debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Koch
• 2005/01/12 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/12 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Claus Färber
• 2005/01/12 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Claus Färber
• 2005/01/12 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/12 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/12 GPL and CPL/APL are NOT compatible (Was: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe) Mark Wielaard
• 2005/01/12 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/12 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Michael Poole
• 2005/01/12 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches William Ballard
• 2005/01/12 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/12 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Claus Färber
• 2005/01/12 Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Evan Prodromou
• 2005/01/12 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/12 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Daniel Goldsmith
• 2005/01/12 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/11 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Michael Poole
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/11 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/11 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Nick Phillips
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/11 cc me on reply Package The Golden Arches William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Raul Miller
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Michael Poole
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Bernhard R. Link
• 2005/01/11 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Michael Poole
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark David Nusinow
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark David Nusinow
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Michael Poole
• 2005/01/11 Re: I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/11 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/11 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END] Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/11 I'll let the Freemasons know Debian is distributing their trademark William Ballard
• 2005/01/11 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Jacobo Tarrio
• 2005/01/11 Re: Request for IPR review Branden Robinson
• 2005/01/11 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/11 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/11 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? MJ Ray
• 2005/01/11 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? MJ Ray
• 2005/01/11 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Nick Phillips
• 2005/01/11 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? [END] Aurélien Jarno
• 2005/01/11 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Batist Paklons
• 2005/01/11 Re: ReRegarding iraf Jacobo Tarrio
• 2005/01/11 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/10 Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements? Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements? Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements? Raul Miller
• 2005/01/10 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Are drawings of products trademark infringements? William Ballard
• 2005/01/10 Are drawings of products trademark infringements? William Ballard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Helen Faulkner
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Aurelien Jarno
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? William Ballard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Aurelien Jarno
• 2005/01/10 Re: Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Aurelien Jarno
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? William Ballard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Don Armstrong
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Aurelien Jarno
• 2005/01/10 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/10 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems? Aurelien Jarno
• 2005/01/10 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Marco d'Itri
• 2005/01/10 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/10 why is graphviz package non-free? Bjoern
• 2005/01/10 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/10 Your Managers Don't Have Expertise They Have This. Marty Acosta
• 2005/01/10 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/10 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Jacobo Tarrio
• 2005/01/10 Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem Steve McIntyre
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 Re: Dealing with drivers that need firmware on the filesystem Steve McIntyre
• 2005/01/10 ITP: libncar-graphics -- scientific visualization suite from UCAR Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/10 Re: ReRegarding iraf Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/10 ReRegarding iraf Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? MJ Ray
• 2005/01/10 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Alexander Sack
• 2005/01/10 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/09 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Nick Phillips
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Nick Phillips
• 2005/01/09 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? MJ Ray
• 2005/01/09 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL MJ Ray
• 2005/01/09 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Kurt Roeckx
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Joey Hess
• 2005/01/09 Re: More mmcache concerns Elizabeth Fong
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/09 More mmcache concerns Fedor Zuev
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/09 Re: Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Mark Brown
• 2005/01/09 Manpages licensed under GFDL without the license text included Bernhard R. Link
• 2005/01/09 Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs] Don Armstrong
• 2005/01/09 Re: LCC and blobs Marco d'Itri
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/08 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Raul Miller
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/08 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/08 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Raul Miller
• 2005/01/08 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/08 RE:Хотим заказать donna
• 2005/01/08 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/08 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/08 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/08 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/08 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/08 Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers Matthias Klose
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/08 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Simon Josefsson
• 2005/01/08 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Raul Miller
• 2005/01/08 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Don Armstrong
• 2005/01/08 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/08 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/08 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/08 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/08 Re: Question about GFDL Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/08 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/08 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/08 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Batist Paklons
• 2005/01/08 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/07 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/07 Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/07 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/07 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL MJ Ray
• 2005/01/07 Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL Mike Olson
• 2005/01/07 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/07 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Marco d'Itri
• 2005/01/07 Question about GFDL Bernhard R. Link
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Luke Schierer
• 2005/01/07 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/07 Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/07 Re: LCC and blobs Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/07 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/07 Re: phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: AROS License DFSG ok? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/07 Re: Using the Term Debian, DWN 04Jan05 - www.debianshop.com Andreas Brakoulias
• 2005/01/07 Re: Non-free files in source packages? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/07 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/07 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/07 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/06 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/06 Re: Bug#284190: ITP: drdsl -- DSL Assistant for AVM DSL/ISDN-Controllers Matthias Klose
• 2005/01/06 Re: LCC and blobs Ken Arromdee

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]