On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote: > > I think the image structure on the website is a bit messy, there has been > > some cleanup done by kschenk but I think there is still a lot of clean up > > work to be done. > > > > For example, the new logo, was simply draged and drop to the AOOLogos > > folder with a huge name. I understand the name was needed to identify it > > between the rest of the competitive logos. But now that is selected, the > > current name is unecessary long. > > > > Apache_OpenOffice_Logo_ChrisR_selected_2013-06_optim_300w.png< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/Apache_OpenOffice_Logo_ChrisR_selected_2013-06_optim_300w.png?view=log > > > > > > Right. That work is incomplete. I checked it in originally, after > the logo vote, so we could start working on the product integration > immediately. But note that the above logo is not the one we actually > used in AOO 4.0 !! > > The one we actually used is this one: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branding/Apache_OpenOffice_Logo_ChrisR_selected_2013-06_Inkscape_kg.svg > > This was Chris R's contest logo with some minor technical changes. > Kevin G. used this and generated the PNG/JPG files for AOO 4.0, which > I helped check in. > > My intent was to take that SVG and rename it to "master-logo-40.svg" > Again I think we do need a convention for a "logo.svg" as opposed to ending with a logo-30.svg logo-40.svg logo-50.svg. An just incrementally replace with the future logos as we update the SVG. > or something clean like that. However, I have not had any luck > getting this logo to load into Inkscape or Adobe Illustrator. I get > errors. And I have not had any luck getting Kevin to send a version > that will load. > > So we're stuck right now with a logo that does load into Inkscape, but > is slightly different than the one we used in AOO 4.0. > > > At the same time we have old logos which had been untouch. I think the > > webdevs have small understanding of a svn is builted so that the files > are > > updated without having different versions laying arround. Over this > > example, ooo-logo.png and > > AOO4_website_logo.png< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png?view=log > >exist. > > > > All these proliferation of logos, usually will built up to become > > incredibly messy to work. I suggest to put the information such as > author, > > version, status, etc. on the comments of the commit and not on the > > filename. Likewise to take the time to look for the source of the image, > > since there is an SVG/ folder to link the source of them, and finally if > > there are different images (sizes) to have a common convention. > > > > A more logical naming scheme would be good, I agree. But this has > been waiting for resolution of which SVG we should actually be using. > > Regards, > > -Rob > > > > If you want to review the images please go here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/ > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > Apache OpenOffice Contributor > > http://www.openoffice.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org
