debian-release  

Messages by Date

• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Colin Watson
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/11 Re: snafu in libopencdk upload Colin Watson
• 2004/07/11 Re: Switching exim4 to libdb4.2 Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/10 Re: Switching exim4 to libdb4.2 Steve Langasek
• 2004/07/10 snafu in libopencdk upload Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/07/10 Switching exim4 to libdb4.2 Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/09 You need to save money on Meds Lisa Morgan
• 2004/07/09 Re: kurush: please remove from testing Colin Watson
• 2004/07/08 kurush: please remove from testing Ondřej Surý
• 2004/07/07 Re: documento info
• 2004/07/05 Overnight shipping 4500 Rosalee Mckeon
• 2004/07/04 Re: summary of the release status Kenshi Muto
• 2004/07/04 summary of the release status Andreas Barth
• 2004/07/03 These rates on homes won't last forever N G Jackson
• 2004/07/03 And the winner is ... Matthias Urlichs
• 2004/07/02 These rates on homes won't last forever F J Young
• 2004/07/02 Alert from virusscanner mailscanner
• 2004/07/01 Re: Re: Here faxerr
• 2004/07/01 Health, Happiness and Fortune Gonzales, Orville
• 2004/07/01 Re: Let cups in by ignoring a bug in QT? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/07/01 You'll need your tracking # W7 424196 Sheri Hewitt
• 2004/06/30 don't waste money on herbal concoctions, get the real deal and pay less Pearlie Brey
• 2004/06/30 Re: Let cups in by ignoring a bug in QT? Colin Watson
• 2004/06/30 Let cups in by ignoring a bug in QT? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/29 Re: non-US Steve McIntyre
• 2004/06/28 Re: xmbmon not entering testing because of Architecture: change Colin Watson
• 2004/06/28 xmbmon not entering testing because of Architecture: change Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Andrew Pollock
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Andrew Pollock
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Andrew Pollock
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/06/27 Re: What's with a non-released version in sarge? Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/27 What's with a non-released version in sarge? Andrew Pollock
• 2004/06/26 So why not save some money? Colette George
• 2004/06/26 Re[1]: Everette Rasmussen
• 2004/06/26 Re: Please hint together: petsc and illuminator Colin Watson
• 2004/06/26 Re: status of non-US? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/25 Re: status of non-US? Branden Robinson
• 2004/06/25 Re: SableVM 1.1.5-1 seems to need a hint again Colin Watson
• 2004/06/24 Re: mass bug gnustep programs: policy violation Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/24 SableVM 1.1.5-1 seems to need a hint again Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2004/06/24 Re: libdv (the chainsaw solution) Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/24 qualify Key
• 2004/06/24 Re: mass bug gnustep programs: policy violation Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/24 Re: libdv (the chainsaw solution) Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/23 Please hint together: petsc and illuminator Adam C Powell IV
• 2004/06/23 Re: libdv (the chainsaw solution) Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/23 libdv (the chainsaw solution) Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/23 《緊急情報のお知らせ！簡単確実 １００％嘘偽り一切なし！》 hot
• 2004/06/22 Re: status of non-US? Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/22 Re: status of non-US? Matt Zimmerman
• 2004/06/22 status of non-US? Frederik Schueler
• 2004/06/22 OEMCDSoftware.ManySpecialOffers Meministri
• 2004/06/22 Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/21 Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/21 Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation Anthony Fok
• 2004/06/20 Re: zsi for testing Wichert Akkerman
• 2004/06/20 Re: Remove SNUI and phtml from testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/20 Re: zsi for testing Colin Watson
• 2004/06/20 zsi for testing Matthias Klose
• 2004/06/20 Remove SNUI and phtml from testing Matthew Palmer
• 2004/06/20 产品换广告-北京 dfit2004dfit
• 2004/06/19 Re: Testing hints needed for tilp & libticalcs4 ? Colin Watson
• 2004/06/19 Delivery Failure (msn_newsletters@hotmail.com) MSN Hotmail
• 2004/06/19 Testing hints needed for tilp & libticalcs4 ? Julien BLACHE
• 2004/06/18 推荐工具软件，负责上门安装，价格双方协商 hxjj
• 2004/06/18 Re: further removal suggestions Frank Lichtenheld
• 2004/06/18 Re: further removal suggestions Colin Watson
• 2004/06/18 Re: further removal suggestions Russ Allbery
• 2004/06/18 further removal suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/18 bum Kurtz
• 2004/06/17 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Martin Pitt
• 2004/06/16 Re: more removal suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/16 Re: more removal suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/16 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Raphael Hertzog
• 2004/06/15 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Anthony Towns
• 2004/06/15 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Tim Dijkstra
• 2004/06/15 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/14 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Martin Schulze
• 2004/06/14 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2004/06/14 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Andrew Shugg
• 2004/06/14 testing-proposed-updates approval requested for subversion 1.0.0-1sarge2 Jeroen van Wolffelaar
• 2004/06/14 Re: Juk and kopete can be removed Christopher Martin
• 2004/06/14 Your Woman's Day Customer Service Request womansday
• 2004/06/14 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/06/14 Re: Juk and kopete can be removed Colin Watson
• 2004/06/14 Juk and kopete can be removed Christopher Martin
• 2004/06/14 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Robert Millan
• 2004/06/14 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Andrew McMillan
• 2004/06/14 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Bas Zoetekouw
• 2004/06/14 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Peter Eisentraut
• 2004/06/14 Powerful weightloss now available where you are. Margaret McCray
• 2004/06/14 Re: Debian and militarist propaganda Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/06/14 Debian and militarist propaganda Robert Millan
• 2004/06/14 Re: Sarge and real i386-boxes Goswin von Brederlow
• 2004/06/14 Mon, 14 Jun 2004 05:28:25 -0600 Debian-qa
• 2004/06/14 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/06/14 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Martin Pitt
