On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:51:24AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > While "Don't respond to Craig Sanders" is usually a good idea, I feel > compelled to point out to anybody casually watching that the parent > post is pure FUD; read it with a critical mind and you should find the > flaws. The first paragraph, for example, is entirely delusional.
ah, the first refuge of the incompetent and the bogus - you can't argue with the points raised or the facts provided, so attack the person. with any luck, the disturbing content will be lost/forgotten in the ensuing flamewar. craig
