Am 07/30/2014 09:57 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On 7/30/14, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/30/2014 12:02 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On 7/30/14, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/30/2014 11:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/28/2014 09:43 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 07/28/2014 07:07 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 07/28/2014 01:05 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 07/26/2014 10:16 PM, Tal Daniel wrote:
Don't you think this page should exist elsewhere, not on the site?
maybe
on
openoffice.apache.org> native language section? It's feels as a
status
page, rather than a page for visitors.
Tal
I think it's just where it is for historical purposes, and I see
your
point. We can move it.
Anyway, my "new" version is at:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
Even after I suggested it, I'm not sure I'm 100% happy with my
simpler
definitions. See the definition for "maintained". The download
links
from these pages work, but some are NOT to a localized download due
to
editing (by me some weeks ago) to at least get them to some correct
download area. :/ So, what to do with these gray areas?
Nonactive/non-maintained websites will, eventually, be removed from
the
language selection box;a call for volunteers is also appropriate, in
order
to revive such a website (another column?)
yes...
choosing the language from the drop-down-box is a fast and cheap way
to
come to unmaintained webpages that have the large hint (we have to
make
this sure) to help to get it complete again.
So, I think it would not be good to delete it from the selection.
Ok, I just changed the definitions slightly and corrected some errors
I'd made in assessment yesterday as well. This needs another pair of
eyes!
again, at:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
Maybe we should take the content (current or outdated) and the work on
it (maintained or help wanted) into account? With this we can say,
e.g.,
"outdated + maintained". This means that the content is old but there
is
someone who is working on updates.
Here my further idea:
current The website is OK and needs no help.
outdated The website has old content and needs to be updated.
maintained Someone is already actively working on the website.
help wanted Volunteers are welcome to help updating the website.
the discussion about formatting is all fine and all good. But without
content is doesn't matter, right? ;-)
Please can we first finalize the content. Then we can beautifying the
webpage step by step.
Thanks
Marcus
That would be nice! :)
I just put the page with the changes I made recently into production at:
http://www.openoffice.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
Not sure how that is necesarry thats why we have a staging site. I
would publish the current mdtext, and then see the next changes on
staging.
Maybe a bit of an explanation. I published the mdtext but it gets
converted to html on publication. The mdtext had been in stating for a
few days. This is still only a "working" document since it is not the
one being linked, and I thought for non-committers, this way might be
easier. Maybe I'm wrong about that.
I am mostly on a KISS (Keep it simple stupid) creating '-new'
documents are mostly a bad idea since is not surprise we have a lot of
'*-new' documents somewhat polluting the site tree.
no problem, they can be deleted.
Non-commiters can always post their version on their hosts (I try to
use people.apache.org) but there is always space on google drive, or
github to put your version with your tweaks, maybe is a good test case
to move to GIT and work with branches. I suggest checking out gitflow
for a good workflow system when dealing with git commiters.
This would *maybe* solve a problem we don't have now. ;-)
Sorry, but this dicussion lead to nowhere.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
