Interesting, adding "-ana" suffix to a dc which is meant to be an analytical one was pretty common in cases I saw. People just want to look at it and see the difference, how do they name it then? dc2? Also, omitting 2 letters does not seem like a typo to me either.
Anyway, we are clearly after the other so CASSANALYTICS be it. On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 3:03 PM Jon Haddad <j...@rustyrazorblade.com> wrote: > +1 to CASSANALYTICS > > a fierce -1 to CASSANA. I’ve never once in my life seen this convention > and id prefer clarity over saving a handful of characters. > > — > Jon Haddad > Rustyrazorblade Consulting > rustyrazorblade.com > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:57 PM Štefan Miklošovič <smikloso...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> CASSANA would do it. CASSANALYTICS is just too long. People are used to >> the terminology of "ana" e.g. when naming their analytics data centers. >> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 2:55 PM Bernardo Botella < >> conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 to CASSANALYTICS >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2024, at 1:48 PM, Yifan Cai <yc25c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> yep. CASSANALYTICS sounds good to me. +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:45 PM Francisco Guerrero <fran...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Can we include Cassandra Analytics to the infra ticket? I am looking >>>> > forward to jira project name suggestions for it... >>>> >>>> How about CASSANALYTICS ? >>>> >>>> On 2024/10/17 18:50:45 Yifan Cai wrote: >>>> > Can we include Cassandra Analytics to the infra ticket? I am looking >>>> > forward to jira project name suggestions for it... >>>> > >>>> > - Yifan >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:46 AM Patrick McFadin <pmcfa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > I think it needs a bit more blue. Maybe some pink stripes. I'll >>>> file a >>>> > > Jira. >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:01 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> Thanks everyone, I've created >>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26212 >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Kind Regards, >>>> > >> Brandon >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova >>>> > >> <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > It would have been nice to be in red italic but… :-) >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > Thanks, Brandon, +1 to the suggestion on my end too. Sounds >>>> reasonable >>>> > >> to me >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 17:50, Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote: >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> +1 to CASSDRIVER-JAVA et al. >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> On Oct 17, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Jon Haddad < >>>> j...@rustyrazorblade.com> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> Sgtm, let’s ship it >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> +1 >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09 AM Brandon Williams < >>>> dri...@gmail.com> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> Nobody wants to suggest a color for this bikeshed? I'll start: >>>> > >> >>> CASSDRIVER-<language>. I'd like to get on this sooner than >>>> later since >>>> > >> >>> during the time we wait the situation worsens. >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> Kind Regards, >>>> > >> >>> Brandon >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 5:07 PM Brandon Williams < >>>> dri...@gmail.com> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > >>>> > >> >>> > I think we just need to ask infra to create the jira >>>> instances, but >>>> > >> I >>>> > >> >>> > guess we need to have some kind of consistent naming scheme >>>> to help >>>> > >> >>> > identify them? >>>> > >> >>> > >>>> > >> >>> > Kind Regards, >>>> > >> >>> > Brandon >>>> > >> >>> > >>>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 1:02 PM Francisco Guerrero < >>>> > >> fran...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> >>> > > +1 too on the points brought by Mick, we need more >>>> visibility into >>>> > >> >>> > > subprojects. For starters, we should look into integrating >>>> Qbot >>>> > >> >>> > > notifications in #cassandra-dev and #cassandra-noise for >>>> > >> >>> > > CASSANDRASC tickets. Let me know if I can help with that. >>>> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> >>> > > On 2024/10/02 17:39:28 Yifan Cai wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > > +1 on all the points raised by Mick. Please let me know >>>> if >>>> > >> there is >>>> > >> >>> > > > anything I can help with. >>>> > >> >>> > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > - Yifan >>>> > >> >>> > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:13 AM Josh McKenzie < >>>> > >> jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - Qbot notifications in #cassandra-dev and >>>> #cassandra-noise , >>>> > >> as well as >>>> > >> >>> > > > > in any subproject channels >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - some cadence of dev@ ML updates, e.g. on >>>> activities, or >>>> > >> dependency >>>> > >> >>> > > > > changes, etc >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - regular releases >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > Agree on all 3 points. Also - I've *definitely* fallen >>>> off on >>>> > >> the project >>>> > >> >>> > > > > updates for mainline; I'll pick that back up after >>>> ApacheCon. