually the job the job we need them to. > > I'm with another poster. If there were a better alternative, wouldn't everybody be using it? All you have is a resume and interview(s). You have to ask technical questions in order to prove that the resume is accurate, but you have to ask other questions too. If the person fails the interview process for stress or other reasons, that tells you something about the candidate, too.
I suppose there's always nepotism and cronyism. ;) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
