On 8/3/14, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 07/30/2014 02:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 07/30/2014 10:50 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >>> >>> >>> On 07/30/2014 01:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 07/30/2014 08:51 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 07/30/2014 11:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>>>> Am 07/28/2014 09:43 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>>>>>> Am 07/28/2014 07:07 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/28/2014 01:05 AM, Tal Daniel wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 07/26/2014 10:16 PM, Tal Daniel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Don't you think this page should exist elsewhere, not on the >>>>>>>>>>> site? >>>>>>>>>>> maybe >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> openoffice.apache.org> native language section? It's feels as >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> status >>>>>>>>>>> page, rather than a page for visitors. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tal >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think it's just where it is for historical purposes, and I see >>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>> point. We can move it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Anyway, my "new" version is at: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even after I suggested it, I'm not sure I'm 100% happy with my >>>>>>>>>> simpler >>>>>>>>>> definitions. See the definition for "maintained". The download >>>>>>>>>> links >>>>>>>>>> from these pages work, but some are NOT to a localized download >>>>>>>>>> due to >>>>>>>>>> editing (by me some weeks ago) to at least get them to some >>>>>>>>>> correct >>>>>>>>>> download area. :/ So, what to do with these gray areas? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nonactive/non-maintained websites will, eventually, be removed >>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>> language selection box;a call for volunteers is also >>>>>>>>> appropriate, in >>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>> to revive such a website (another column?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yes... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> choosing the language from the drop-down-box is a fast and cheap >>>>>>> way to >>>>>>> come to unmaintained webpages that have the large hint (we have to >>>>>>> make >>>>>>> this sure) to help to get it complete again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, I think it would not be good to delete it from the selection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, I just changed the definitions slightly and corrected some >>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>> I'd made in assessment yesterday as well. This needs another pair >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> eyes! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> again, at: >>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe we should take the content (current or outdated) and the >>>>>>> work on >>>>>>> it (maintained or help wanted) into account? With this we can say, >>>>>>> e.g., >>>>>>> "outdated + maintained". This means that the content is old but >>>>>>> there is >>>>>>> someone who is working on updates. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here my further idea: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> current The website is OK and needs no help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> outdated The website has old content and needs to be updated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> maintained Someone is already actively working on the website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> help wanted Volunteers are welcome to help updating the website. >>>>>> >>>>>> the discussion about formatting is all fine and all good. But without >>>>>> content is doesn't matter, right? ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Please can we first finalize the content. Then we can beautifying the >>>>>> webpage step by step. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Marcus >>>>> >>>>> That would be nice! :) > > Ok, back to these ideas above. In my mind -- > > maintained -> current, and current -> maintained so these are one in the > same from a logical standpoint despite nuances in definition. > > In a similar fashion, outdated -> unmaintained -> help wanted. > So why not just call it "unmaintained" and provide some further > explanation by what is meant by this versus a separate entry in the table.
So, not sure if the idea on having icons instead of terms was approved or not. I heard people were welcoming of them. The license issue was sorted out by using fontawesome but I still dont see the table with the changes. What is the case for *NOT* having these icons? > > Mostly, I am just trying to keep the maintenance and general > understanding of this page simpler for everybody. > > >>>>> >>>>> I just put the page with the changes I made recently into production >>>>> at: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/projects/native-lang-new.html >>>>> >>>>> so it should be easy for others to make further changes. >>>> >>>> thats not what I wanted. IMHO we haven't finished our discussion about >>>> status (and maybe further content). >>>> >>>> Marcus >>> >>> Well I will not be the least bit upset if you revert this change. >> >> ahm no ;-) What I meant is, we were in the discussion of the status, I >> made a further suggestion (see above: current, outdated, maintained and >> help wanted) and then it turnd into how to style the text. >> >> I just want to get the discussion back to the topic as IMHO we have not >> an agreed text. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." > -- Simon Wiesenthal > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