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, at 1:57 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > To play devil's advocate here, it's important that the >>>> > >> subprojects don't >>>> > >> >>> > > > > lose visibility and silo from the rest of the project. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > There are different ways to solve this, and lumping >>>> > >> everything into one >>>> > >> >>> > > > > jira project is a messy and poor way of doing it. But >>>> as the >>>> > >> sidecar has >>>> > >> >>> > > > > shown us, subproject activity should somehow be made >>>> noisy to >>>> > >> us. We need >>>> > >> >>> > > > > sorts of common spaces in the project. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > If we go the separate jira project route, then some >>>> > >> suggestions to help >>>> > >> >>> > > > > with this are: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - Qbot notifications in #cassandra-dev and >>>> #cassandra-noise , >>>> > >> as well as >>>> > >> >>> > > > > in any subproject channels >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - some cadence of dev@ ML updates, e.g. on >>>> activities, or >>>> > >> dependency >>>> > >> >>> > > > > changes, etc >>>> > >> >>> > > > > - regular releases >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 04:11, Dinesh Joshi < >>>> djo...@apache.org> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > hi folks - sorry to have dropped the ball on >>>> responding to >>>> > >> this thread. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > My 2 cents are as follows - >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > 1. Having a separate JIRA project for each sub-project >>>> will >>>> > >> add management >>>> > >> >>> > > > > overhead. This option, however, allows us to model >>>> unique >>>> > >> workflows for the >>>> > >> >>> > > > > sub-project. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > 2. Managing the sub-project as part of the Cassandra >>>> JIRA >>>> > >> project would >>>> > >> >>> > > > > imply less management overhead but the sub-project >>>> would need >>>> > >> to conform to >>>> > >> >>> > > > > the same workflows. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > I would pick option 1 unless there is a strong reason >>>> and >>>> > >> desire to manage >>>> > >> >>> > > > > a separate Jira project. We can always split out the >>>> Java >>>> > >> Driver project if >>>> > >> >>> > > > > things don't work out. OTOH merging a Jira project is >>>> harder. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > Thanks, >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > Dinesh >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:45 PM Abe Ratnofsky < >>>> a...@aber.io> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > CEP-8 proposes using separate Jira projects per >>>> Cassandra >>>> > >> sub-project: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-8%3A+DataStax+Drivers+Donation >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > > We suggest distinct Jira projects, one per driver, >>>> all to >>>> > >> be created. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > I don't see any discussion changing that from the >>>> [DISCUSS] >>>> > >> or vote >>>> > >> >>> > > > > threads: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01pljcncyjyo467l5orh8nf9okrh7oxm >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/opt630do09phh7hlt28odztxdv6g58dp >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/crolkrhd4y6tt3k4hsy204xomshlcp4p >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > But looks like upon acceptance that was changed: >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dhov01s8dvvh3882oxhkmmfv4tqdd68o >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > > New issues will be tracked under the CASSANDRA >>>> project on >>>> > >> Apache’s JIRA < >>>> > >> >>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CASSANDRA> >>>> under the >>>> > >> component >>>> > >> >>> > > > > ‘Client/java-driver’. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > I'm in favor of using the same Jira as Cassandra >>>> proper. >>>> > >> Committership is >>>> > >> >>> > > > > project-wide, so having a standardized process (same >>>> ticket >>>> > >> flow, review >>>> > >> >>> > > > > rules, labels, etc. is beneficial). But multiple votes >>>> > >> happened based on >>>> > >> >>> > > > > the content of the CEP, so we should stick to what was >>>> voted >>>> > >> on and move to >>>> > >> >>> > > > > a separate Jira. >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > -- >>>> > >> >>> > > > > Abe >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > > >>>> > >> >>> > > > >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>>
