On 07/30/2014 01:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 07/30/2014 08:51 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>>
>> On 07/30/2014 11:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>> Am 07/28/2014 09:43 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>> Am 07/28/2014 07:07 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07/28/2014 01:05 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Kay Schenk<kay.sch...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/26/2014 10:16 PM, Tal Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>>> Don't you think this page should exist elsewhere, not on the site?
>>>>>>>> maybe
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> openoffice.apache.org> native language section? It's feels as a
>>>>>>>> status
>>>>>>>> page, rather than a page for visitors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it's just where it is for historical purposes, and I see
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> point. We can move it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, my "new" version is at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even after I suggested it, I'm not sure I'm 100% happy with my
>>>>>>> simpler
>>>>>>> definitions. See the definition for "maintained". The download links
>>>>>>> from these pages work, but some are NOT to a localized download
>>>>>>> due to
>>>>>>> editing (by me some weeks ago) to at least get them to some correct
>>>>>>> download area. :/ So, what to do with these gray areas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonactive/non-maintained websites will, eventually, be removed
>>>>>> from the
>>>>>> language selection box;a call for volunteers is also appropriate, in
>>>>>> order
>>>>>> to revive such a website (another column?)
>>>>>
>>>>> yes...
>>>>
>>>> choosing the language from the drop-down-box is a fast and cheap way to
>>>> come to unmaintained webpages that have the large hint (we have to make
>>>> this sure) to help to get it complete again.
>>>>
>>>> So, I think it would not be good to delete it from the selection.
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I just changed the definitions slightly and corrected some errors
>>>>> I'd made in assessment yesterday as well. This needs another pair of
>>>>> eyes!
>>>>>
>>>>> again, at:
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should take the content (current or outdated) and the work on
>>>> it (maintained or help wanted) into account? With this we can say,
>>>> e.g.,
>>>> "outdated + maintained". This means that the content is old but
>>>> there is
>>>> someone who is working on updates.
>>>>
>>>> Here my further idea:
>>>>
>>>> current The website is OK and needs no help.
>>>>
>>>> outdated The website has old content and needs to be updated.
>>>>
>>>> maintained Someone is already actively working on the website.
>>>>
>>>> help wanted Volunteers are welcome to help updating the website.
>>>
>>> the discussion about formatting is all fine and all good. But without
>>> content is doesn't matter, right? ;-)
>>>
>>> Please can we first finalize the content. Then we can beautifying the
>>> webpage step by step.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>
>> That would be nice! :)
>>
>> I just put the page with the changes I made recently into production at:
>>
>> http://www.openoffice.org/projects/native-lang-new.html
>>
>> so it should be easy for others to make further changes.
>
> thats not what I wanted. IMHO we haven't finished our discussion about
> status (and maybe further content).
>
> Marcus
Well I will not be the least bit upset if you revert this change.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved."
-- George MacDonald
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