• 2004/06/13 Re: more removal suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/13 Re: Bug#231538: A possible solution GOTO Masanori
• 2004/06/13 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
• 2004/06/13 New powerful weightloss for you. Otis W. Pagan
• 2004/06/13 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/06/13 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Martin Schulze
• 2004/06/13 Sarge and real i386-boxes Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/13 Re: Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
• 2004/06/13 Upgrading stable postgresql to 7.2.4 Martin Pitt
• 2004/06/12 Re: cyrus-sasl2 not considered, RC bugs are +fixed Adeodato Simó
• 2004/06/12 Removing the hint on pcmcia-cs Per Olofsson
• 2004/06/12 cyrus-sasl2 not considered, RC bugs are +fixed Adeodato Simó
• 2004/06/12 New powerful weightloss for you. Wilbert Oconnor
• 2004/06/12 Re: this bug is RC Joey Hess
• 2004/06/12 Re: Hinting kudzu/pciutils Colin Watson
• 2004/06/12 Re: Hinting kudzu/pciutils Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/11 Re: this bug is RC Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/11 this bug is RC Joey Hess
• 2004/06/11 Re: Hinting kudzu/pciutils Colin Watson
• 2004/06/11 Hinting kudzu/pciutils Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/10 Re: hinting cyrus-sasl2 and cyrus-sasl2-mit? Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/10 Non-Delivery Notification postmaster . a . reuters . lon
• 2004/06/10 hinting cyrus-sasl2 and cyrus-sasl2-mit? Adeodato Simó
• 2004/06/09 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/09 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Martin Michlmayr
• 2004/06/09 Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:18:25 -0600 Brain Meyer
• 2004/06/08 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/08 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/06/08 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/08 more removal suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/07 Bug#253229: Please add libfribidi0 to the debootstrap package list Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/07 RC-bugcount at bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php revisited Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/06 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Andreas Metzler
• 2004/06/06 Powerful weightloss now available for you. Shelia T. Long
• 2004/06/06 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
• 2004/06/06 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/05 Re: removal / ignore suggestions Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/05 Re: Request for removal of eris from testing Steve Langasek
• 2004/06/05 James Allen Did Not Recieve Your Message James Allen
• 2004/06/05 UNSUBSCRIBE Fredrik
• 2004/06/05 Powerful weightloss now available for you. Cory Martinez
• 2004/06/04 Re: Re: gif-producing code and sarge Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/06/03 Письмо Uncomplaining V. Unhealthiest
• 2004/06/02 Re: Re: gif-producing code and sarge Joe Buck
• 2004/06/02 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Nathanael Nerode
• 2004/06/02 removal / ignore suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/06/02 Request for removal of eris from testing Michael Koch
• 2004/06/01 Re: Why does imagemagick not go into sarge? Adam D. Barratt
• 2004/06/01 Why does imagemagick not go into sarge? Joaquin Ortega
• 2004/05/31 Save big, by your OEM Software from us. Pat Hardy
• 2004/05/29 Banner free hosting provider,perfecter Heriberto
• 2004/05/28 Re: {pciutils,kudzu} -> sarge? Joe Buck
• 2004/05/28 Re: telnet, ftp, and ssl Colin Watson
• 2004/05/28 Re: telnet, ftp, and ssl J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
• 2004/05/27 Re: {pciutils,kudzu} -> sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/05/27 {pciutils,kudzu} -> sarge? Joe Buck
• 2004/05/27 Re: Mail Delivery (failure support@csr.esurance.com) [#31154] support
• 2004/05/27 Re: telnet, ftp, and ssl Andreas Metzler
• 2004/05/27 telnet, ftp, and ssl Robert Millan
• 2004/05/27 this was wht we were discussing Debian-release Moises Collins
• 2004/05/26 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/05/26 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Pascal Hakim
• 2004/05/25 Male muscle boosting system ann ruiz
• 2004/05/24 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now - Thx Daniel Cardenas - AZ
• 2004/05/24 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Andreas Barth
• 2004/05/24 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/05/24 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Andreas Barth
• 2004/05/24 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Andreas Barth
• 2004/05/24 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Anthony Towns
• 2004/05/24 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Anthony Towns
• 2004/05/23 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/05/23 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Matthew Palmer
• 2004/05/23 Re: gif-producing code and sarge? Colin Watson
• 2004/05/23 grow Beryl Barrow
• 2004/05/23 aggressive removal suggestions Andreas Barth
• 2004/05/23 gif-producing code and sarge? Andreas Barth
• 2004/05/23 Bug#250531: please remove gcc-3.2 from unstable Matthias Klose
• 2004/05/23 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Martin-Éric Racine
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Martin Schulze
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Clint Adams
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Thiemo Seufer
• 2004/05/22 Re: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable Sebastien Bacher
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Sebastien Bacher
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Martin-Éric Racine
• 2004/05/22 Re: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable Martin-Éric Racine
• 2004/05/22 Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable] Sebastien Bacher
• 2004/05/22 Re: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable Michael Banck
• 2004/05/22 GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable Martin-Éric Racine
• 2004/05/22 What to do about penis problems... Gabriel Mcclain
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Sebastien Bacher
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Sebastien Bacher
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... James A. Morrison
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Steve Langasek
• 2004/05/22 Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ... Colin Watson

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]