debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2004/11/26 kissfft Paul Brossier
• 2004/11/26 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Andrew Suffield
• 2004/11/26 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/25 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Don Armstrong
• 2004/11/25 警告！ウイルスチェックサー ビス VirusCheckService
• 2004/11/24 Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is Alessandro Rubini
• 2004/11/24 Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is Jan Minar
• 2004/11/24 Re: zwiki copyright status Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2004/11/24 Re: firmware : which license "less worse" available Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/24 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/23 firmware : which license "less worse" available Benoit Audouard
• 2004/11/23 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Ben Pfaff
• 2004/11/23 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Don Armstrong
• 2004/11/23 Request for IPR review Mark Johnson
• 2004/11/23 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/23 Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation) Ben Pfaff
• 2004/11/23 Re: Bug#282667: microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is Giacomo A. Catenazzi
• 2004/11/23 microcode.ctl: License clarification request: the microcode update file can't be distributed the way it is Jan Minar
• 2004/11/23 Weird notices in phpBB 2.0.11 Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/22 Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/22 witch licence Vincent, Robin
• 2004/11/20 Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/20 Re: zwiki copyright status Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2004/11/20 Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/20 Re: GPL compatible license? Anthony DeRobertis
• 2004/11/19 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/19 Re: o'reilly Anthony W. Youngman
• 2004/11/19 Re: GPL compatible license? Matthew Garrett
• 2004/11/19 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/19 Post to gentoo-gwn@robin.gentoo.org denied gentoo-gwn+owner
• 2004/11/19 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/18 Home delivery Meds Hope Helms
• 2004/11/18 Re: zwiki copyright status Simon Michael
• 2004/11/17 Re: Audacity and portaudio Matt Brubeck
• 2004/11/17 Re: Audacity and portaudio Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/17 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/17 Re: Audacity and portaudio Matt Brubeck
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/16 Re: Audacity and portaudio Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Gustavo Noronha Silva
• 2004/11/16 Audacity and portaudio Matt Brubeck
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/16 Re: o'reilly Michael Poole
• 2004/11/16 o'reilly Christopher Priest
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Ken Arromdee
• 2004/11/16 Re: GPL compatible license? Andrew Suffield
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/15 Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/15 Re: portaudio license Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/15 GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
• 2004/11/15 3D- C library Aranzazu Bereciartua Perez
• 2004/11/14 Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/14 Re: portaudio license Dave Cunningham
• 2004/11/13 Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/13 Re: portaudio license Dave Cunningham
• 2004/11/13 Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/13 Re: portaudio license Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/13 Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony W. Youngman
• 2004/11/13 portaudio license Dave Cunningham
• 2004/11/12 Re: Bug#280864: turck-mmcache: linking against php4 violates license Elizabeth Fong
• 2004/11/12 Re: zwiki copyright status Bob McElrath
• 2004/11/12 Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/12 Re: [gnu.org #214407] AutoReply concerning licensing question: Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard via RT
• 2004/11/12 Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/12 Re: zwiki copyright status Michael Poole
• 2004/11/12 zwiki copyright status Bob McElrath
• 2004/11/12 Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Andres Salomon
• 2004/11/11 Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/11 Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/11 Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL Don Armstrong
• 2004/11/11 Re: turck-mmcache license violation? cascardo
• 2004/11/11 turck-mmcache license violation? Andres Salomon
• 2004/11/11 Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL Matthias Klose
• 2004/11/11 Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses MJ Ray
• 2004/11/11 Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses Matthew Garrett
• 2004/11/11 Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses MJ Ray
• 2004/11/10 Bug#280673: apt-howto: APT HOWTO is under a non-free license Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/10 review of DK and IIM patent licenses Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/11/09 Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/09 Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/09 Re: Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Michael Poole
• 2004/11/09 Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Don Armstrong
• 2004/11/09 Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Isaac Clerencia
• 2004/11/09 Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Isaac Clerencia
• 2004/11/09 Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Gustavo Noronha Silva
• 2004/11/09 Everyone Need This Debian-laptop-request Bernice Marcus
• 2004/11/08 Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Josh Triplett
• 2004/11/08 APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/08 Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? MJ Ray
• 2004/11/06 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Henning Makholm
• 2004/11/06 Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Sebastian Feltel
• 2004/11/06 Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Andrew Suffield
• 2004/11/06 Re: Open Profanity License Florian Weimer
• 2004/11/06 Re: Java Researchg License Dalibor Topic
• 2004/11/06 Re: Java Researchg License Matthew Garrett
• 2004/11/06 Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Juhapekka Tolvanen
• 2004/11/06 Re: Open Profanity License Raul Miller
• 2004/11/06 Open Profanity License Juhapekka Tolvanen
• 2004/11/05 Java Researchg License Juhapekka Tolvanen
• 2004/11/05 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/05 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Andrew Suffield
• 2004/11/05 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Andrew Suffield
• 2004/11/05 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Anthony W. Youngman
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Don Armstrong
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/04 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/11/04 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/04 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/04 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/11/04 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Francesco Poli
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Adam McKenna
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Adam McKenna
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/03 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/03 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Frank Küster
• 2004/11/03 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wouter Verhelst
• 2004/11/03 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Jonathan ILIAS
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/11/02 [jcowan@reutershealth.com: Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?] Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Tollef Fog Heen
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
• 2004/11/02 Re: GPL and command-line libraries Josselin Mouette
• 2004/11/02 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/11/02 GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
• 2004/11/01 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/11/01 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/01 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/11/01 Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/11/01 Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Anthony W. Youngman
• 2004/11/01 Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Michael D. Crawford
• 2004/11/01 Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Steve Langasek
• 2004/11/01 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/31 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2004/10/31 Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? John Cowan
• 2004/10/31 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/10/31 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Marco d'Itri
• 2004/10/31 Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Francesco Poli
• 2004/10/30 Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Dan Weber
• 2004/10/30 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Josh Triplett
• 2004/10/30 Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Josh Triplett
• 2004/10/30 Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Dan Weber
• 2004/10/29 Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Shawn Robinson
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*) Benoit PAPILLAULT
• 2004/10/29 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*) Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/29 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Matthew Garrett
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Michael Poole
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*) Michael Poole
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*) Raul Miller
• 2004/10/29 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Michael Poole
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Michael Poole
• 2004/10/29 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Marco d'Itri
• 2004/10/29 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Marco d'Itri
• 2004/10/29 Re: Our Stance on new Sender ID Revision? Andrew Suffield
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies (Was: firmware status for eagle-usb-*) Benoit PAPILLAULT
• 2004/10/28 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Michael Poole
• 2004/10/28 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Michael Poole
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/28 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/28 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Luke Schierer
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Michael Poole
• 2004/10/28 i wish you wehre here Holly Stout
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Raul Miller
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Michael Poole
• 2004/10/28 Re: firmware status for eagle-usb-* Michael Poole
• 2004/10/28 Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib? Glenn Maynard
• 2004/10/28 Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies Francesco Poli

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]