> >> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:51:56AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >> >> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can > >> >> pretend it's not there? Which part of the policy or SC justifies this > >> >> theory?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >If I ignore something as a part of a system when that thing is outside > >that system, there doesn't need to be any pretending. > OK, then I have issues with the english language. Let's try again: On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:42:00PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can > ignore it's running on your system? Which part of the policy or SC > justifies this theory? No, I've been saying that non-free software can be ignored as long as it's not a part of our system. Section 1 of the social contract provides adequate justification for this theory. -- Raul
