> > Note that debian-private also does not meet DFSG, and is not guaranteed > > by the social contract. > > > > If the only point here is that debian resources shouldn't be used to > > distribute non-DFSG stuff we should place getting rid of debian-private > > at a higher level of priority than non-free.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:07:00PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > debian-private is fairly low-traffic. I think you mean "getting rid of > non-public-list email", which includes listmaster, debian-admin, and > all the developer addresses. It's the restriction on redistribution that's at issue here. -- Raul
