On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 00:16, John Goerzen wrote: > Indeed. Let us do a service for our users and provide them with only > the software that they can legally use, modify, distribute, and hack on, > together with documentation that meets those criteria.
This is just silly! Software without the documentation is not really usable. You are plainly saying that we should cease to make this documentation available to users because it will make Debian impure. I do not see any proposal for replacing it (nor would such a proposal be at all realistic). This is not keeping the promise we made and it is not in the interests of our users. I do not share your absolutist ideas about DFSG purity. Inconveniencing users because you want to be purer than FSF is a ridiculous position. You would make Debian as irrelevant as all the splinter socialist parties there used to be 30 years ago (maybe they are still around), condemning each other for slight differences of doctrine and having no effect at all on political life. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." Matthew 5:8
