tags 250622 +pending thanks * Anthony Fok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040622 05:55]: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok) remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139) > > # no maintainer reaction > > remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > > # reverse depends: songwrite, alml > > remove songwrite/0.12b-3 > > remove alml/2004.05.21-1 > > Please don't remove lilypond... A new packaged was prepared, finished > building it at 2004-06-18 04:36 +0800, > and uploaded 2004-06-19 06:27+0800. > > It is currently in the queue waiting for manual overrides AFAIK. > I splitted the architecture-independent part into the lilypond-data > binary package.
Well, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to solve a RC-bug with an upload that needs to go through NEW. Also, if that information would have been in the bug log, I wouldn't have proposed removal. I removed that from my removal-suggestions-list, but of course, it's the release managers decision. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C