debian-vote  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Raul Miller
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Oliver Elphick
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free John Lines
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Andrew Suffield
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Michael Banck
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free John Lines
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Raul Miller
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Steve Langasek
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Sven Luther
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Santiago Vila
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Branden Robinson
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Rene Engelhard
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Martin Schulze
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Martin Schulze
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Craig Sanders
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Anthony Towns
  • Re: summary of software licenses in non-free Gerardo Ballabio
• Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Steve Langasek
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raphael Hertzog
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Tore Anderson
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Dale E Martin
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Steve Langasek
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michael Banck
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage MJ Ray
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Craig Sanders
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Steve Langasek
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Michelle Konzack
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Hamish Moffatt
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage John Goerzen
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Kenshi Muto
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Raul Miller
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Drew Scott Daniels
  • Re: Statistics on non-free usage Sven Luther
• one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony Towns
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anand Kumria
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Don Armstrong
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Don Armstrong
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Don Armstrong
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Jeroen van Wolffelaar
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Jeroen van Wolffelaar
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Jeroen van Wolffelaar
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Martin Schulze
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony Towns
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: OT: unicorn, was: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony Towns
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Oliver Elphick
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew Suffield
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony Towns
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Raul Miller
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Hamish Moffatt
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Hamish Moffatt
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Craig Sanders
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Anthony Towns
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Steve Langasek
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Manoj Srivastava
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Oliver Elphick
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea MJ Ray
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • We *can* be Free-only John Goerzen
  • Re: We *can* be Free-only Anthony Towns
  • Re: We *can* be Free-only John Goerzen
  • Re: We *can* be Free-only Anthony Towns
  • Re: We *can* be Free-only Hamish Moffatt
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea John Goerzen
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Sven Luther
  • Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea Michael Banck

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]