On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > or instead you may notify anyone requesting source that it is > > > freely available from the Elm Development Group. > Doesn't it say that it is sufficient to inform the users that they > can fetch the entire source code of Elm from the Elm Development Group? > Additionally, aren't the users informed about this properly by distributing > this license, e.g. in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright?
What happens if 10 years from now the Elm Development Group no longer exists? This clause can't be enough, since anyone might become unable to satisfy it.
