I'm with Jon here, -1 to CASSANA and +1 to CASSANALYTICS.

Kind Regards,
Brandon

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 4:00 PM Jon Haddad <j...@rustyrazorblade.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to CASSANALYTICS
>
> a fierce -1 to CASSANA. I’ve never once in my life seen this convention and 
> id prefer clarity over saving a handful of characters.
>
> —
> Jon Haddad
> Rustyrazorblade Consulting
> rustyrazorblade.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:57 PM Štefan Miklošovič <smikloso...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>>
>> CASSANA would do it. CASSANALYTICS is just too long. People are used to the 
>> terminology of "ana" e.g. when naming their analytics data centers.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 2:55 PM Bernardo Botella 
>> <conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to CASSANALYTICS
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2024, at 1:48 PM, Yifan Cai <yc25c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> yep. CASSANALYTICS sounds good to me. +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:45 PM Francisco Guerrero <fran...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Can we include Cassandra Analytics to the infra ticket? I am looking
>>>> > forward to jira project name suggestions for it...
>>>>
>>>> How about CASSANALYTICS ?
>>>>
>>>> On 2024/10/17 18:50:45 Yifan Cai wrote:
>>>> > Can we include Cassandra Analytics to the infra ticket? I am looking
>>>> > forward to jira project name suggestions for it...
>>>> >
>>>> > - Yifan
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:46 AM Patrick McFadin <pmcfa...@gmail.com> 
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I think it needs a bit more blue. Maybe some pink stripes. I'll file a
>>>> > > Jira.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:01 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> 
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> Thanks everyone, I've created
>>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26212
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Kind Regards,
>>>> > >> Brandon
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
>>>> > >> <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > It would have been nice to be in red italic but… :-)
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Thanks, Brandon, +1 to the suggestion on my end too. Sounds 
>>>> > >> > reasonable
>>>> > >> to me
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 17:50, Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> +1 to CASSDRIVER-JAVA et al.
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> On Oct 17, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Jon Haddad <j...@rustyrazorblade.com>
>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> Sgtm, let’s ship it
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> +1
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>>
>>>> > >> >>> Nobody wants to suggest a color for this bikeshed?  I'll start:
>>>> > >> >>> CASSDRIVER-<language>. I'd like to get on this sooner than later 
>>>> > >> >>> since
>>>> > >> >>> during the time we wait the situation worsens.
>>>> > >> >>>
>>>> > >> >>> Kind Regards,
>>>> > >> >>> Brandon
>>>> > >> >>>
>>>> > >> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 5:07 PM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> >
>>>> > >> >>> > I think we just need to ask infra to create the jira instances, 
>>>> > >> >>> > but
>>>> > >> I
>>>> > >> >>> > guess we need to have some kind of consistent naming scheme to 
>>>> > >> >>> > help
>>>> > >> >>> > identify them?
>>>> > >> >>> >
>>>> > >> >>> > Kind Regards,
>>>> > >> >>> > Brandon
>>>> > >> >>> >
>>>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 1:02 PM Francisco Guerrero <
>>>> > >> fran...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > +1 too on the points brought by Mick, we need more visibility 
>>>> > >> >>> > > into
>>>> > >> >>> > > subprojects. For starters, we should look into integrating 
>>>> > >> >>> > > Qbot
>>>> > >> >>> > > notifications in #cassandra-dev and #cassandra-noise for
>>>> > >> >>> > > CASSANDRASC tickets. Let me know if I can help with that.
>>>> > >> >>> > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > On 2024/10/02 17:39:28 Yifan Cai wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > +1 on all the points raised by Mick. Please let me know if
>>>> > >> there is
>>>> > >> >>> > > > anything I can help with.
>>>> > >> >>> > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > - Yifan
>>>> > >> >>> > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:13 AM Josh McKenzie <
>>>> > >> jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - Qbot notifications in #cassandra-dev and 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > #cassandra-noise ,
>>>> > >> as well as
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > in any subproject channels
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - some cadence of dev@ ML updates, e.g. on activities, or
>>>> > >> dependency
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > changes, etc
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - regular releases
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > Agree on all 3 points. Also - I've *definitely* fallen 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > off on
>>>> > >> the project
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > updates for mainline; I'll pick that back up after 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > ApacheCon.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, at 1:57 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > To play devil's advocate here, it's important that the
>>>> > >> subprojects don't
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > lose visibility and silo from the rest of the project.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > There are different ways to solve this, and lumping
>>>> > >> everything into one
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > jira project is a messy and poor way of doing it.  But as 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > the
>>>> > >> sidecar has
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > shown us, subproject activity should somehow be made 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > noisy to
>>>> > >> us.  We need
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > sorts of common spaces in the project.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > If we go the separate jira project route, then some
>>>> > >> suggestions to help
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > with this are:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - Qbot notifications in #cassandra-dev and 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > #cassandra-noise ,
>>>> > >> as well as
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > in any subproject channels
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - some cadence of dev@ ML updates, e.g. on activities, or
>>>> > >> dependency
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > changes, etc
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > - regular releases
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 04:11, Dinesh Joshi 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > <djo...@apache.org>
>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > hi folks - sorry to have dropped the ball on responding to
>>>> > >> this thread.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > My 2 cents are as follows -
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > 1. Having a separate JIRA project for each sub-project 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > will
>>>> > >> add management
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > overhead. This option, however, allows us to model unique
>>>> > >> workflows for the
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > sub-project.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > 2. Managing the sub-project as part of the Cassandra JIRA
>>>> > >> project would
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > imply less management overhead but the sub-project would 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > need
>>>> > >> to conform to
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > the same workflows.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > I would pick option 1 unless there is a strong reason and
>>>> > >> desire to manage
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > a separate Jira project. We can always split out the Java
>>>> > >> Driver project if
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > things don't work out. OTOH merging a Jira project is 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > harder.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > Thanks,
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > Dinesh
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:45 PM Abe Ratnofsky 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > <a...@aber.io>
>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > CEP-8 proposes using separate Jira projects per Cassandra
>>>> > >> sub-project:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-8%3A+DataStax+Drivers+Donation
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > We suggest distinct Jira projects, one per driver, all 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > to
>>>> > >> be created.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > I don't see any discussion changing that from the 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > [DISCUSS]
>>>> > >> or vote
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > threads:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/01pljcncyjyo467l5orh8nf9okrh7oxm
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/opt630do09phh7hlt28odztxdv6g58dp
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/crolkrhd4y6tt3k4hsy204xomshlcp4p
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > But looks like upon acceptance that was changed:
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dhov01s8dvvh3882oxhkmmfv4tqdd68o
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > New issues will be tracked under the CASSANDRA project 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > > on
>>>> > >> Apache’s JIRA <
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CASSANDRA> under 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > the
>>>> > >> component
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > ‘Client/java-driver’.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > I'm in favor of using the same Jira as Cassandra proper.
>>>> > >> Committership is
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > project-wide, so having a standardized process (same 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > ticket
>>>> > >> flow, review
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > rules, labels, etc. is beneficial). But multiple votes
>>>> > >> happened based on
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > the content of the CEP, so we should stick to what was 
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > voted
>>>> > >> on and move to
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > a separate Jira.
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > --
>>>> > >> >>> > > > > Abe
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > > >
>>>> > >> >>> > > >
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to