On 2004-06-06 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:07:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: [...] > > # wrong shell code, patch sitting since Mar 14 there, in non-free > > remove maelstrom/1.4.3-L3.0.5-3
> Given that I find 210 usages of test test1 -a test2 in 175 postinsts on > my local system, and only four of those postinst scripts declare > /bin/bash as an interpreter, I would like to see a POSIX citation for > this bug That is easy.[1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html -a is an XSI extension > before we endure the joy of that particular mass-bugfiling. > Comment sent to the bug submitter. I'm inclined to tag this as > sarge-ignore regardless of the outcome, given the number of affected > packages and the minimal concrete impact. [...] I fully agree. "Any POSIX compatible shell" is not very helpful, without naming which version of POSIX, and up until some moths ago we interpreted it as "runs on dash". ;-) Now we have posh available... cu andreas [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=susv3+posix third hit. -- "See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
