On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:30:59AM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 08:52, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:15:12AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > Considering that it doesn't look like the freeze is really going to > > > take place any time soon, > > > > If the SC vote goes in such a way as to indicate that the project is > > happy to release sarge in roughly its current state, I think we should > > be freezing really quite shortly after that, and I think we're in a > > position to do so given d-i's current state of readiness. > > I'm detecting a certain amount of maintainers being discouraged by the > whole process personally. Since the SC vote is still quite a fair bit > away, I'm not sure we'll be able to accomplish much until that issue is > sorted out.
I would encourage people to do their best to stay in a state of release readiness. > When it is sorted out, we can start making a schedule again with a > freeze schedule. This actually has a chance of working if the installer > looks good. Experience suggests that we need to start schedules in advance of the things that are blocking them, where possible ... -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
