On 2004-07-11 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> You also appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7 to
>>>> libpth2.
>>> libgcrypt7 has not changed.
[...]
> Breakage will only occur for packages linking against
> libgcrypt-pth.so.7.3.0.
Hello,
Well, as already discussed on IRC in #debian-release I've searched for
packages using libgcrypt-pth.so.7 and came up with zero hits.[1]
This offers two additional posbilities for fixing the whole issue:
* Stop providing libgcrypt-pth in libgcrypt7.
* Make litph2 a recommends instead of a depends.
I do not like the later possibility, but tjhat is just imho. Matthias,
what do you think about dropping libgcrypt-pth in libgcrypt7?
cu andreas
[1]
merkel:> grep-dctrl -FDepends -n -sFilename libgcrypt7 \
/org/ftp.root/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-ia64/Packages |\
while read i ; do dpkg -x /org/ftp.root/debian/$i gcry
done
merkel:> cd gcry && find -type f -exec objdump -p '{}' \; > objdumps
There is no references to libpth in objdumps. - And sarge showed
identical results.
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
