[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:51:56AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> >> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can >> >> pretend it's not there? Which part of the policy or SC justifies this >> >> theory?
>If I ignore something as a part of a system when that thing is outside >that system, there doesn't need to be any pretending. OK, then I have issues with the english language. Let's try again: So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can ignore it's running on your system? Which part of the policy or SC justifies this theory? -- ciao, Marco
