Mark Dennehy <mark.denn...@gmail.com> writes: > I've seen good companies where it would be a good idea, certainly; but I've > also seen cases which were dodgy (as in, high court fraud case dodgy), and > where contract-to-hire would translate as "hire someone at lower pay for > three months, then fire them and hire someone new for three months at lower > pay and repeat ad infinitum".
If you want to hire someone capable of getting a good full-time job on a contract basis, generally speaking, you need to pay a pretty good premium. What I've seen at places that hire contract/temporary but don't pay a premium (/many/ body shops do this) is that you get people willing to take it, sure, but those people are inexperienced or otherwise not good enough to get a good permanant job. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
